Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

DM-RSA-OAEP: Formal Treatment of a Dual-Modulus Fault-Detection Countermeasure Based on Physical Diversity

Abstract

We revisit DM-RSA, an RSA variant that uses two independent moduli, whose original version was broken by Håstad's attack and contained an incorrect compromise-tolerance claim. We give a formal treatment of its repaired variant, DM-RSA-OAEP: (i) a complete IND-CCA2 security proof in the random-oracle model via a two-step hybrid argument, upper-bounding the security of the scheme by that of the weaker underlying RSA-OAEP instance, with an explicit simulation loss; (ii) a fault-detection theorem in an explicit adversary model that covers computation, key, and verification faults, including safe-error attacks, under a clearly stated physical-diversity assumption; (iii) an explicit analysis of why the countermeasure degrades to uselessness when the diversity assumption is violated (common-mode faults on a single chip). We position the scheme against the countermeasure landscape and against the broken dual-modulus literature. The contribution is deliberately framed as a fault countermeasure with a provable detection guarantee, not as a computationally stronger RSA. We conclude with a concrete instantiation and a detailed measurement protocol.

Related

  1. Distributed Algorithms for Filtering, Estimation, and Fault Detection over Cyber-Physical-Systems: A Tutorial and Survey
    Mohammadreza Doostmohammadian, Mahdi Shamsi, Hadi Zayyani +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. A Cyber Physical Framework for Intelligent Fault Detection and Predictive Maintenance in Digital Power Grids
    Zhuangwei Chen, Beilei Zhang, Qing Jiang +2
    EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy WebPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  3. Voevodsky motives and motives with modulus with finite coefficients in characteristic zero
    Keiho Matsumoto
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Modulus of Continuity for Finite Energy Homeomorphisms of the Circle
    Mihai Florincescu, Gaven Martin, Cong Yao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. A Bounded Closed Convex Set in c0(ℂ) without Modulus Support Functionals
    Xin Luo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{andriamifidisoa2026dmrsaoaep,
  title = {{DM-RSA-OAEP: Formal Treatment of a Dual-Modulus Fault-Detection Countermeasure Based on Physical Diversity}},
  author = {Ramamonjy Andriamifidisoa and Rufine Marius Lalasoa},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.26642},
  eprint = {2610.26642},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26642},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - DM-RSA-OAEP: Formal Treatment of a Dual-Modulus Fault-Detection Countermeasure Based on Physical Diversity
AU  - Ramamonjy Andriamifidisoa
AU  - Rufine Marius Lalasoa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.26642
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26642
AB  - We revisit DM-RSA, an RSA variant that uses two independent moduli, whose original version was broken by Håstad's attack and contained an incorrect compromise-tolerance claim. We give a formal treatment of its repaired variant, DM-RSA-OAEP: (i) a complete IND-CCA2 security proof in the random-oracle model via a two-step hybrid argument, upper-bounding the security of the scheme by that of the weaker underlying RSA-OAEP instance, with an explicit simulation loss; (ii) a fault-detection theorem in an explicit adversary model that covers computation, key, and verification faults, including safe-error attacks, under a clearly stated physical-diversity assumption; (iii) an explicit analysis of why the countermeasure degrades to uselessness when the diversity assumption is violated (common-mode faults on a single chip). We position the scheme against the countermeasure landscape and against the broken dual-modulus literature. The contribution is deliberately framed as a fault countermeasure with a provable detection guarantee, not as a computationally stronger RSA. We conclude with a concrete instantiation and a detailed measurement protocol.
ER  -