A responsivity theory of call timing patterns in bat echolocation
Abstract
Background: The temporal patterning of bat echolocation is extensively characterised, but a general mathematical account linking call timing to acoustic propagation, relative motion, and behaviourally selected information remains incomplete.
Results: We present the responsivity framework, which represents each call event as a delayed active-sensing cycle comprising an acoustic acquisition interval and a subsequent behavioural interval. Their proportional relation is described by the responsivity coefficient, kr k r , connecting call timing to effective anchor distance, relative velocity, call duration, and the selected echo window. Analytical derivation, call-by-call simulation, internal validation, and comparison with field recordings show how the framework generates hyperbolic call-rate–distance relationships, shifts approach timing with echo-window selection, and places the terminal buzz at the near-target limit of the same timing process. Responsivity and kinematics have separable terminal effects: kr k r constrains terminal update density and attainable call rate, whereas closing velocity determines the time available within the terminal region. A buzz-readiness state precedes the complete expression of buzz, and transient sonar strobe groups emerge under multi-target anchor allocation without an explicit grouping rule. Field recordings show broad correspondence with simulations in the organisation of movement, call timing and call duration, and illustrate conditional evaluation of acquisition-window and anchor assumptions.
Conclusions: Responsivity theory provides a process-based descriptor of echolocation timing and a diagnostic framework for hypothesis generation and empirical testing. The framework identifies the measurements needed to test how selected acoustic information governs subsequent call timing.
Related
- Horseshoe Bats Recognise the Sex of Conspecifics from Their Echolocation Calls
- Association of early childhood lifestyle patterns with overweight in preschoolers and timing of adiposity rebound
- A Sparse Modal Representation for Dolphin Echolocation Transients
- Bats Could Learn Three-Dimensional Echolocation Using Echoacoustic Flow
- Self-organized spectral adjustment in echolocation sounds within group-flying bats.
BibTeX
@article{umadi2026responsivity,
title = {{A responsivity theory of call timing patterns in bat echolocation}},
author = {Ravi Umadi and Uwe Firzlaff},
journal = {BMC Biology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s12915-026-02774-6},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12915-026-02774-6},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A responsivity theory of call timing patterns in bat echolocation
AU - Ravi Umadi
AU - Uwe Firzlaff
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/31
JO - BMC Biology
DO - 10.1186/s12915-026-02774-6
UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12915-026-02774-6
AB - Background: The temporal patterning of bat echolocation is extensively characterised, but a general mathematical account linking call timing to acoustic propagation, relative motion, and behaviourally selected information remains incomplete. Results: We present the responsivity framework, which represents each call event as a delayed active-sensing cycle comprising an acoustic acquisition interval and a subsequent behavioural interval. Their proportional relation is described by the responsivity coefficient, k_r k r , connecting call timing to effective anchor distance, relative velocity, call duration, and the selected echo window. Analytical derivation, call-by-call simulation, internal validation, and comparison with field recordings show how the framework generates hyperbolic call-rate–distance relationships, shifts approach timing with echo-window selection, and places the terminal buzz at the near-target limit of the same timing process. Responsivity and kinematics have separable terminal effects: k_r k r constrains terminal update density and attainable call rate, whereas closing velocity determines the time available within the terminal region. A buzz-readiness state precedes the complete expression of buzz, and transient sonar strobe groups emerge under multi-target anchor allocation without an explicit grouping rule. Field recordings show broad correspondence with simulations in the organisation of movement, call timing and call duration, and illustrate conditional evaluation of acquisition-window and anchor assumptions. Conclusions: Responsivity theory provides a process-based descriptor of echolocation timing and a diagnostic framework for hypothesis generation and empirical testing. The framework identifies the measurements needed to test how selected acoustic information governs subsequent call timing.
SN - 1741-7007
ER -