Clinical severity predominates over routine inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in predicting hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis: internal temporal validation of incremental biomarker value
4 affiliations
- 1College of Acupuncture-Moxibustion, Tuina and Rehabilitation, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
- 2Teaching and Research Office of TCM Internal Medicine, Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College
- 3Changsha Central Hospital
- 4School of Physical Education, Hunan University of Arts and Science
Abstract
Background and Objective: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) remains an important safety concern after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. We evaluated whether routine inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers improve HT prediction beyond clinical features.
Methods: We analyzed 847 thrombolysis-treated admissions from 2020 to 2026. In-hospital imaging-confirmed HT was the primary outcome, and strict 7-day ECASS II-compatible symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was exploratory. Admission date defined derivation ( n = 593; 67 HT events) and internal temporal-validation ( n = 254; 27 HT events) cohorts. The six-variable clinical model included age, baseline NIHSS, atrial fibrillation, large-vessel occlusion, the rapid-glucose field, and onset-to-treatment time. Models added ln(NLR), AIP plus residual cholesterol, or all three biomarkers. Twenty imputed datasets were generated using derivation-fitted imputation models. We assessed discrimination, calibration, Brier score, decision curves, and sensitivity analyses.
Results: HT occurred during 94 of 847 admissions (11.1%). The clinical model yielded AUCs of 0.812 (95% CI 0.761–0.860) in derivation and 0.801 (0.707–0.881) in temporal validation. Adding ln(NLR) increased the validation AUC to 0.818 (ΔAUC +0.017; DeLong p = 0.220). Adding AIP and residual cholesterol yielded an AUC of 0.803 (ΔAUC +0.002; p = 0.818). The full model yielded AUCs of 0.817 in derivation and 0.818 in validation (ΔAUC +0.018; p = 0.346). Baseline NIHSS was independently associated with HT (OR 1.084 per point, 95% CI 1.044–1.126; p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation was independently associated with HT (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.34–5.27; p = 0.005). The biomarkers ln(NLR), AIP, and residual cholesterol were not independently associated with HT. Validation calibration was similar, with a Brier score of 0.081 for both models. Biomarker gains were inconsistent across sensitivity analyses. In the exploratory sICH analysis (37 events), ln(NLR) was associated with sICH (OR 1.89, 1.04–3.42; p = 0.037). Validation included only 12 events, and the AUC increment was not statistically significant ( p = 0.097).
Conclusion: Clinical severity and established clinical features provided most of the predictive information for post-thrombolysis HT. Routine ln(NLR), AIP, and residual cholesterol did not provide sufficiently robust incremental predictive value beyond the clinical model. The NLR–sICH signal remains exploratory and requires external validation.
Related
- A cumulative biochemical profile of low uric acid and high total bilirubin is associated with hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study
- Gut microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolites and inflammatory factors enhance prediction of early neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients: a comparative model study
- Extending the Treatment Window for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Success rate and determinants of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke from the Malaysia National Stroke Registry
- Machine learning-based models to predict 90-day non-excellent functional outcomes among patients with mild acute ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis
BibTeX
@article{liang2026clinical,
title = {{Clinical severity predominates over routine inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in predicting hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis: internal temporal validation of incremental biomarker value}},
author = {Huan Liang and Baiyu Zeng and Jingquan Wang and Lizhen Yi and Linxing Huang and Ziyan Lin and Cai Zhou and Zenghui Yue},
journal = {Frontiers in Neurology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1940110},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1940110/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Clinical severity predominates over routine inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in predicting hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis: internal temporal validation of incremental biomarker value
AU - Huan Liang
AU - Baiyu Zeng
AU - Jingquan Wang
AU - Lizhen Yi
AU - Linxing Huang
AU - Ziyan Lin
AU - Cai Zhou
AU - Zenghui Yue
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1940110
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1940110/full
AB - Background and Objective: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) remains an important safety concern after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. We evaluated whether routine inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers improve HT prediction beyond clinical features. Methods: We analyzed 847 thrombolysis-treated admissions from 2020 to 2026. In-hospital imaging-confirmed HT was the primary outcome, and strict 7-day ECASS II-compatible symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was exploratory. Admission date defined derivation ( n = 593; 67 HT events) and internal temporal-validation ( n = 254; 27 HT events) cohorts. The six-variable clinical model included age, baseline NIHSS, atrial fibrillation, large-vessel occlusion, the rapid-glucose field, and onset-to-treatment time. Models added ln(NLR), AIP plus residual cholesterol, or all three biomarkers. Twenty imputed datasets were generated using derivation-fitted imputation models. We assessed discrimination, calibration, Brier score, decision curves, and sensitivity analyses. Results: HT occurred during 94 of 847 admissions (11.1%). The clinical model yielded AUCs of 0.812 (95% CI 0.761–0.860) in derivation and 0.801 (0.707–0.881) in temporal validation. Adding ln(NLR) increased the validation AUC to 0.818 (ΔAUC +0.017; DeLong p = 0.220). Adding AIP and residual cholesterol yielded an AUC of 0.803 (ΔAUC +0.002; p = 0.818). The full model yielded AUCs of 0.817 in derivation and 0.818 in validation (ΔAUC +0.018; p = 0.346). Baseline NIHSS was independently associated with HT (OR 1.084 per point, 95% CI 1.044–1.126; p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation was independently associated with HT (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.34–5.27; p = 0.005). The biomarkers ln(NLR), AIP, and residual cholesterol were not independently associated with HT. Validation calibration was similar, with a Brier score of 0.081 for both models. Biomarker gains were inconsistent across sensitivity analyses. In the exploratory sICH analysis (37 events), ln(NLR) was associated with sICH (OR 1.89, 1.04–3.42; p = 0.037). Validation included only 12 events, and the AUC increment was not statistically significant ( p = 0.097). Conclusion: Clinical severity and established clinical features provided most of the predictive information for post-thrombolysis HT. Routine ln(NLR), AIP, and residual cholesterol did not provide sufficiently robust incremental predictive value beyond the clinical model. The NLR–sICH signal remains exploratory and requires external validation.
SN - 1664-2295
ER -