Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
193,349 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
PreprintPublisher termsEcoEvoRxiv

Why nature cannot be replaced: the limits of substitution in biodiversity conservation

Related

  1. Loss and damage as mental health policy: Valuing what cannot be replaced
    Manasi Kumar
    PLOS ClimatePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClimate sciencePsychiatry & mental healthPLOS
  2. Biodiversity isn't measured in tons: Making sense of nature in the context of sustainable agriculture
    Iqbal Singh Bhalla, Philip A. Loring
    Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of AmericaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  3. Incomplete coverage of the state of nature across biodiversity credit methodologies: an assessment using the State of Nature metrics framework
    Kota Kato
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionEarthArXiv
  4. Combining nature conservation with maritime spatial planning in Northern Europe
    Riku Varjopuro, Annica M Brink, Kemal Pınarbaşı +1
    npj Ocean SustainabilityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Biodiversity conservation policies alter the solution space of climate mitigation scenarios
    Jan Steinhauser, Keywan Riahi, Sreyam Sengupta +9
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textClimate scienceEnvironmental science & pollutionEarthArXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ghijselinck2026nature,
  title = {{Why nature cannot be replaced: the limits of substitution in biodiversity conservation}},
  author = {Dominique Ghijselinck},
  howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.32942/x2869k},
  url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15140/},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Why nature cannot be replaced: the limits of substitution in biodiversity conservation
AU  - Dominique Ghijselinck
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - EcoEvoRxiv
DO  - 10.32942/x2869k
UR  - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15140/
ER  -