Improving the CLASSIC (v1.8) snow model to better simulate Arctic snowpacks
- 1Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (Trois-Rivières, Canada)
- 2Université Laval (Québec, Canada)
Abstract
This study enhances the snow model of the Canadian Land Surface Scheme including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC), with a particular focus on Arctic environments. Key snow model physics improvements include adjustments to the thermal conductivity at the top of the first soil layer, a revised computation of the temperature at the snow–soil interface (hereafter, bottom snow temperature), and the addition of a windless exchange coefficient in sensible heat flux calculations. Arctic-specific adaptations include blowing-snow sublimation losses, a new snow compaction scheme, and snow thermal conductivity parameterization. Evaluations at seven mid-latitude and alpine sites (SnowMIP sites) and three Arctic sites (Bylot Island, Umiujaq, and Trail Valley Creek) show that these enhancements improve the overall simulated snowpack characteristics and soil temperatures across both SnowMIP and Arctic sites. The revised bottom snow temperature yields better agreement between simulated and observed snow and bottom snow temperatures. The new windless exchange coefficient reduced the surface temperature RMSE from 3.50 to 1.93 °C on average across all sites. The improved snow compaction scheme reduces the snow depth biases from 12.0 to 0.1 cm on average across the Arctic sites and improves the simulated snow densities while not degrading the overall model performance at the SnowMIP sites. Blowing-snow sublimation had a negligible effect at most sites, except at the wind-exposed sites of Umiujaq, Trail Valley Creek, and Senator Beck, decreasing snow depth on average by 2–4 cm. Adding a new snow thermal conductivity parameterization – combined with all previous developments – reduces the RMSE of the simulated soil temperatures from 5.3 to 3.0 °C on average at all Arctic sites. Our new developments demonstrate the ability of a single-layer snow model to reasonably reproduce Arctic bulk snowpack characteristics, while maintaining good performance at the SnowMIP sites. Inherent uncertainties remain in the forcing datasets, especially due to the harsh Arctic environment characterized by strong winds, snow redistribution, frost, and polar night. Future model developments will focus on spatial-scale simulations across the whole Arctic, with particular attention to snow cover fraction parameterizations to better capture sub-grid-scale spatial heterogeneity in Arctic environments.
Versions
Related
- Balancing subsurface complexity and model simplicity: How much spatially distributed field data is needed to simulate streamflow in a subalpine critical zone
- Beyond Classic Carcinogens: Micro- and Nanoplastics (MNPs) as Pervasive Factors in Cancer Risk
- Arctic climate tipping points under delayed CO2 emissions mitigation
- Reconciling Arctic sea ice roughness across four observing platforms: a resolution transfer function and the stability of spectral shape over six decades
- Two large unstable slopes in West Greenland illustrates an emerging Arctic tsunami hazard
BibTeX
@article{lalande2026improving,
title = {{Improving the CLASSIC (v1.8) snow model to better simulate Arctic snowpacks}},
author = {Mickaël Lalande and Alexandre Roy and Libo Wang and Diana Verseghy and Vincent Vionnet and Florent Dominé and Christophe Kinnard},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5194/gmd-19-9581-2026},
url = {https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/9581/2026/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Improving the CLASSIC (v1.8) snow model to better simulate Arctic snowpacks
AU - Mickaël Lalande
AU - Alexandre Roy
AU - Libo Wang
AU - Diana Verseghy
AU - Vincent Vionnet
AU - Florent Dominé
AU - Christophe Kinnard
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Geoscientific Model Development
DO - 10.5194/gmd-19-9581-2026
UR - https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/9581/2026/
AB - This study enhances the snow model of the Canadian Land Surface Scheme including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC), with a particular focus on Arctic environments. Key snow model physics improvements include adjustments to the thermal conductivity at the top of the first soil layer, a revised computation of the temperature at the snow–soil interface (hereafter, bottom snow temperature), and the addition of a windless exchange coefficient in sensible heat flux calculations. Arctic-specific adaptations include blowing-snow sublimation losses, a new snow compaction scheme, and snow thermal conductivity parameterization. Evaluations at seven mid-latitude and alpine sites (SnowMIP sites) and three Arctic sites (Bylot Island, Umiujaq, and Trail Valley Creek) show that these enhancements improve the overall simulated snowpack characteristics and soil temperatures across both SnowMIP and Arctic sites. The revised bottom snow temperature yields better agreement between simulated and observed snow and bottom snow temperatures. The new windless exchange coefficient reduced the surface temperature RMSE from 3.50 to 1.93 °C on average across all sites. The improved snow compaction scheme reduces the snow depth biases from 12.0 to 0.1 cm on average across the Arctic sites and improves the simulated snow densities while not degrading the overall model performance at the SnowMIP sites. Blowing-snow sublimation had a negligible effect at most sites, except at the wind-exposed sites of Umiujaq, Trail Valley Creek, and Senator Beck, decreasing snow depth on average by 2–4 cm. Adding a new snow thermal conductivity parameterization – combined with all previous developments – reduces the RMSE of the simulated soil temperatures from 5.3 to 3.0 °C on average at all Arctic sites. Our new developments demonstrate the ability of a single-layer snow model to reasonably reproduce Arctic bulk snowpack characteristics, while maintaining good performance at the SnowMIP sites. Inherent uncertainties remain in the forcing datasets, especially due to the harsh Arctic environment characterized by strong winds, snow redistribution, frost, and polar night. Future model developments will focus on spatial-scale simulations across the whole Arctic, with particular attention to snow cover fraction parameterizations to better capture sub-grid-scale spatial heterogeneity in Arctic environments.
SN - 1991-9603
SN - 1991-959X
ER -