A narrative systematic review of snakebite risk factors in Kenya, incorporating grey and academic literature
- 1Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
- 2Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Snakebite is a neglected tropical disease, the drivers of which remain poorly understood and controlled in many countries. Incorporating grey literature has been recommended by previous academic publications on snakebite, due to the limited studies available globally, to provide a more accurate understanding of burden. In this review we aimed to identify and better understand risk factors that are associated with increased risk of snakebite, specifically across Kenya, using both grey and academic literature sources. We appraised academic studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, while grey literature was assessed using the Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Date and Significance guidelines. This systematic review synthesised evidence from 16 eligible peer-reviewed studies and 4 grey literature sources (1994–2025) examining determinants of snakebite risk and outcomes across Kenya. Given the limited number of eligible studies and heterogeneity of study types we conducted a thematic narrative synthesis. A total of 25 variables clustered into four domains were assessed, spanning human demographic factors, and environmental exposures. This study concurred with established literature on factors such as rurality, poverty and farming increasing snakebite risk, but also highlights discrepancies with global data. Several studies reported no seasonal variation or more bites in the dry season; bites were reported to occur equally in the day and the night in some studies; and no significant gender difference was observed in several reports. Overall findings converged on a consistent picture, snakebite envenoming in Kenya is concentrated among poorer, rural populations, and is more consistently linked to livelihoods and housing conditions, than seasonality or temporality. Actual burden and species responsible for bites remain poorly understood.
Related
- Prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of late gadolinium enhancement and narrative literature review of parametric mapping.
- Clinical recognition, management, and research progress of infantile perianal protrusion: a narrative review and literature-based case aggregation
- Current applications of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation in orthopedics: a narrative review of the literature
- A Systematic Review of Spaced Repetition, Retrieval Practice, and Academic Performance in Undergraduate Medical Students
- Effects of physical activity on executive function components and academic performance in children aged 6–12 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BibTeX
@article{collinson2026narrative,
title = {{A narrative systematic review of snakebite risk factors in Kenya, incorporating grey and academic literature}},
author = {Eleanor Collinson and Rikki Gumbs and Shelley Lees and Alex Bowmer},
journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0006344},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006344},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A narrative systematic review of snakebite risk factors in Kenya, incorporating grey and academic literature
AU - Eleanor Collinson
AU - Rikki Gumbs
AU - Shelley Lees
AU - Alex Bowmer
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - PLOS Global Public Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006344
UR - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006344
AB - Snakebite is a neglected tropical disease, the drivers of which remain poorly understood and controlled in many countries. Incorporating grey literature has been recommended by previous academic publications on snakebite, due to the limited studies available globally, to provide a more accurate understanding of burden. In this review we aimed to identify and better understand risk factors that are associated with increased risk of snakebite, specifically across Kenya, using both grey and academic literature sources. We appraised academic studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, while grey literature was assessed using the Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Date and Significance guidelines. This systematic review synthesised evidence from 16 eligible peer-reviewed studies and 4 grey literature sources (1994–2025) examining determinants of snakebite risk and outcomes across Kenya. Given the limited number of eligible studies and heterogeneity of study types we conducted a thematic narrative synthesis. A total of 25 variables clustered into four domains were assessed, spanning human demographic factors, and environmental exposures. This study concurred with established literature on factors such as rurality, poverty and farming increasing snakebite risk, but also highlights discrepancies with global data. Several studies reported no seasonal variation or more bites in the dry season; bites were reported to occur equally in the day and the night in some studies; and no significant gender difference was observed in several reports. Overall findings converged on a consistent picture, snakebite envenoming in Kenya is concentrated among poorer, rural populations, and is more consistently linked to livelihoods and housing conditions, than seasonality or temporality. Actual burden and species responsible for bites remain poorly understood.
SN - 2767-3375
ER -