Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Helicobacter pylori and colorectal neoplasia with emphasis on microbial mechanisms and causal evidence

  1. 1epartment of Gastroenterology, The People’s Hospital of Danyang, Affiliated Danyang Hospital of Nantong University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated with colorectal neoplasia in many observational studies, but a causal relationship and a preventive effect of eradication remain unestablished. This narrative review integrates clinical, microbial, experimental, and treatment evidence using four questions: which infection phenotype was measured, whether exposure preceded the colorectal outcome, whether a proposed intermediate was experimentally perturbed, and whether a defined intervention changed that outcome. Positive observational syntheses contrast with weaker or inconsistent prospective serological and genetic findings. Residual confounding, including socioeconomic and lifestyle differences, and non-equivalent exposure measurements limit causal interpretation. Gastric atrophy, endocrine changes, microbial remodeling, metabolites, and immune responses provide candidate links, but no complete infection-to-neoplasia sequence has been demonstrated in humans. Microbiota-dependent tumor promotion in genetically susceptible mice provides experimental support within that setting, whereas reduced tumor formation in an inflammation-driven model limits generalization. Neither model reproduces the duration and heterogeneity of human infection. Eradication findings depend on comparator selection, sufficient latency, and separation of randomized treatment assignment from successful clearance. A comparative appraisal links each proposed mechanism to its strongest available evidence, unresolved human causal link, and required validation. Infection status alone is not established as a basis for changing colorectal screening or claiming colorectal cancer prevention through eradication. Longitudinal human sampling, targeted tests of candidate intermediates, and long-term intervention analyses with explicit treatment comparisons are needed to establish clinical relevance.

Related

  1. Helicobacter pylori infection, histological gradient, and lesion phenotype specificity in colorectal neoplasia: a three-group analysis of 1556 adults undergoing colonoscopy in China
    Preventive medicine reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Age-stratified gradients of colorectal neoplasia and an exploratory endoscopic red-flag composite in a lesion-confirmed screening colonoscopy cohort
    Lina Du, Jingzhi Su, Jihua Dai +9
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia among Patients Undergoing Repeated Colonoscopy Surveillance: A Two-Center Study.
    Takuji Kawamura, Yasushi Oda, Go Horiguchi +2
    Journal of the anus, rectum and colonPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
  4. Beyond White-Light Colonoscopy: Water Exchange, Image-Enhanced Endoscopy, and Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection—From Single Tools to Combined Strategies: A Scoping Review
    Teodora Spataru, Remus Popescu, Alina Pistritu +2
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
  5. Case Report: A germline SDHB c.268C>T (p.Arg90Ter) variant in a family with very-early-onset colorectal neoplasia
    Chang Liu, Dayang Zhou, Wenjing Xu +4
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{xu2026helicobacter,
  title = {{Helicobacter pylori and colorectal neoplasia with emphasis on microbial mechanisms and causal evidence}},
  author = {Jian Xu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fcimb.2026.1996461},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1996461},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Helicobacter pylori and colorectal neoplasia with emphasis on microbial mechanisms and causal evidence
AU  - Jian Xu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
DO  - 10.3389/fcimb.2026.1996461
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1996461
AB  - Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated with colorectal neoplasia in many observational studies, but a causal relationship and a preventive effect of eradication remain unestablished. This narrative review integrates clinical, microbial, experimental, and treatment evidence using four questions: which infection phenotype was measured, whether exposure preceded the colorectal outcome, whether a proposed intermediate was experimentally perturbed, and whether a defined intervention changed that outcome. Positive observational syntheses contrast with weaker or inconsistent prospective serological and genetic findings. Residual confounding, including socioeconomic and lifestyle differences, and non-equivalent exposure measurements limit causal interpretation. Gastric atrophy, endocrine changes, microbial remodeling, metabolites, and immune responses provide candidate links, but no complete infection-to-neoplasia sequence has been demonstrated in humans. Microbiota-dependent tumor promotion in genetically susceptible mice provides experimental support within that setting, whereas reduced tumor formation in an inflammation-driven model limits generalization. Neither model reproduces the duration and heterogeneity of human infection. Eradication findings depend on comparator selection, sufficient latency, and separation of randomized treatment assignment from successful clearance. A comparative appraisal links each proposed mechanism to its strongest available evidence, unresolved human causal link, and required validation. Infection status alone is not established as a basis for changing colorectal screening or claiming colorectal cancer prevention through eradication. Longitudinal human sampling, targeted tests of candidate intermediates, and long-term intervention analyses with explicit treatment comparisons are needed to establish clinical relevance.
SN  - 2235-2988
ER  -