Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

The alcohol prevention paradox in Ireland: implications for equitable population-level policy

Abstract

Introduction: Although alcohol-attributable mortality risk increases with consumption, harm may be distributed across the wider drinking population. Understanding this distribution is important for designing equitable, population-level prevention strategies. This study examined whether alcohol-attributable deaths in Ireland were concentrated among the highest-consuming drinkers.

Methods: Mean annual alcohol-attributable deaths among residents of Ireland aged ≥15 years during 2022-2024 were estimated using comparative risk assessment. Consumption was estimated from the nationally representative Healthy Ireland Survey 2024 and calibrated to recorded per-capita sales. Mortality data were obtained from the General Mortality Register and relative risks from systematically identified meta-analyses. Drinkers were ranked by calibrated average daily consumption, separately by sex. Deaths and deaths per 100,000 drinkers were estimated for the highest-consuming 10% and remaining 90%.

Results: An estimated 1,420 deaths were alcohol-attributable annually, representing 4.0% of all deaths; 1,096 occurred among men and 324 among women. The highest-consuming 10% had calibrated consumption of at least 72.5 g/day among men and at least 32.5 g/day among women. Among men, the highest-consuming 10% accounted for 448 deaths (41%), while 649 (59%) deaths occurred in the remaining population. Corresponding estimates among women were 149 (46%) and 175 (54%). Mortality rates per 100,000 drinkers were higher in the highest-consuming 10% than in the remaining men (259.4 versus 33.8) and women (83.8 versus 8.7).

Conclusions: Although alcohol-attributable mortality rates were highest among the heaviest 10% of drinkers, more than half of alcohol-attributable deaths occurred in the remaining population. This is consistent with the prevention paradox. Effective and equitable alcohol prevention is therefore likely to require population-level measures alongside targeted support for those at highest risk.

Key messages: • Most alcohol-attributable deaths occurred outside the highest-consuming 10%, supporting population-level prevention alongside targeted support.

• Findings support equitable alcohol policies that reduce harm across the full drinking population, not only among the heaviest drinkers.

Related

  1. Acting on the calcium we already see: Opportunistic coronary artery calcium as a complement to equitable prevention.
    Lina Yimeng Du, Fatima Rodriguez, Kausik K Ray +2
    American journal of preventive cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  2. Equitable spam detection and prevention in a community-engaged public health survey
    Sarah Farash, Holly Sienkiewicz, Marc Solomon +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefPMC
  3. Organisational models for equitable STI prevention: a national mapping study
    M Crudele, A Colucci, V Mazzotta +7
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textInfectious diseasePMCEurope PMC
  4. Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial
    Jérémy Guenezan, Nicolas Marjanovic, Bertrand Drugeon +11
    The Lancet Infectious DiseasesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text64 citedGeneral biologyInfectious diseaseHAL
  5. The Lipid Paradox in Chronic Liver Disease: Integrative Evidence From Intrahepatic Transcriptomics and Population-based Cohorts
    Shuqiong Su, Zhimin Chen, Yingtong Ye +3
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental HepatologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{mcdowell2026alcohol,
  title = {{The alcohol prevention paradox in Ireland: implications for equitable population-level policy}},
  author = {CP McDowell and M Boudou and M O’Neill and L Comber and M Ryan},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1853},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1853},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The alcohol prevention paradox in Ireland: implications for equitable population-level policy
AU  - CP McDowell
AU  - M Boudou
AU  - M O’Neill
AU  - L Comber
AU  - M Ryan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1853
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1853
AB  - Introduction: Although alcohol-attributable mortality risk increases with consumption, harm may be distributed across the wider drinking population. Understanding this distribution is important for designing equitable, population-level prevention strategies. This study examined whether alcohol-attributable deaths in Ireland were concentrated among the highest-consuming drinkers.  Methods: Mean annual alcohol-attributable deaths among residents of Ireland aged ≥15 years during 2022-2024 were estimated using comparative risk assessment. Consumption was estimated from the nationally representative Healthy Ireland Survey 2024 and calibrated to recorded per-capita sales. Mortality data were obtained from the General Mortality Register and relative risks from systematically identified meta-analyses. Drinkers were ranked by calibrated average daily consumption, separately by sex. Deaths and deaths per 100,000 drinkers were estimated for the highest-consuming 10% and remaining 90%.  Results: An estimated 1,420 deaths were alcohol-attributable annually, representing 4.0% of all deaths; 1,096 occurred among men and 324 among women. The highest-consuming 10% had calibrated consumption of at least 72.5 g/day among men and at least 32.5 g/day among women. Among men, the highest-consuming 10% accounted for 448 deaths (41%), while 649 (59%) deaths occurred in the remaining population. Corresponding estimates among women were 149 (46%) and 175 (54%). Mortality rates per 100,000 drinkers were higher in the highest-consuming 10% than in the remaining men (259.4 versus 33.8) and women (83.8 versus 8.7).  Conclusions: Although alcohol-attributable mortality rates were highest among the heaviest 10% of drinkers, more than half of alcohol-attributable deaths occurred in the remaining population. This is consistent with the prevention paradox. Effective and equitable alcohol prevention is therefore likely to require population-level measures alongside targeted support for those at highest risk.  Key messages: • Most alcohol-attributable deaths occurred outside the highest-consuming 10%, supporting population-level prevention alongside targeted support.  • Findings support equitable alcohol policies that reduce harm across the full drinking population, not only among the heaviest drinkers.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -