Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC surgery

Comparative evaluation of Mannheim Peritonitis Index and Mansoura Scoring System for risk stratification in perforation peritonitis: a prospective study from a resource-limited setting of North India.

  1. 1Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India. [email protected].
  2. 2Department of Surgery, FH Medical College, UP, Agra, India.
  3. 3Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India.

Abstract

Background

Perforation peritonitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies encountered in clinical practice and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Prognostic scoring systems are important for predicting outcomes, guiding management strategies and facilitating surgical audits. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) is a widely used intraoperative scoring system, while the Mansoura Scoring System (MSS) is a newer model based on preoperative inflammatory parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MPI and MSS in predicting mortality and postoperative complications in patients with perforation peritonitis.Materials and methods

A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in the Department of Surgery at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University. A total of 200 patients diagnosed with perforation peritonitis and undergoing surgical intervention were included. MPI and MSS scores were calculated for all patients. Patients were followed up for 30 days postoperatively to evaluate outcomes including mortality, postoperative complications and hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 29. Diagnostic performance of the scoring systems was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results

The mean age of patients ranged widely, with the highest proportion belonging to the 31-40 year age group. Males constituted 69.5% of the study population. The ileum was the most common site of perforation (56.5%), followed by gastric perforation (15%). Higher MPI and MSS scores were significantly associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. MPI demonstrated higher specificity in predicting mortality, whereas MSS showed comparable sensitivity and allowed earlier preoperative risk assessment.Conclusion

Both MPI and MSS are effective prognostic tools for predicting outcomes in perforation peritonitis. While MPI has a better discriminatory ability for predicting mortality due to its incorporation of intraoperative findings, MSS offers the advantage of early preoperative risk stratification using simple laboratory parameters.

Related

  1. Assessment of Nutrition, Anthropometry, and Electrolyte Balance in Patients with Perforation Peritonitis: A Prospective Observational Study
    Rasika Nitin Pathak, Surekha Tushar Nemade, Shubhangi Dinesh Wankhade +2
    Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis caused by Ureaplasma urealyticum : A case report
    Ting Hu, Jinjin Zhang, Geping Yu
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Pancreatic Ascites Complicated by Salmonella Enteritidis Peritonitis: A Diagnostic Challenge and the Role of Surgical Source Control
    Moussa Sylla, Samuel Bamogo, Eric Pappalardo
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis due to Pasteurella multocida: A Rare Case of Stray-Animal Exposure and Fluoroquinolone Resistance
    Melih Tarık Özdemir, Neslihan Arıcı, Elif Gülcan Şenol +2
    Infectious diseases & clinical microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Clinical characteristics and preliminary discriminatory value of low triiodothyronine syndrome in patients with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis : A cross-sectional study
    Jiaxin Liu, Liqiang Lv, Junyuan Xiao +3
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{jameel2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative evaluation of Mannheim Peritonitis Index and Mansoura Scoring System for risk stratification in perforation peritonitis: a prospective study from a resource-limited setting of North India.}},
  author = {Hazique Jameel and Mohammad Habib Raza and Afzal Anees and Mohammad Sadik Akhtar},
  journal = {BMC surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12893-026-03918-9},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902243},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative evaluation of Mannheim Peritonitis Index and Mansoura Scoring System for risk stratification in perforation peritonitis: a prospective study from a resource-limited setting of North India.
AU  - Hazique Jameel
AU  - Mohammad Habib Raza
AU  - Afzal Anees
AU  - Mohammad Sadik Akhtar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC surgery
DO  - 10.1186/s12893-026-03918-9
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902243
AB  - Background  Perforation peritonitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies encountered in clinical practice and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Prognostic scoring systems are important for predicting outcomes, guiding management strategies and facilitating surgical audits. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) is a widely used intraoperative scoring system, while the Mansoura Scoring System (MSS) is a newer model based on preoperative inflammatory parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MPI and MSS in predicting mortality and postoperative complications in patients with perforation peritonitis.Materials and methods  A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in the Department of Surgery at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University. A total of 200 patients diagnosed with perforation peritonitis and undergoing surgical intervention were included. MPI and MSS scores were calculated for all patients. Patients were followed up for 30 days postoperatively to evaluate outcomes including mortality, postoperative complications and hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 29. Diagnostic performance of the scoring systems was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results  The mean age of patients ranged widely, with the highest proportion belonging to the 31-40 year age group. Males constituted 69.5% of the study population. The ileum was the most common site of perforation (56.5%), followed by gastric perforation (15%). Higher MPI and MSS scores were significantly associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. MPI demonstrated higher specificity in predicting mortality, whereas MSS showed comparable sensitivity and allowed earlier preoperative risk assessment.Conclusion  Both MPI and MSS are effective prognostic tools for predicting outcomes in perforation peritonitis. While MPI has a better discriminatory ability for predicting mortality due to its incorporation of intraoperative findings, MSS offers the advantage of early preoperative risk stratification using simple laboratory parameters.
SN  - 1471-2482
ER  -