On Gauge Gravity's 'Hypermomentum Challenge' to the Geometric Trinity
Abstract
Claims concerning a dynamical equivalence between general relativity and two reformulations of it, in which gravity is encoded in torsion and non-metricity respectively, have attracted some attention. If taken to be true, this 'Geometric Trinity' suggests that it is impossible to determine, even in principle, whether one inhabits a spacetime solution possessing curvature, torsion or non-metricity (insofar as the probes of geometry are paths of test particles). This claim is in direct tension with the long tradition of studying gravity as a gauge theory, in which distinct geometric attributes couple to distinct properties of matter (such as energy-momentum to curvature and spin angular momentum to torsion). In this short paper, I compare these two conflicting frameworks for geometrizing spacetime and describe the precise source, nature and implications of their disagreement. The equivalence claim holds only under a substantive restriction on the matter sector, namely that matter does not couple to an independent affine connection. Because the relevant couplings remain beyond current empirical reach, the choice between the frameworks turns on a trade-off among ontological, epistemic, and methodological forms of parsimony.
Related
- The Pre-geometric Origin of Geometric Trinity of Gravity
- Vacuum stability in Geometric Trinity of Gravity
- Canonical Quantization and Constraint Algebra of Weyl-Invariant Gravity in a Conformal Gauge: Emergence of a Geometric Cosmological Term
- Trinity of Carrollian Gravity: Dynamically Equivalent Formulations of Magnetic Carrollian Gravity
- Quantum Gravity in the Landau background gauge
BibTeX
@misc{tiwari2026gauge,
title = {{On Gauge Gravity's 'Hypermomentum Challenge' to the Geometric Trinity}},
author = {Kartik Tiwari},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.38292},
eprint = {2609.38292},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38292},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - On Gauge Gravity's 'Hypermomentum Challenge' to the Geometric Trinity
AU - Kartik Tiwari
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/29
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.38292
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38292
AB - Claims concerning a dynamical equivalence between general relativity and two reformulations of it, in which gravity is encoded in torsion and non-metricity respectively, have attracted some attention. If taken to be true, this 'Geometric Trinity' suggests that it is impossible to determine, even in principle, whether one inhabits a spacetime solution possessing curvature, torsion or non-metricity (insofar as the probes of geometry are paths of test particles). This claim is in direct tension with the long tradition of studying gravity as a gauge theory, in which distinct geometric attributes couple to distinct properties of matter (such as energy-momentum to curvature and spin angular momentum to torsion). In this short paper, I compare these two conflicting frameworks for geometrizing spacetime and describe the precise source, nature and implications of their disagreement. The equivalence claim holds only under a substantive restriction on the matter sector, namely that matter does not couple to an independent affine connection. Because the relevant couplings remain beyond current empirical reach, the choice between the frameworks turns on a trade-off among ontological, epistemic, and methodological forms of parsimony.
ER -