Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in neurology

Remote ischemic conditioning plus stenting for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (RICSICAS): rationale and design

  1. 1Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command , ,

Abstract

Background: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has emerged as a promising non-invasive strategy to protect the brain, with evidence suggesting its benefit in patients with carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, the long-term benefit and safety of chronic RIC in this population remain unknown.

Objective: To evaluate whether chronic RIC reduces the incidence of major vascular events in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis who received CAS.

Methods: RICSICAS is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE), single-center trial. We plan to enroll 450 high-risk patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (Essen score ≥ 3) scheduled for CAS. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either standard medical therapy plus RIC or standard medical therapy alone. The RIC protocol involves bilateral upper-arm cuff inflation to 200 mmHg (5-min inflation/5-min deflation, 5 cycles) performed 1–2 times daily, starting 3 days before CAS and continuing for 12 months post-procedure, thus constituting a combined peri-procedural and chronic RIC strategy. The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, TIA, and vascular death within 12 months. Safety endpoints include any RIC-related adverse event (e.g., limb pain, petechiae, peripheral nerve injury), and any serious adverse event.

Sample Size: Assuming a 12-month event rate of 20% in the control group and a 40% relative risk reduction with RIC, with 80% power and a two-sided α of 0.05, 355 patients are required. Accounting for a 20% dropout rate/loss-to-follow-up, as well as the consumption of the interim analysis, the total sample size is set as 450.

Discussion: This trial will provide high-level evidence on the role of long-term RIC as an adjunctive therapy for high-risk patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergoing CAS.

Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT07412249.

Related

  1. Recurrent Ischemic Stroke after Carotid Artery Stenting for Thyroid Cartilage Induced CCA Stenosis: Was Stenting an Appropriate Treatment?
    Yuya Kobayashi, Ryotaro Yui, Chinami Yuzawa +2
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineJ-STAGE
  2. Commentary to: Carotid Stenting for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Call for Judicious Approach
    Seon-Kyu Lee, Evan Lipsitz, Daniel Labovitz
    NeurointerventionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  3. Innovative application of pressure gradient measurement in internal carotid stenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (NOTICE-CAS): study protocol for a randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial
    Krzysztof Ściborski, Artur Telichowski, Natalia Świątoniowska-Lonc +19
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  4. The clinical application of a low-profile stent for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery: a retrospective study of the Atlas stent
    Wenyan Xu, Xu Guan, Fangfang Guo +13
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  5. Management of Symptomatic Genu Recurvatum: Biomechanical Rationale, Etiology-Based Treatment Algorithm, and a Surgical Technical Blueprint
    Vladan Stevanovic, Filip Cucakovic
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{qiu2026remote,
  title = {{Remote ischemic conditioning plus stenting for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (RICSICAS): rationale and design}},
  author = {Jing Qiu and Wei Li and Yong-Gang Zhao and Jia-Qi Wang and Lu Wang and Hui-Sheng Chen},
  journal = {Frontiers in neurology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1915534},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661333},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Remote ischemic conditioning plus stenting for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (RICSICAS): rationale and design
AU  - Jing Qiu
AU  - Wei Li
AU  - Yong-Gang Zhao
AU  - Jia-Qi Wang
AU  - Lu Wang
AU  - Hui-Sheng Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Frontiers in neurology
DO  - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1915534
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661333
AB  - Background: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has emerged as a promising non-invasive strategy to protect the brain, with evidence suggesting its benefit in patients with carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, the long-term benefit and safety of chronic RIC in this population remain unknown.  Objective: To evaluate whether chronic RIC reduces the incidence of major vascular events in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis who received CAS.  Methods: RICSICAS is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE), single-center trial. We plan to enroll 450 high-risk patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (Essen score ≥ 3) scheduled for CAS. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either standard medical therapy plus RIC or standard medical therapy alone. The RIC protocol involves bilateral upper-arm cuff inflation to 200 mmHg (5-min inflation/5-min deflation, 5 cycles) performed 1–2 times daily, starting 3 days before CAS and continuing for 12 months post-procedure, thus constituting a combined peri-procedural and chronic RIC strategy. The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, TIA, and vascular death within 12 months. Safety endpoints include any RIC-related adverse event (e.g., limb pain, petechiae, peripheral nerve injury), and any serious adverse event.  Sample Size: Assuming a 12-month event rate of 20% in the control group and a 40% relative risk reduction with RIC, with 80% power and a two-sided α of 0.05, 355 patients are required. Accounting for a 20% dropout rate/loss-to-follow-up, as well as the consumption of the interim analysis, the total sample size is set as 450.  Discussion: This trial will provide high-level evidence on the role of long-term RIC as an adjunctive therapy for high-risk patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergoing CAS.  Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT07412249.
SN  - 1664-2295
ER  -