Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on implementing opt-out smoking cessation in perioperative and cancer care in the Netherlands: A qualitative interview study
- 1The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute Utrecht The Netherlands
Abstract
Introduction: Smokers face increased risks of complications and mortality after surgery or cancer treatment. Smoking cessation care is usually offered in an opt-in manner, meaning that patients must actively choose to receive support. Consequently, support may primarily reach patients who are already highly motivated to quit. Combined with healthcare professionals’ barriers, such as limited time or training, this may reduce delivery of cessation care. An opt-out approach, in which healthcare professionals routinely refer all patients who smoke to smoking cessation support as part of standard care unless they decline, may increase uptake of cessation support. This study explored healthcare professionals’ perspectives on implementing opt-out smoking cessation care during the perioperative and cancer treatment phases.
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in the Netherlands using semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals from different hospitals between March and April 2025. Eligible participants were healthcare professionals employed in a Dutch general, academic, or specialist oncology hospital and involved in perioperative or cancer care. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach combining deductive and inductive coding.
Results: Thirteen healthcare professionals from ten Dutch hospitals were interviewed. Two overarching themes were identified: 1) perceived effects of the opt-out approach on patient participation and the doctor–patient relationship; and 2) facilitators and barriers to implementation. Participants anticipated increased uptake of smoking cessation support by lowering participation barriers. Facilitators included standardized referral pathways and routine integration. Potential challenges included limited time, staff constraints, patient motivation, and autonomy concerns.
Conclusions: Healthcare professionals generally perceived the opt-out approach as an acceptable and potentially feasible strategy to improve access to smoking cessation support. Successful implementation is likely to require adequate organizational support and clear referral pathways. Further research is needed to identify optimal implementation strategies and evaluate impacts on referral rates, uptake of support, and patient outcomes.
Related
- A decade of implementing comprehensive child development services in Northwest Iran: a qualitative study of provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators
- Perspectives on implementing nerve and tendon transfer surgery in spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the USA and Canada: a qualitative study.
- Exploring Medical Professionals’ Perspectives on Cannabinoid Use in Professional and Elite-Level Contact Sports: A Qualitative Inquiry
- Accessibility of essential medicines and vaccines among fisherfolk, artisanal miners and pastoralists in Mainland Tanzania: a qualitative study of barriers and strategies from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and community leaders.
- Stakeholder perspectives on implementing geographic information systems for leprosy elimination in Pakistan: A qualitative study
BibTeX
@article{kramer2026healthcare,
title = {{Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on implementing opt-out smoking cessation in perioperative and cancer care in the Netherlands: A qualitative interview study}},
author = {Iris Kramer and Annephine H. Cahn and Naomi A. van Westen-Lagerweij and Sophie J.A. Jooren and Esther A. Croes},
journal = {Tobacco Prevention \& Cessation},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.18332/tpc/240141},
url = {https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/240141},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on implementing opt-out smoking cessation in perioperative and cancer care in the Netherlands: A qualitative interview study
AU - Iris Kramer
AU - Annephine H. Cahn
AU - Naomi A. van Westen-Lagerweij
AU - Sophie J.A. Jooren
AU - Esther A. Croes
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
JO - Tobacco Prevention & Cessation
DO - 10.18332/tpc/240141
UR - https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/240141
AB - Introduction: Smokers face increased risks of complications and mortality after surgery or cancer treatment. Smoking cessation care is usually offered in an opt-in manner, meaning that patients must actively choose to receive support. Consequently, support may primarily reach patients who are already highly motivated to quit. Combined with healthcare professionals’ barriers, such as limited time or training, this may reduce delivery of cessation care. An opt-out approach, in which healthcare professionals routinely refer all patients who smoke to smoking cessation support as part of standard care unless they decline, may increase uptake of cessation support. This study explored healthcare professionals’ perspectives on implementing opt-out smoking cessation care during the perioperative and cancer treatment phases. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in the Netherlands using semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals from different hospitals between March and April 2025. Eligible participants were healthcare professionals employed in a Dutch general, academic, or specialist oncology hospital and involved in perioperative or cancer care. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach combining deductive and inductive coding. Results: Thirteen healthcare professionals from ten Dutch hospitals were interviewed. Two overarching themes were identified: 1) perceived effects of the opt-out approach on patient participation and the doctor–patient relationship; and 2) facilitators and barriers to implementation. Participants anticipated increased uptake of smoking cessation support by lowering participation barriers. Facilitators included standardized referral pathways and routine integration. Potential challenges included limited time, staff constraints, patient motivation, and autonomy concerns. Conclusions: Healthcare professionals generally perceived the opt-out approach as an acceptable and potentially feasible strategy to improve access to smoking cessation support. Successful implementation is likely to require adequate organizational support and clear referral pathways. Further research is needed to identify optimal implementation strategies and evaluate impacts on referral rates, uptake of support, and patient outcomes.
SN - 2459-3087
ER -