Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Patch Attention Wisely: Understanding Patch Length in Attention-Based Forecasting

Abstract

Attention-based time series forecasters commonly group consecutive observations into patches. Patch length is known to have a substantial impact on forecasting performance, yet its selection remains largely empirical. We develop a theoretical framework that explains why patch length matters for forecasting accuracy and provides a principled basis for its selection. For linear state-space models, we derive an exact factorization of the forecasting coefficient matrix that separates forecast dynamics from filtering dynamics. We show that dominance of a single forecast component at long horizons does not generally imply a rank-one representation. This explains why longer horizons alone need not reduce representational complexity. We combine the factorization with estimation bounds to develop a patch-selection criterion that balances representation and estimation errors under temporal dependence. Our analysis establishes conditions under which balanced patching is justified and clarifies how predictive structure, head count, training sample size, and long-run dependence enter the selection criterion.

Related

  1. BitterBuster: A virtual world for understanding naturalistic patch foraging
    John P Kasarda, Jyotika Bahuguna, Angela Zhang +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceZoology & animal behaviourPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  2. Understanding axial attention in TSFMs through single location regression
    Andrei-Tiberiu Pantea, Aymeric Dieuleveut
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Convergent Stochastic Training of Multi-Headed Attention and Understanding LoRA
    Zhengkai Sun, Dibyakanti Kumar, Alejandro F Frangi +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsProbabilityarXiv
  4. Morpheus-2.0: Multiscale Probabilistic Forecasting with Dual-Axis Attention
    Aakriti, Manoj Cherukumalli, Prathamesh Patil +5
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Choosing Stimuli Wisely by Using Individual Differences: A Step-by-Step Tutorial for the One-Stimulus-Per-Factor Principle in Vision Science and Optometric Assessment
    David Henry Peterzell
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsOSF
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026patch,
  title = {{Patch Attention Wisely: Understanding Patch Length in Attention-Based Forecasting}},
  author = {Junyu Chen and Likai Chen and Weining Wang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.08160},
  eprint = {2611.08160},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08160},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Patch Attention Wisely: Understanding Patch Length in Attention-Based Forecasting
AU  - Junyu Chen
AU  - Likai Chen
AU  - Weining Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.08160
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08160
AB  - Attention-based time series forecasters commonly group consecutive observations into patches. Patch length is known to have a substantial impact on forecasting performance, yet its selection remains largely empirical. We develop a theoretical framework that explains why patch length matters for forecasting accuracy and provides a principled basis for its selection. For linear state-space models, we derive an exact factorization of the forecasting coefficient matrix that separates forecast dynamics from filtering dynamics. We show that dominance of a single forecast component at long horizons does not generally imply a rank-one representation. This explains why longer horizons alone need not reduce representational complexity. We combine the factorization with estimation bounds to develop a patch-selection criterion that balances representation and estimation errors under temporal dependence. Our analysis establishes conditions under which balanced patching is justified and clarifies how predictive structure, head count, training sample size, and long-run dependence enter the selection criterion.
ER  -