Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Tsallis Holographic Dark Energy with varying Gravitational Constant vs ΛCDM : A Comparative Outlook

Abstract

We investigate the cosmological evolution of a flat Friedmann--Robertson--Walker Universe filled with Tsallis holographic dark energy (THDE) under the assumption that the gravitational constant G varies with time according to the power-law parametrisation dln G / dln a = αG = const. In this framework, the holographic dark energy density is given by ρDE ∝ L2γ− 4, where L is the future event horizon and γ is the Tsallis non-additivity parameter. We study both the past and future evolution of the Universe for various values of the model parameters C, γ, and αG. The viability of the model is tested against a combination of observational data, including the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova sample, direct Hubble parameter measurements H(z), and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data. Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods and Bayesian analysis tools such as the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC), the Bayes factor, and the suspiciousness metric, we perform a rigorous statistical comparison with the standard ΛCDM model. Our results show that models with a varying gravitational constant are preferred over ΛCDM. The best fit to the combined data is obtained for the THDE model with C < 1. Furthermore, we analyse the internal consistency of the data sets using the Index of Inconsistency, the QDMAP statistic, and Bayesian suspiciousness. We find that the THDE model with varying G and C < 1 partially alleviates the tensions between different probes, reducing the significance from ∼ 7.4σ to ∼ 5.3σ.

Versions

Related

  1. Phantom-Divide Crossing in Barrow-Tsallis Holographic Dark Energy with a Scale-Dependent Barrow Exponent
    D. A. Yerokhin
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  2. Dielectric constant of holographic insulator from quantum geometry
    Debabrata Ghorai, Taewon Yuk, Sang-Jin Sin
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Gravitational form factors of the proton in the improved holographic QCD model
    Antti Hippeläinen, Niko Jokela, Matti Järvinen
    Journal of High Energy PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsSpringerCrossref
  4. Gravitational form factors of the pion in light-front holographic QCD
    Jiali Deng, Xiaolong Wang, Yang Zhou +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. Design and Monte Carlo simulation of a phase grating moiré neutron interferometer to measure the gravitational constant
    C. Kapahi, D. Sarenac, B. Heacock +5
    Communications PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Atomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{astashenok2026tsallis,
  title = {{Tsallis Holographic Dark Energy with varying Gravitational Constant vs $Λ$CDM : A Comparative Outlook}},
  author = {Artyom V. Astashenok and Alexander S. Tepliakov},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.23592},
  eprint = {2608.23592},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23592},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Tsallis Holographic Dark Energy with varying Gravitational Constant vs ΛCDM : A Comparative Outlook
AU  - Artyom V. Astashenok
AU  - Alexander S. Tepliakov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.23592
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23592
AB  - We investigate the cosmological evolution of a flat Friedmann--Robertson--Walker Universe filled with Tsallis holographic dark energy (THDE) under the assumption that the gravitational constant G varies with time according to the power-law parametrisation dln G / dln a = α_G = const. In this framework, the holographic dark energy density is given by ρ_DE ∝ L^2γ− 4, where L is the future event horizon and γ is the Tsallis non-additivity parameter. We study both the past and future evolution of the Universe for various values of the model parameters C, γ, and α_G. The viability of the model is tested against a combination of observational data, including the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova sample, direct Hubble parameter measurements H(z), and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data. Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods and Bayesian analysis tools such as the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC), the Bayes factor, and the suspiciousness metric, we perform a rigorous statistical comparison with the standard ΛCDM model. Our results show that models with a varying gravitational constant are preferred over ΛCDM. The best fit to the combined data is obtained for the THDE model with C < 1. Furthermore, we analyse the internal consistency of the data sets using the Index of Inconsistency, the Q_DMAP statistic, and Bayesian suspiciousness. We find that the THDE model with varying G and C < 1 partially alleviates the tensions between different probes, reducing the significance from ∼ 7.4σ to ∼ 5.3σ.
ER  -