Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Rectifiability of the straight visible boundary and the limits of segment-based Hardy criteria

Abstract

Weighted Hardy inequalities on a domain Ω⊂Rn can be deduced from lower Hausdorff-content bounds on suitable visible parts of the boundary, and it is natural to look for visible sets described by straight segments, which are easier to verify than the curve-based visual boundary of Koskela and Lehrbäck. We show that this approach is subject to an intrinsic obstruction. If a boundary point ξ is seen from x∈Ω along a segment satisfying a uniform thickness condition, then Ω contains a truncated cone with vertex ξ; consequently the quantitatively straight visible boundary ∂strx,αΩ∩ B(x,C0dΩ(x)) is a finite union of Lipschitz graphs, is (n−1)-rectifiable, and carries no λ-Hausdorff content for any λ>n−1. Since content conditions with λ≤ n−1 already imply the (p,β)-Hardy inequality for β<p−n+λ without any visibility assumption, segment-based criteria are either unsatisfiable or redundant: they never reach the regime β≥ p−1 in which visibility is genuinely needed. We show that the exponent n−1 is attained, so that the rectifiability theorem is sharp; we exhibit a boundary point lying in the visual boundary of Koskela and Lehrbäck but in no ∂strx,αΩ; and we observe that raw straight visibility, without the thickness condition, escapes the obstruction, is sufficient for λ≤ n−1, and remains open for λ>n−1.

Related

  1. Riemannian convex bodies with a geodesic segment on the boundary
    Hongda Qiu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  2. Inequivalent complexity criteria for free boundary minimal surfaces
    Alessandro Carlotto, Giada Franz
    Advances in MathematicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Survey on Favard length and rectifiability
    Damian Dąbrowski
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. The measure contraction property and rectifiability
    Sean Li
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. Whitney extension theorem and intrinsic rectifiability of jump sets in Carnot-Carathéodory spaces
    Marco Di Marco
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{abbas2026rectifiability,
  title = {{Rectifiability of the straight visible boundary and the limits of segment-based Hardy criteria}},
  author = {H. Abbas and A. Azzouz},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.22407},
  eprint = {2609.22407},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22407},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Rectifiability of the straight visible boundary and the limits of segment-based Hardy criteria
AU  - H. Abbas
AU  - A. Azzouz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/18
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.22407
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22407
AB  - Weighted Hardy inequalities on a domain Ω⊂R^n can be deduced from lower Hausdorff-content bounds on suitable visible parts of the boundary, and it is natural to look for visible sets described by straight segments, which are easier to verify than the curve-based visual boundary of Koskela and Lehrbäck. We show that this approach is subject to an intrinsic obstruction. If a boundary point ξ is seen from x∈Ω along a segment satisfying a uniform thickness condition, then Ω contains a truncated cone with vertex ξ; consequently the quantitatively straight visible boundary ∂^str_x,αΩ∩ B(x,C_0d_Ω(x)) is a finite union of Lipschitz graphs, is (n−1)-rectifiable, and carries no λ-Hausdorff content for any λ>n−1. Since content conditions with λ≤ n−1 already imply the (p,β)-Hardy inequality for β<p−n+λ without any visibility assumption, segment-based criteria are either unsatisfiable or redundant: they never reach the regime β≥ p−1 in which visibility is genuinely needed. We show that the exponent n−1 is attained, so that the rectifiability theorem is sharp; we exhibit a boundary point lying in the visual boundary of Koskela and Lehrbäck but in no ∂^str_x,αΩ; and we observe that raw straight visibility, without the thickness condition, escapes the obstruction, is sufficient for λ≤ n−1, and remains open for λ>n−1.
ER  -