Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Regret Equals Covariance: A Closed-Form Characterization for Stochastic Optimization

Abstract

Quantifying regret typically involves repeatedly re-solving a stochastic optimization problem across simulated scenarios. Such an approach is costly: the cost scales with the number of scenarios and the cost of each solve. We propose that regret can instead be measured using the joint moments of the cost vector c and the optimal decision π*(c). Working with the optimal concave and Lipschitz under only a feasible region value function v(c) = minz∈ Z c⊤ z, we show that regret always decomposes as Regret = −Cov(c,π*(c)) − R(c) for a residual R(c). We further show that R(c)=0 when π* is affine in c, which holds for unconstrained and equality-constrained (e.g., budget-constrained Markowitz) quadratic programs and many, but not all, linear programs. For all cases, we give a distribution-free bound Regret ≤ D√(tr(Σc)) that depends only on the radius of the feasible region and the cost covariance. We also derive concentration and asymptotic-normality results for the empirical regret, the latter under an explicit and checkable non-degeneracy condition.

Related

  1. Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Monotone Stochastic Optimization under Semi-Bandit Feedback
    Tao Hu, Rohan Ghuge
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Sharp Regret Bounds and a Task-Covariance Correction for Spectral Representation Learning
    Dier Tang, Jing Yee Tan, Guangyue Han
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Regret-Based Scenario-Tree Construction for Multistage Stochastic Programs with Deterministic Constraints
    Robin Bruneel, Mathijs Schuurmans, Panagiotis Patrinos
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Improved Regret Analysis for Parallel Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization
    Shion Takeno, Shogo Iwazaki
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Dec-BFTRL: Squre-Root Regret for Decentralized Online Upper-Linearizable Optimization under Separation Access with Application to Continuous Submodular Maximization
    Yiyang Lu, Mohammad Pedramfar, Vaneet Aggarwal
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{aldridge2026regret,
  title = {{Regret Equals Covariance: A Closed-Form Characterization for Stochastic Optimization}},
  author = {Irene Aldridge},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.14019},
  eprint = {2605.14019},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14019},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Regret Equals Covariance: A Closed-Form Characterization for Stochastic Optimization
AU  - Irene Aldridge
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.14019
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14019
AB  - Quantifying regret typically involves repeatedly re-solving a stochastic optimization problem across simulated scenarios. Such an approach is costly: the cost scales with the number of scenarios and the cost of each solve. We propose that regret can instead be measured using the joint moments of the cost vector c and the optimal decision π^*(c). Working with the optimal concave and Lipschitz under only a feasible region value function v(c) = min_z∈ Z c^⊤ z, we show that regret always decomposes as Regret = −Cov(c,π^*(c)) − R(c) for a residual R(c). We further show that R(c)=0 when π^* is affine in c, which holds for unconstrained and equality-constrained (e.g., budget-constrained Markowitz) quadratic programs and many, but not all, linear programs. For all cases, we give a distribution-free bound Regret ≤ D√(tr(Σ_c)) that depends only on the radius of the feasible region and the cost covariance. We also derive concentration and asymptotic-normality results for the empirical regret, the latter under an explicit and checkable non-degeneracy condition.
ER  -