Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,595 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Surgical strategies for external auditory canal cholesteatoma based on the He staging system: a retrospective study

  1. 1Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Wuhan No.1 Hospital (Wuhan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine), No. 215 Zhongshan Avenue, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022 China
  2. 2Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Jianshi County People’s Hospital, Jianshi, China

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate individualized surgical treatment strategies and clinical management experience for external auditory canal cholesteatoma (EACC) based on the He staging system.

Methods: Clinical data from 59 patients (61 ears) with EACC who underwent surgical treatment at Wuhan No. 1 Hospital from September 2019 to July 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent a preoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) examination and were staged according to the He staging system (Stage I, 8 ears; Stage II, 33 ears; Stage IIIA, 11 ears; Stage IIIB, 5 ears; and Stage IIIC, 4 ears). Individualized surgeries, including lesion resection via endoscopic ear surgery, canaloplasty, tympanoplasty, and mastoid surgery, were performed accordingly. Regular postoperative follow-up was conducted to evaluate therapeutic outcomes and complications.

Results: Postoperative pathological examinations confirmed cholesteatoma in all patients. During the follow-up period of 7 months to 2 years, recurrence occurred in 2 ears (3.28%, both of which were Stage II cases), which were cured after revision surgery. Postoperative complications included external auditory canal infection in 3 ears (4.92%) and restenosis in 2 ears (3.28%), all of which resolved after appropriate management. Additionally, 3 ears (4.92%) exhibited wide external auditory canal cavities postoperatively, with one accompanied by meatal stenosis. Among these patients, two improved after the application of topical medication and close follow-up, while one developed mild facial palsy (House–Brackmann grade II) triggered by acute external otitis and recovered well after revision canaloplasty, with a satisfactory cavity morphology.

Conclusion: The He staging system provides practical guidance for preoperative evaluations and the formulation of surgical strategies for patients with EACC. Stage-based individualized surgery effectively achieves lesion clearance and reduces recurrence rates. Intraoperative attention to the external auditory meatus and postoperative recognition of and intervention in the “sequelae stage” are crucial for ensuring favorable long-term outcomes.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10510-7.

Related

  1. Use of the ORBEYE™ Exoscope for the Treatment of Presumed Postoperative Cholesteatoma of the External Auditory Canal: A Case Report
    Carlotta Liberale, Arianna Burato, Livio Presutti +2
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  2. Treatment of External Auditory Canal Hemangioma by Surgical Excision and Flap Reconstruction: 2 Case Reports.
    Qian Zhang, Wenjin Wu, Linrui Chen +11
    The American journal of case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  3. Clinical features of external auditory canal foreign bodies in children : A retrospective analysis of 678 cases
    Zhijuan Ling, Ping Xiao, Lihua Ye +2
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  4. Evaluating long-term recurrence of cholesteatoma following primary surgery: an umbrella review of surgical techniques and patient factors
    Edi Handoko, Rizki Ekaputra Handoko, Ahmad Dian Wahyudi
    The Journal of Laryngology and OtologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Perioperative Outcomes of Multivessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularization at a Specialized Center: A Retrospective Cohort of Complete Surgical and Planned Hybrid Strategies
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{yao2026surgical,
  title = {{Surgical strategies for external auditory canal cholesteatoma based on the He staging system: a retrospective study}},
  author = {Linli Yao and Xin Lin and Yuchao Liu and Peiyu Du and Yuan Tan and Shangkun Lei and Chunli Li and Pei Chen},
  journal = {European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1007/s00405-026-10510-7},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10510-7},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Surgical strategies for external auditory canal cholesteatoma based on the He staging system: a retrospective study
AU  - Linli Yao
AU  - Xin Lin
AU  - Yuchao Liu
AU  - Peiyu Du
AU  - Yuan Tan
AU  - Shangkun Lei
AU  - Chunli Li
AU  - Pei Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/03
JO  - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
DO  - 10.1007/s00405-026-10510-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10510-7
AB  - Purpose: To investigate individualized surgical treatment strategies and clinical management experience for external auditory canal cholesteatoma (EACC) based on the He staging system.  Methods: Clinical data from 59 patients (61 ears) with EACC who underwent surgical treatment at Wuhan No. 1 Hospital from September 2019 to July 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent a preoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) examination and were staged according to the He staging system (Stage I, 8 ears; Stage II, 33 ears; Stage IIIA, 11 ears; Stage IIIB, 5 ears; and Stage IIIC, 4 ears). Individualized surgeries, including lesion resection via endoscopic ear surgery, canaloplasty, tympanoplasty, and mastoid surgery, were performed accordingly. Regular postoperative follow-up was conducted to evaluate therapeutic outcomes and complications.  Results: Postoperative pathological examinations confirmed cholesteatoma in all patients. During the follow-up period of 7 months to 2 years, recurrence occurred in 2 ears (3.28%, both of which were Stage II cases), which were cured after revision surgery. Postoperative complications included external auditory canal infection in 3 ears (4.92%) and restenosis in 2 ears (3.28%), all of which resolved after appropriate management. Additionally, 3 ears (4.92%) exhibited wide external auditory canal cavities postoperatively, with one accompanied by meatal stenosis. Among these patients, two improved after the application of topical medication and close follow-up, while one developed mild facial palsy (House–Brackmann grade II) triggered by acute external otitis and recovered well after revision canaloplasty, with a satisfactory cavity morphology.  Conclusion: The He staging system provides practical guidance for preoperative evaluations and the formulation of surgical strategies for patients with EACC. Stage-based individualized surgery effectively achieves lesion clearance and reduces recurrence rates. Intraoperative attention to the external auditory meatus and postoperative recognition of and intervention in the “sequelae stage” are crucial for ensuring favorable long-term outcomes.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10510-7.
SN  - 0937-4477
SN  - 1434-4726
ER  -