Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0EarthArXiv

One island, three countries: aquaculture ponds explain the cross-border gap in mangrove loss on Borneo

Abstract

Borneo's mangroves share one coastline, climate and sediment regime, yet they are governed by three countries. Using the annual Global Mangrove Watch v4.1 series and open data, this study asks why mangrove in Indonesian Kalimantan is lost faster than in Malaysian Borneo and Brunei, and tests three explanations: protected-area performance, conversion pathways and El Niño sea-level fall. Between 2010 and 2020, Kalimantan lost 1.23% of its mangrove a year, against 0.43 to 0.74% in Malaysian Borneo and 0.50% in Brunei; it held 59% of the island's mangrove and 77% of its gross loss. Matched comparisons show long-standing strict protected areas reduced loss in Malaysian Borneo by about 2 percentage points but had no detectable effect in Kalimantan. Protection nonetheless explains little of the gap: 84% of it arises outside protected areas, and Sabah's 2015 upgrades of low-loss production reserves to full protection added nothing measurable. Classifying what replaced mangrove lost from 2000 to 2024 shows that conversion to aquaculture ponds, concentrated in the early 2000s, accounts for all of Kalimantan's 15.9-point excess loss, while loss away from ponds was similar in total on both sides of the border (clearing in Kalimantan and Sarawak, mostly edge change in Sabah) and oil palm replaced little mangrove overall. Annual loss outside conversion was lowest in El Niño years and highest in high-sea-level years, consistent with humid mangroves buffered against El Niño sea-level fall. Reducing Borneo's mangrove loss therefore depends on governing pond expansion outside protected areas more than on adding protected areas.

Related

  1. Assessment of trace metal contamination in mangrove sediments—a case study from Guadeloupe Island, Caribbean Sea
    Edlyne Colletin, Melissa Barrast, Olivier Gros +3
    Environmental Monitoring and AssessmentPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Qualitative risk assessment of Japanese encephalitis virus introduction and transmission in Pacific Island countries and territories
    Eloise B. Skinner, Amanda K. Murphy, Fan Yu +7
    PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyZoology & animal behaviourPLOS
  3. Mangrove-Derived Halotolerant Endophytic Bacteria Confer Strain-Specific and Consortium-Mediated Salt Tolerance in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Nagarathnamma Yammanuri, Subramanyam Reddy Chinreddy, Preetham Naik KT +3
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  4. Unexpected expansion and regrowth in Earth’s mangrove forests over the past four decades
    Zhen Zhang, Nicholas Murray, Xiao‐Peng Song +9
    SciencePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text22 citedEcologyOpenAlex
  5. Epigenetic nutrition in aquaculture: The emerging role of Artemia as a bioencapsulation vehicle
    Yathish Ramena, Arielle Shelby, Grace Ramena
    Comparative Immunology ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{tai2026island,
  title = {{One island, three countries: aquaculture ponds explain the cross-border gap in mangrove loss on Borneo}},
  author = {Lik Ren Tai},
  howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.31223/x57r6f},
  url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15906/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - One island, three countries: aquaculture ponds explain the cross-border gap in mangrove loss on Borneo
AU  - Lik Ren Tai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - EarthArXiv
DO  - 10.31223/x57r6f
UR  - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15906/
AB  - Borneo's mangroves share one coastline, climate and sediment regime, yet they are governed by three countries. Using the annual Global Mangrove Watch v4.1 series and open data, this study asks why mangrove in Indonesian Kalimantan is lost faster than in Malaysian Borneo and Brunei, and tests three explanations: protected-area performance, conversion pathways and El Niño sea-level fall. Between 2010 and 2020, Kalimantan lost 1.23% of its mangrove a year, against 0.43 to 0.74% in Malaysian Borneo and 0.50% in Brunei; it held 59% of the island's mangrove and 77% of its gross loss. Matched comparisons show long-standing strict protected areas reduced loss in Malaysian Borneo by about 2 percentage points but had no detectable effect in Kalimantan. Protection nonetheless explains little of the gap: 84% of it arises outside protected areas, and Sabah's 2015 upgrades of low-loss production reserves to full protection added nothing measurable. Classifying what replaced mangrove lost from 2000 to 2024 shows that conversion to aquaculture ponds, concentrated in the early 2000s, accounts for all of Kalimantan's 15.9-point excess loss, while loss away from ponds was similar in total on both sides of the border (clearing in Kalimantan and Sarawak, mostly edge change in Sabah) and oil palm replaced little mangrove overall. Annual loss outside conversion was lowest in El Niño years and highest in high-sea-level years, consistent with humid mangroves buffered against El Niño sea-level fall. Reducing Borneo's mangrove loss therefore depends on governing pond expansion outside protected areas more than on adding protected areas.
ER  -