Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Quantifying Portfolio Demutualization: A Benchmark-Relative Pooling--Profiling Scale

Abstract

Insurance pricing combines pooling with differentiation: a tariff may leave benchmark differences in expected loss partly mutualized or translate them into policy-level premium differences. We propose a benchmark-relative pooling--profiling scale with two complementary coordinates. The coupled Lp coordinate measures policy-level alignment between an evaluated tariff and a stated benchmark pure premium, whereas the marginal Wasserstein coordinate compares their exposure-weighted premium distributions. The difference between their residual p-costs defines an allocation mismatch. Under portfolio balance, the coupled L1 coordinate has an exact actuarial interpretation: it is the fraction of the transfer volume induced by full pooling that the tariff removes. Synthetic and motor-insurance applications show that broad classes, proxies, shrinkage and tail caps can affect marginal differentiation, policy-level allocation and transfers differently. A barycentric group-parity intervention further shows that conditional premium disparities can fall mainly through reallocation and restored benchmark-relative transfers, with little change in marginal differentiation.

Related

  1. Fast, cheap and sustainable: armament portfolio arbitration under attrition, lead time and political discontinuity
    Caroline Gans Combe
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textOptimisation & controlHAL
  2. Weighted selection from elliptical distributions: a stochastic representation and an application to portfolio separation
    Nils Chr Framstad
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  3. Optimal Transport for Continuous-Time Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection
    Yijie Zeng, Liangquan Zhang, Xun Li
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. A splitting proximal method in portfolio optimization with entropic value-at-risk
    Nail Baloul, Sorin-Mihai Grad, Oleg Wilfer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Cost-Sensitive Online Window Size Selection for Portfolio Management
    Yi-Chen Liu, Chung-Han Hsieh
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{charpentier2026quantifying,
  title = {{Quantifying Portfolio Demutualization: A Benchmark-Relative Pooling--Profiling Scale}},
  author = {Arthur Charpentier and Laurence Barry},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.23294},
  eprint = {2609.23294},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23294},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantifying Portfolio Demutualization: A Benchmark-Relative Pooling--Profiling Scale
AU  - Arthur Charpentier
AU  - Laurence Barry
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.23294
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23294
AB  - Insurance pricing combines pooling with differentiation: a tariff may leave benchmark differences in expected loss partly mutualized or translate them into policy-level premium differences. We propose a benchmark-relative pooling--profiling scale with two complementary coordinates. The coupled L^p coordinate measures policy-level alignment between an evaluated tariff and a stated benchmark pure premium, whereas the marginal Wasserstein coordinate compares their exposure-weighted premium distributions. The difference between their residual p-costs defines an allocation mismatch. Under portfolio balance, the coupled L^1 coordinate has an exact actuarial interpretation: it is the fraction of the transfer volume induced by full pooling that the tariff removes. Synthetic and motor-insurance applications show that broad classes, proxies, shrinkage and tail caps can affect marginal differentiation, policy-level allocation and transfers differently. A barycentric group-parity intervention further shows that conditional premium disparities can fall mainly through reallocation and restored benchmark-relative transfers, with little change in marginal differentiation.
ER  -