airQ intubating laryngeal airway: An alternative to intubating laryngeal mask airway for fiberoptic guided intubation in neutral head position
Abstract
Background: Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) is a time-tested device useful in situations demanding a neutral head position (difficult airway), whereas airQ intubating laryngeal airway (airQ ILA) is a newer device. A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the efficacy of airQ ILA with ILMA, as a ventilating device and as a conduit for fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided intubation, in a neutral head position. Methodology: airQ ILA and ILMA were inserted in the respective groups of 40 patients each. After confirmation of adequate ventilation, fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation was performed via the respective supraglottic airway (SGA) device. The number of attempts and time taken for SGA device placement, glottic view, number of attempts, and time taken for tracheal intubation were recorded. Incidence of postoperative complications was also noted. Results: Seventy percent of patients in the airQ ILA group and 62.5% of patients in the ILMA group had Brimacombe grade 4 glottic view through an SGA device. Ninety percent of patients were intubated using airQ ILA in the first attempt compared to 87.5% of patients in the ILMA group. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: airQ ILA is as simple, safe, and efficacious as time-tested ILMA. It can be used as an alternative to ILMA for ventilation and as a conduit for fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided intubation in a neutral head position.
Related
- Comparison of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Intubation for Airway Management During Short Urologic Procedures in the Prone Position: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- One-lung Ventilation for Neonatal Pneumonectomy in a Hydropic Premature Infant: Fiberoptic-guided Left Mainstem Intubation
- Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided bronchial biopsies for suspected lung cancer in intensive care unit: A 10-year retrospective study
- A sequential dose-finding study of fentanyl during remimazolam induction for tracheal intubation in adults
- Airway ultrasound versus capnography to confirm endotracheal intubation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{gupta2026airq,
title = {{airQ intubating laryngeal airway: An alternative to intubating laryngeal mask airway for fiberoptic guided intubation in neutral head position}},
author = {Aastha Gupta and Neerja Banerjee and Archana Khokar and Nidhi Pathak and Namita Saraswat and Rutajeet Chatterjee},
journal = {Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_75_24},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_75_24},
note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - airQ intubating laryngeal airway: An alternative to intubating laryngeal mask airway for fiberoptic guided intubation in neutral head position
AU - Aastha Gupta
AU - Neerja Banerjee
AU - Archana Khokar
AU - Nidhi Pathak
AU - Namita Saraswat
AU - Rutajeet Chatterjee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences
DO - 10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_75_24
UR - https://doi.org/10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_75_24
AB - Background: Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) is a time-tested device useful in situations demanding a neutral head position (difficult airway), whereas airQ intubating laryngeal airway (airQ ILA) is a newer device. A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the efficacy of airQ ILA with ILMA, as a ventilating device and as a conduit for fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided intubation, in a neutral head position. Methodology: airQ ILA and ILMA were inserted in the respective groups of 40 patients each. After confirmation of adequate ventilation, fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation was performed via the respective supraglottic airway (SGA) device. The number of attempts and time taken for SGA device placement, glottic view, number of attempts, and time taken for tracheal intubation were recorded. Incidence of postoperative complications was also noted. Results: Seventy percent of patients in the airQ ILA group and 62.5% of patients in the ILMA group had Brimacombe grade 4 glottic view through an SGA device. Ninety percent of patients were intubated using airQ ILA in the first attempt compared to 87.5% of patients in the ILMA group. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: airQ ILA is as simple, safe, and efficacious as time-tested ILMA. It can be used as an alternative to ILMA for ventilation and as a conduit for fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided intubation in a neutral head position.
SN - 2278-1889
SN - 2277-8632
ER -