Framing just agroecological transitions through participatory multistakeholder processes
Abstract
Agroecology, as conceptualised in the thirteen HLPE principles, embeds justice dimensions in the place-based sustainable transition pathways it supports, yet operationalising just agroecological transitions is understudied and remains a design and implementation challenge. In this paper, we apply Schlosberg's four-dimensional justice framework post-hoc, distinguishing distributive, procedural, recognition, and capabilities justice, to six country-level Vision to Action participatory visioning processes conducted under the CGIAR Agroecology Initiative in India, Kenya, Peru, Senegal, Tunisia, and Zimbabwe. Although these processes had not been designed with explicit justice objectives, justice-relevant content emerged across them: competing visions revealed whose values are at stake in the transition; the composition and design of sessions determined whose knowledge shaped transition pathways; and intra-transition trade-offs revealed who bears the costs of change. The analysis revealed shared concerns around food security, fair returns, gender equity, and reduced external input dependence, which took locally specific forms. Capabilities concerns shaped transition pathways more than distributive and recognition claims; and a recurrent tension between visions of input autonomy and pathways of input substitution emerged. Government and private-sector actors were less represented than farmers but were generally assigned significant responsibility for enabling the transition. We argue that participatory multi-stakeholder visioning creates the conditions under which the justice content of agroecological transitions becomes visible, negotiable, and translatable into action planning. Establishing an explicit justice framing ex ante would allow deliberate choices on participant disaggregation while systematic mapping and engagement strategies for absent actors would allow future processes to embed justice-relevant content explicitly from the design stage.
Related
- MiCampo: A Multi-Level Digital Cooperative Infrastructure for Agroecological Planning, Participatory Certification and Territorial Market Coordination
- Innovation processes for the agroecological transition in Maya milpa systems
- Climate change adaptation barriers among beekeepers across agroecological zones in Gedeo, Ethiopia: evidence from problem confrontation index and multinomial regression
- A novel photoperiod-sensitive laying curve for modelling egg production in native chickens and the effect of black soldier fly larvae supplementation under agroecological conditions
- Psychological factors outperform message framing in motivating climate action
BibTeX
@article{canto2026framing,
title = {{Framing just agroecological transitions through participatory multistakeholder processes}},
author = {Genowefa Blundo Canto and Vrindaja Vikram and Thomas Falk and Lisa Elena Fuchs and Vimbayi Grace Petrova Chimonyo and Maria Claudia Tristán Febres and Shweta Gupta and Nadia Bergamini and Aymen Frija and Zied Idoudi and Marc Piraux and Sonali Singh and Bernard Triomphe},
journal = {Outlook On Agriculture},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1177/00307270261477117},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05836315v1},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Framing just agroecological transitions through participatory multistakeholder processes
AU - Genowefa Blundo Canto
AU - Vrindaja Vikram
AU - Thomas Falk
AU - Lisa Elena Fuchs
AU - Vimbayi Grace Petrova Chimonyo
AU - Maria Claudia Tristán Febres
AU - Shweta Gupta
AU - Nadia Bergamini
AU - Aymen Frija
AU - Zied Idoudi
AU - Marc Piraux
AU - Sonali Singh
AU - Bernard Triomphe
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/26
JO - Outlook On Agriculture
DO - 10.1177/00307270261477117
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05836315v1
AB - Agroecology, as conceptualised in the thirteen HLPE principles, embeds justice dimensions in the place-based sustainable transition pathways it supports, yet operationalising just agroecological transitions is understudied and remains a design and implementation challenge. In this paper, we apply Schlosberg's four-dimensional justice framework post-hoc, distinguishing distributive, procedural, recognition, and capabilities justice, to six country-level Vision to Action participatory visioning processes conducted under the CGIAR Agroecology Initiative in India, Kenya, Peru, Senegal, Tunisia, and Zimbabwe. Although these processes had not been designed with explicit justice objectives, justice-relevant content emerged across them: competing visions revealed whose values are at stake in the transition; the composition and design of sessions determined whose knowledge shaped transition pathways; and intra-transition trade-offs revealed who bears the costs of change. The analysis revealed shared concerns around food security, fair returns, gender equity, and reduced external input dependence, which took locally specific forms. Capabilities concerns shaped transition pathways more than distributive and recognition claims; and a recurrent tension between visions of input autonomy and pathways of input substitution emerged. Government and private-sector actors were less represented than farmers but were generally assigned significant responsibility for enabling the transition. We argue that participatory multi-stakeholder visioning creates the conditions under which the justice content of agroecological transitions becomes visible, negotiable, and translatable into action planning. Establishing an explicit justice framing ex ante would allow deliberate choices on participant disaggregation while systematic mapping and engagement strategies for absent actors would allow future processes to embed justice-relevant content explicitly from the design stage.
SN - 0030-7270
SN - 2043-6866
ER -