Irish Healthcare Staff Perspectives on the Implementation of the Age‐Friendly Health Systems 4Ms Framework. A Qualitative Analysis
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Public Health Health Service Executive (HSE) South West Cork Ireland
- 2Department of Geriatrics Cork University Hospital Cork Ireland
- 3Department of Palliative Medicine Marymount University Hospital and Hospice Cork Ireland
- 4Integrated Care Programme for Older People (ICPOP) South Cork Ireland
- 5School of Public Health University College Cork Cork Ireland
Abstract
Background: The Age‐Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) 4Ms Framework (what Matters most, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) is an internationally recognized, evidence‐based approach to deliver consistent, person‐centered care to older adults in all healthcare settings. This qualitative study evaluated the implementation of the 4Ms Framework, from the perspective of multidisciplinary team members, at three early‐adopter healthcare services in Ireland.
Participants and Setting: Ten one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with doctors, nurses, and health and social care professionals working in three distinct healthcare settings in Ireland.
Methods: A qualitative interpretive phenomenological design was adopted, following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Participants were purposively sampled to capture diverse perspectives across services, disciplines, and roles. The topic guide was informed by the Normalization Process Theory. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed manually using iterative thematic content analysis.
Results: The overarching theme identified, a supporting and enabling structure, was supported by three major themes: (1) Ability of the 4Ms Framework to facilitate an AFHS approach, (2) Securing sustainability of an AFHS, and (3) Impact of the 4Ms Framework as a driver of the implementation process. Based on these findings facilitators to implementation included early stakeholder engagement, strong leadership, and a scalable approach that fostered multidisciplinary collaboration and person‐centered care with minimal extra resources. Barriers to implementation included reliance on Americanized materials, risks of tokenistic adoption, variable integration across settings, and limited outcome evaluation.
Conclusion: The AFHS 4Ms Framework supports transformative, person‐centered care across diverse settings. This first Irish AFHS evaluation provides recommendations for wider implementation of the 4Ms Framework while contributing novel insights to the international implementation evidence base. This study emphasizes the need to adapt the 4Ms Framework to local systems, integrate robust evaluation, and build on the identified facilitators while addressing barriers to achieve sustainable, scalable adoption within healthcare settings.
Related
- Stakeholder perspectives on sustainable antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APOCUS) implementation in rural Australia: a qualitative study of professional body submissions and clinician focus groups.
- Accessibility of essential medicines and vaccines among fisherfolk, artisanal miners and pastoralists in Mainland Tanzania: a qualitative study of barriers and strategies from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and community leaders.
- A longitudinal qualitative evaluation of the rollout of a complex digital intervention across healthcare organisations and the significance of implementation pace
- A preliminary qualitative exploration of perceived barriers and facilitators prior to implementation of a pressure injury prevention program in home care: perspectives of care managers in Japan.
- What is an ideal mHealth for post-discharge home care of CHD: perspectives from primary caregivers, healthcare professionals, and project technical consultants: a qualitative research study
BibTeX
@article{ogorman2026irish,
title = {{Irish Healthcare Staff Perspectives on the Implementation of the Age‐Friendly Health Systems 4Ms Framework. A Qualitative Analysis}},
author = {Tessa O'Gorman and Heather Hegarty and Rebecca Marshall and Hannah O'Brien and Niamh Bambury},
journal = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1111/jgs.70598},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70598},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Irish Healthcare Staff Perspectives on the Implementation of the Age‐Friendly Health Systems 4Ms Framework. A Qualitative Analysis
AU - Tessa O'Gorman
AU - Heather Hegarty
AU - Rebecca Marshall
AU - Hannah O'Brien
AU - Niamh Bambury
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
DO - 10.1111/jgs.70598
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70598
AB - Background: The Age‐Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) 4Ms Framework (what Matters most, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) is an internationally recognized, evidence‐based approach to deliver consistent, person‐centered care to older adults in all healthcare settings. This qualitative study evaluated the implementation of the 4Ms Framework, from the perspective of multidisciplinary team members, at three early‐adopter healthcare services in Ireland. Participants and Setting: Ten one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with doctors, nurses, and health and social care professionals working in three distinct healthcare settings in Ireland. Methods: A qualitative interpretive phenomenological design was adopted, following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Participants were purposively sampled to capture diverse perspectives across services, disciplines, and roles. The topic guide was informed by the Normalization Process Theory. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed manually using iterative thematic content analysis. Results: The overarching theme identified, a supporting and enabling structure, was supported by three major themes: (1) Ability of the 4Ms Framework to facilitate an AFHS approach, (2) Securing sustainability of an AFHS, and (3) Impact of the 4Ms Framework as a driver of the implementation process. Based on these findings facilitators to implementation included early stakeholder engagement, strong leadership, and a scalable approach that fostered multidisciplinary collaboration and person‐centered care with minimal extra resources. Barriers to implementation included reliance on Americanized materials, risks of tokenistic adoption, variable integration across settings, and limited outcome evaluation. Conclusion: The AFHS 4Ms Framework supports transformative, person‐centered care across diverse settings. This first Irish AFHS evaluation provides recommendations for wider implementation of the 4Ms Framework while contributing novel insights to the international implementation evidence base. This study emphasizes the need to adapt the 4Ms Framework to local systems, integrate robust evaluation, and build on the identified facilitators while addressing barriers to achieve sustainable, scalable adoption within healthcare settings.
SN - 0002-8614
SN - 1532-5415
ER -