Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Estimating Treatment Effects in Complex Disease Dynamics: Immortal Time, Varying Hazards, and Multiple Time Scales

Abstract

In observational survival studies, delayed treatment initiation can induce immortal time bias in effect estimation when treatment groups are defined by future uptake. Despite originating from distinct predictive or causal inference paradigms, time-dependent approaches (e.g. the time-dependent Cox model, landmark supermodel, multi-state model, and g-formula) are often treated as interchangeable in applied research when addressing immortal time bias. These models effectively reclassify person-time according to time-varying exposure, yet the interpretation of their target estimands depends on assumptions about the underlying disease process and clinically relevant time scales. We study effect estimation for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation under baseline intention-to-transplant strategies in acute myeloid leukemia (i.e. transplantation is planned for a prespecified time, subject to the patient's eligibility), within a multi-state framework allowing time-inhomogeneous Markov, semi-Markov, and state arrival extended semi-Markov dynamics. Using target trial emulation, we benchmark, on the probability scale, estimates derived from Cox-type time-dependent models and the g-formula against the corresponding theoretical values implied by the stochastic data-generating process. Decomposing the partial likelihood score, we show that single-time-scale models can be systematically biased when death intensities from different originating states are not proportional on a common time scale, as can occur when the clock is reset after intermediate events. We quantify these findings in a phase III simulation study and illustrate their implications in an application to data from three acute myeloid leukemia trials.

Related

  1. Neural ODE enhanced linear mixed effect models for estimating complex association patterns of time-varying covariates with the marker trajectory
    Zhe Aurore Li, Quentin Clairon, Cécilia Samieri +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Estimating Average Treatment Effects with Projected Instrumental Variables
    Shuyuan Chen, Yifan Cui
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Neural ODE enhanced linear mixed effect models for estimating complex association patterns of time-varying covariates with the marker trajectory Supplementary Materials
    Zhe Aurore Li, Quentin Clairon, Cécilia Samieri +3
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
  4. Where to weight? Estimating population causal effects with weighted double score matching in complex surveys
    Yukang Zeng, Guangyu Tong, Jiaqi Tong +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Imputation is all you need: double robustness, semiparametric efficiency, and automatic covariate balance for estimating the average treatment effect
    Fang Han, Peng Ding
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{xu2026estimating,
  title = {{Estimating Treatment Effects in Complex Disease Dynamics: Immortal Time, Varying Hazards, and Multiple Time Scales}},
  author = {Yujun Xu and Ulrich Mansmann},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.35678},
  eprint = {2610.35678},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35678},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Estimating Treatment Effects in Complex Disease Dynamics: Immortal Time, Varying Hazards, and Multiple Time Scales
AU  - Yujun Xu
AU  - Ulrich Mansmann
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.35678
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35678
AB  - In observational survival studies, delayed treatment initiation can induce immortal time bias in effect estimation when treatment groups are defined by future uptake. Despite originating from distinct predictive or causal inference paradigms, time-dependent approaches (e.g. the time-dependent Cox model, landmark supermodel, multi-state model, and g-formula) are often treated as interchangeable in applied research when addressing immortal time bias. These models effectively reclassify person-time according to time-varying exposure, yet the interpretation of their target estimands depends on assumptions about the underlying disease process and clinically relevant time scales. We study effect estimation for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation under baseline intention-to-transplant strategies in acute myeloid leukemia (i.e. transplantation is planned for a prespecified time, subject to the patient's eligibility), within a multi-state framework allowing time-inhomogeneous Markov, semi-Markov, and state arrival extended semi-Markov dynamics. Using target trial emulation, we benchmark, on the probability scale, estimates derived from Cox-type time-dependent models and the g-formula against the corresponding theoretical values implied by the stochastic data-generating process. Decomposing the partial likelihood score, we show that single-time-scale models can be systematically biased when death intensities from different originating states are not proportional on a common time scale, as can occur when the clock is reset after intermediate events. We quantify these findings in a phase III simulation study and illustrate their implications in an application to data from three acute myeloid leukemia trials.
ER  -