PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv
Proof Perplexity: A Probabilistic Approach to Measuring non-triviality in Machine Generated Proofs
Abstract
In this article, we propose a benchmark to quantify the non-triviality and novelty of machine-generated mathematical proofs compared to existing literature. Our core methodology uses a probabilistic measure to evaluate the non-triviality of the underlying mathematical arguments in comparison to the current \texttt{MATHLIB} library. Finally, we apply this benchmark to the recent proof generated by Claude on the complex zeros of the Riemann zeta function to test for non-trivial steps.
Related
- Application of spectroscopic and multispectral imaging technologies on the assessment of ready-to-eat pineapple quality: A performance evaluation study of machine learning models generated from two commercial data analytics tools
- Probabilistic storyline attribution using machine learning
- Axiomatic Learning and Probabilistic Structures with first applications to variants of Arithmetic Machine Learning and beyond
- What the Machine Invented: Mining New Mathematical Instruments from OpenAI's October 2026 Release of AI-Generated Mathematics
- Global and local triviality for extensions of ample groupoids: an algebraic approach
BibTeX
@misc{das2026proof,
title = {{Proof Perplexity: A Probabilistic Approach to Measuring non-triviality in Machine Generated Proofs}},
author = {Madhuparna Das and Soumya Banerjee},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.22612},
eprint = {2610.22612},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22612},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Proof Perplexity: A Probabilistic Approach to Measuring non-triviality in Machine Generated Proofs
AU - Madhuparna Das
AU - Soumya Banerjee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/15
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.22612
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22612
AB - In this article, we propose a benchmark to quantify the non-triviality and novelty of machine-generated mathematical proofs compared to existing literature. Our core methodology uses a probabilistic measure to evaluate the non-triviality of the underlying mathematical arguments in comparison to the current \texttt{MATHLIB} library. Finally, we apply this benchmark to the recent proof generated by Claude on the complex zeros of the Riemann zeta function to test for non-trivial steps.
ER -