Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Beyond white- and black-box modeling tools in optical communications and optical computing: physics-informed data-driven modeling

Abstract

Efficient optimization and control of photonic computing and communication systems increasingly rely on accurate surrogate models/digital twins. While data-driven models may achieve faster inference than traditional physics-based methods, they typically suffer from poor training data efficiency and limited generalizability. To address this trade-off, physics-informed data-driven modeling has emerged as a powerful hybrid paradigm. This paper presents a comparative analysis of these three modeling paradigms across three test use cases: optical amplifiers, directly modulated lasers, and interferometer meshes. By evaluating model complexity, data efficiency, generalizability, and modularity, this work provides a detailed analysis of the respective trade-offs and highlights the advantages of combining physical insight with data-driven learning.

Related

  1. Mechanism-informed dynamic surrogate modeling for rapid thermal-aberration prediction in bonded optical systems
    Yuxi Zhao, Huanxiong Xia, Xiumin Zhang +1
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsOptics & photonicsCrossref
  2. Quantification of the habitual axial strains in the murine tibia using a musculoskeletal modeling informed Finite Element analysis approach
    Katharina Fabro, Maxence Lavaill, Natalia Castoldi +3
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
  3. Digital Twin Modeling of Quantum Dynamical Systems: Dissipative Quantum Reservoir Computing
    Abhijit Sen, Bikram Keshari Parida, Shital Chauhan +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Continuous vision transformer-based neural operator for scalable beam propagation modeling in optical fibers
    Xiao Luo, Yao Zhang, Yiming Meng +3
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsOptics & photonicsCrossref
  5. LES-derived turbulence tank optical propagation with numerical adaptive-optics modeling: quantifying OAM modal crosstalk and mitigation
    Yanling Li, Zhiwei Tao, Hanling Deng +4
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsOptics & photonicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{teofilovic2026beyond,
  title = {{Beyond white- and black-box modeling tools in optical communications and optical computing: physics-informed data-driven modeling}},
  author = {Isidora Teofilovic and Sergio Hernandez Fernandez and Metodi P. Yankov and Christophe Peucheret and Darko Zibar and Francesco Da Ros},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.07274},
  eprint = {2607.07274},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07274},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Beyond white- and black-box modeling tools in optical communications and optical computing: physics-informed data-driven modeling
AU  - Isidora Teofilovic
AU  - Sergio Hernandez Fernandez
AU  - Metodi P. Yankov
AU  - Christophe Peucheret
AU  - Darko Zibar
AU  - Francesco Da Ros
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.07274
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07274
AB  - Efficient optimization and control of photonic computing and communication systems increasingly rely on accurate surrogate models/digital twins. While data-driven models may achieve faster inference than traditional physics-based methods, they typically suffer from poor training data efficiency and limited generalizability. To address this trade-off, physics-informed data-driven modeling has emerged as a powerful hybrid paradigm. This paper presents a comparative analysis of these three modeling paradigms across three test use cases: optical amplifiers, directly modulated lasers, and interferometer meshes. By evaluating model complexity, data efficiency, generalizability, and modularity, this work provides a detailed analysis of the respective trade-offs and highlights the advantages of combining physical insight with data-driven learning.
ER  -