Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The domain question for the Nielsen-Soelberg group rings: the commutative case, with certified ball checks

Abstract

Nielsen and Soelberg exhibited three torsion-free groups G_1, G_2, G_3 carrying 8-element sets without unique products, and asked whether any of the group rings R[G_i], R a domain, is a domain. We record that for every commutative domain R the answer is affirmative for all three groups: each G_i is virtually nilpotent, so the theorem of Kropholler, Linnell and Moody applies over every field, in every characteristic, and commutative coefficients reduce to the fraction field. Every ingredient is in the literature except the nilpotent structure of the relevant finite-index subgroup of G_2, which is supplied by the certified computational model of our companion paper (arXiv:2607.19687). The question therefore remains open exactly for noncommutative coefficient domains, where the unique-product mechanism -- the only known ring-independent one -- is precisely what these groups are constructed to lack. As a complement we report machine-checkable, DRAT-certified verifications that F_2[G_i] has no zero divisors with both supports in explicit balls of the defining generating sets, obtained by propositional reasoning alone, independent of the K-theoretic machinery; we state precisely what these certificates do and do not add.

Related

  1. The quantitative non-unique-product landscape at the global minimum: the Nielsen-Soelberg groups
    Moe Tabei
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. Every commutative perfect ring is a quotient of an almost perfect domain
    Xiaolei Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. On the Nielsen realisation problem for cyclic groups of prime order
    Christian Kremer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Nielsen coincidence theory for (n,m)-valued pairs
    Karel Dekimpe, Lore De Weerdt
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. Infinitely many Nielsen classes in mapping class groups and free-group automorphism groups
    Wenchang Yang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{tabei2026domain,
  title = {{The domain question for the Nielsen-Soelberg group rings: the commutative case, with certified ball checks}},
  author = {Moe Tabei},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.25016},
  eprint = {2609.25016},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25016},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The domain question for the Nielsen-Soelberg group rings: the commutative case, with certified ball checks
AU  - Moe Tabei
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.25016
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25016
AB  - Nielsen and Soelberg exhibited three torsion-free groups G_1, G_2, G_3 carrying 8-element sets without unique products, and asked whether any of the group rings R[G_i], R a domain, is a domain. We record that for every commutative domain R the answer is affirmative for all three groups: each G_i is virtually nilpotent, so the theorem of Kropholler, Linnell and Moody applies over every field, in every characteristic, and commutative coefficients reduce to the fraction field. Every ingredient is in the literature except the nilpotent structure of the relevant finite-index subgroup of G_2, which is supplied by the certified computational model of our companion paper (arXiv:2607.19687). The question therefore remains open exactly for noncommutative coefficient domains, where the unique-product mechanism -- the only known ring-independent one -- is precisely what these groups are constructed to lack. As a complement we report machine-checkable, DRAT-certified verifications that F_2[G_i] has no zero divisors with both supports in explicit balls of the defining generating sets, obtained by propositional reasoning alone, independent of the K-theoretic machinery; we state precisely what these certificates do and do not add.
ER  -