Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Effective Existence Across Scales: Operator-Invariant Admission, History Transport and Bidirectional Recovery Closure

  1. 1Independent Researcher, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

When does a persistent relational organization become an effective dynamical degree of freedom at a higher scale? We formulate admission as a role-relative, non-compensatory test requiring predictive closure, intervention consistency, retained-history sufficiency, recovery preservation and, for propagation claims, causal-lineage continuity. The merged theorem layer adds four distinctions that passive prediction alone cannot establish: quotient closure does not guarantee realizable transition lifting; state sufficiency depends on the declared operator family; history transport must commute with cross-scale updates; and recovery equivalence requires bidirectional simulation together with safety and lineage preservation. These results are formal under their stated finite-state and task assumptions. The associated computational results remain simulation-level evidence, and the mapping from admitted relational structures to physical entities remains open. The framework therefore supplies a falsifiable admission and recovery gate without asserting that every admitted structure is a physical particle or a universal renormalization group.

Related

  1. Architecting Anisotropic Force‐Responsive Bidirectional High‐Contrast Three‐Color Fluorescence Switches via Effective Molecular Modulation for High‐Security Information Storage
    Yijie Zou, Zhao Chen, Shuang Li +5
    Advanced SciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  2. Force Induces a Collective Inactivity in Dyneins to Auto-Regulate Bidirectional Transport of Vesicles
    D. Chaudhury, A. Kumar, P. Sanghavi +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textCell biologybioRxiv
  3. Can one feel the existence of a non-trivial invariant measure?
    Yannic Steenbeck
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsDynamical systemsarXiv
  4. Bi-invariant Geodesic Regression: Existence, Uniqueness, and Convergence
    Martin Hanik, Christoph von Tycowicz
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyStatisticsarXiv
  5. On the parabolic Φ34 model for the harmonic oscillator II: global existence and invariant measures
    Aurélien Deya, Reika Fukuizumi, Laurent Thomann
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsProbabilityHAL
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026effective,
  title = {{Effective Existence Across Scales: Operator-Invariant Admission, History Transport and Bidirectional Recovery Closure}},
  author = {Yanghua Wang},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23471873},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23471873},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Effective Existence Across Scales: Operator-Invariant Admission, History Transport and Bidirectional Recovery Closure
AU  - Yanghua Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23471873
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23471873
AB  - When does a persistent relational organization become an effective dynamical degree of freedom at a higher scale? We formulate admission as a role-relative, non-compensatory test requiring predictive closure, intervention consistency, retained-history sufficiency, recovery preservation and, for propagation claims, causal-lineage continuity. The merged theorem layer adds four distinctions that passive prediction alone cannot establish: quotient closure does not guarantee realizable transition lifting; state sufficiency depends on the declared operator family; history transport must commute with cross-scale updates; and recovery equivalence requires bidirectional simulation together with safety and lineage preservation. These results are formal under their stated finite-state and task assumptions. The associated computational results remain simulation-level evidence, and the mapping from admitted relational structures to physical entities remains open. The framework therefore supplies a falsifiable admission and recovery gate without asserting that every admitted structure is a physical particle or a universal renormalization group.
ER  -