Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,273 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0HAL

Synthetic data for open medical research: what practitioners should know

Abstract

Publicly releasing research data is at the core of the open science principles. In medical research, however, this practice conflicts with confidentiality requirements for the collected data. One appealing solution to this dilemma is to release altered versions of these data instead of the original ones. Synthetic data are gaining increasing attention for such uses by clinicians, statisticians, and ethicists in the healthcare domain; yet, this interest is slow to materialize. One reason for that is a lack of familiarity among practitioners with synthetic data, in part explained by their abstract and technical nature. In this article, we address this need by reviewing, in a rigorous yet accessible way, the main ethical, technical, and logistical aspects of data synthesis that may be relevant to non-specialist practitioners who wish to engage with synthetic data in support of open research. In addition to the general principles for generating and evaluating synthetic data, this includes the current challenges that still hinder their democratization, as well as some research directions to overcome them.

Related

  1. Synthetic data for open medical research: current challenges and perspectives
    Rémy Chapelle, Bruno Falissard, Mohammed Sedki
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
  2. Should I Use This Synthetic Dataset for Training? How to Test with Minimal Real Data
    Zhenyu Tao, Wei Xu, Xiaohu You +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Accuracy Is Not Risk: Why Medical AI Should Not Report Only Its Most Likely Label
    Jeffrey Humpherys, Makoto Jones
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. SynForecast: Controlled Synthetic Time Series for Forecasting Research
    Olivier Sprangers, Cristian Challu, Jan Rathfelder +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Beyond an Ethos or Inflexible Checklist of Research Practices: Grounding Open Science in a Biomedical Research Ethics Framework
    P. Priscilla Lui
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
BibTeX
@misc{chapelle2026synthetic,
  title = {{Synthetic data for open medical research: what practitioners should know}},
  author = {Rémy Chapelle and Bruno Falissard and Mohammed Sedki},
  howpublished = {HAL},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05692285v2},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Synthetic data for open medical research: what practitioners should know
AU  - Rémy Chapelle
AU  - Bruno Falissard
AU  - Mohammed Sedki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - HAL
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05692285v2
AB  - Publicly releasing research data is at the core of the open science principles. In medical research, however, this practice conflicts with confidentiality requirements for the collected data. One appealing solution to this dilemma is to release altered versions of these data instead of the original ones. Synthetic data are gaining increasing attention for such uses by clinicians, statisticians, and ethicists in the healthcare domain; yet, this interest is slow to materialize. One reason for that is a lack of familiarity among practitioners with synthetic data, in part explained by their abstract and technical nature. In this article, we address this need by reviewing, in a rigorous yet accessible way, the main ethical, technical, and logistical aspects of data synthesis that may be relevant to non-specialist practitioners who wish to engage with synthetic data in support of open research. In addition to the general principles for generating and evaluating synthetic data, this includes the current challenges that still hinder their democratization, as well as some research directions to overcome them.
ER  -