Barriers and facilitators of conservative kidney management in older adults with chronic kidney failure: a qualitative study with nephrologists in Germany
4 affiliations
- 1Institute of Public Health, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- 2Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562 Rüdersdorf, Germany
- 3Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Rüdersdorf, Germany
- 4Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Abstract
Background: Conservative kidney management (CKM) offers a treatment option for older adults with chronic kidney failure (CKF) and limited life expectancy. International evidence suggests that nephrologists face challenges in providing CKM. However, in Germany, in-depth research on this topic remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to explore barriers and facilitators experienced by nephrologists in CKM delivery to derive measures for improving its implementation.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nephrologists working in inpatient or outpatient settings in Berlin and the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany in 2024. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) guided data collection. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Results: Eleven interviews were conducted. Nephrologists reported barriers and facilitators across ten TDF domains, overall. Barriers in delivering CKM were identified across nine TDF domains, such as knowledge (lack of CKM education), skills (insufficient shared-decision-making, SDM), social/professional role and identity (lack of clarification of nephrologists’ role in palliative care, divergence from professional role perception), beliefs about consequences (caregiver burden), reinforcement (unattractive reimbursement), environmental context and resources (insufficient intersectoral and interdisciplinary collaboration), and social influences (relatives, societal expectations). Facilitators were also reported in nine TDF domains, for example knowledge (CKM training), reinforcement (adequate reimbursement), intentions (adjustment of treatment goals for older patients), environmental context and resources (improved interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaboration, patient decision aids), and social influences (treatment discussions with and without relatives).
Conclusions: CKM delivery is challenging at multiple levels. Our findings align with international barriers and complement previous national evidence by providing deeper insight into nephrologists’ attitudes, barriers within SDM, and the role of relatives. Improving CKM implementation requires multifaceted strategies, particularly system-level measures such as adequate reimbursement and CKM-related training to strengthen awareness and acceptance. In addition, structured SDM approaches and guidance on involving and considering relatives may be crucial to support CKM as a valid treatment option.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-05470-3.
Related
- From Awareness to Practice: Barriers and Facilitators to Saudi Men’s Engagement with Pelvic Floor Muscle Training as Conservative Rehabilitation—A Qualitative Study
- Barriers and facilitators to self-management among patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A qualitative study informed by the integrated theory of health behavior change
- Facilitators and barriers to nurses’ adherence to traumatic brain injury management guidelines at the accident and emergency unit in a national referral hospital in Uganda: a qualitative study
- Barriers and facilitators to telerehabilitation adherence in young and middle-aged stroke survivors: a qualitative COM-B analysis
- Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Physiotherapists’ Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines and Return to Sport Criteria after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Qualitative Study in Austria.
BibTeX
@article{kaiser2026barriers,
title = {{Barriers and facilitators of conservative kidney management in older adults with chronic kidney failure: a qualitative study with nephrologists in Germany}},
author = {Janine Kaiser and Charlotte M. Kugler and Muhammad Helmi Barghouth and Natalie Ebert and Nina Mielke and Maja Krajewska and Elke Schaeffner},
journal = {BMC Nephrology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s12882-026-05470-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-05470-3},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Barriers and facilitators of conservative kidney management in older adults with chronic kidney failure: a qualitative study with nephrologists in Germany
AU - Janine Kaiser
AU - Charlotte M. Kugler
AU - Muhammad Helmi Barghouth
AU - Natalie Ebert
AU - Nina Mielke
AU - Maja Krajewska
AU - Elke Schaeffner
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/31
JO - BMC Nephrology
DO - 10.1186/s12882-026-05470-3
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-05470-3
AB - Background: Conservative kidney management (CKM) offers a treatment option for older adults with chronic kidney failure (CKF) and limited life expectancy. International evidence suggests that nephrologists face challenges in providing CKM. However, in Germany, in-depth research on this topic remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to explore barriers and facilitators experienced by nephrologists in CKM delivery to derive measures for improving its implementation. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nephrologists working in inpatient or outpatient settings in Berlin and the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany in 2024. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) guided data collection. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Eleven interviews were conducted. Nephrologists reported barriers and facilitators across ten TDF domains, overall. Barriers in delivering CKM were identified across nine TDF domains, such as knowledge (lack of CKM education), skills (insufficient shared-decision-making, SDM), social/professional role and identity (lack of clarification of nephrologists’ role in palliative care, divergence from professional role perception), beliefs about consequences (caregiver burden), reinforcement (unattractive reimbursement), environmental context and resources (insufficient intersectoral and interdisciplinary collaboration), and social influences (relatives, societal expectations). Facilitators were also reported in nine TDF domains, for example knowledge (CKM training), reinforcement (adequate reimbursement), intentions (adjustment of treatment goals for older patients), environmental context and resources (improved interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaboration, patient decision aids), and social influences (treatment discussions with and without relatives). Conclusions: CKM delivery is challenging at multiple levels. Our findings align with international barriers and complement previous national evidence by providing deeper insight into nephrologists’ attitudes, barriers within SDM, and the role of relatives. Improving CKM implementation requires multifaceted strategies, particularly system-level measures such as adequate reimbursement and CKM-related training to strengthen awareness and acceptance. In addition, structured SDM approaches and guidance on involving and considering relatives may be crucial to support CKM as a valid treatment option. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-05470-3.
SN - 1471-2369
ER -