Prospective Acceptability and Usability of a WhatsApp Chatbot for Epidemic Response in Malawi: Convergent Mixed Methods Study
Abstract
Background: Digital health tools were widely adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic and helped to strengthen surveillance, risk communication, and health education. The government of Malawi launched the Malawi COVID-19 WhatsApp Chatbot on May 29, 2020. It remains unclear whether tools like this are acceptable and usable enough to warrant deployment in future epidemic responses.
Objective: We assessed the prospective acceptability and usability of the Malawi COVID-19 WhatsApp Chatbot for future epidemic or pandemic preparedness and response.
Methods: We used a convergent mixed methods design at a national workshop held from September 9 to 10, 2024, in Dowa District, Malawi. Thirty-nine participants (18 health workers and 21 members of the public) were purposively sampled from 10 districts. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using the technology acceptance model (TAM) and Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) tools. Qualitative data from facilitated group discussions were analyzed with thematic analysis, using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach. We compared TAM scores (nonnormally distributed; Wilcoxon rank-sum test) and MARS scores (approximately normally distributed; independent-samples 1-tailed t test) between health workers and the public. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated at the interpretation stage.
Results: Thirty-nine participants completed the TAM survey, and 37 completed the MARS survey. The mean overall TAM score was 4.33 (SD 0.82) out of 5, and the mean overall MARS score was 3.84 (SD 0.74) out of 5, both above each tool’s acceptability threshold of 3. Health workers scored the chatbot significantly higher than the public in the TAM (median difference 1.50, 95% CI 1.00‐2.00; P<.001) and MARS surveys (mean 4.03, SD 0.38 vs mean 3.71, SD 0.53; P=.04); no individual MARS subdomain showed a significant between-group difference. Among the participants, 80% said that they would use the chatbot again. Four themes emerged: accessibility and availability; awareness and acceptance; usage; and areas for improvement. Integration of the 2 strands suggested that the quantitative acceptance gap between groups was driven substantially by unequal prior awareness and exposure.
Conclusions: Among this purposively selected group, the chatbot was viewed as prospectively acceptable and usable for future epidemic response. These findings indicate prospective support among engaged stakeholders and suggest that future investment should prioritize multilingual design and broader public awareness of digital tools.
Related
- Usability and Acceptability of a Mobile Food Record in Free-Living Athletes: A Single-Group Observational Study
- Feasibility, acceptability and usability of InControl web-platform intervention for older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A mixed-methods pilot study protocol
- 'We need this now': Acceptability and usability of a pediatric antiretroviral microarray patch prototype in South Africa and Uganda
- Acceptability and usability of home-based HIV and blood glucose self-testing and home-based blood pressure measurement in Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia
- Usability, acceptability and feasibility of continuous glucose monitoring among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Kenya
BibTeX
@article{ngwira2026prospective,
title = {{Prospective Acceptability and Usability of a WhatsApp Chatbot for Epidemic Response in Malawi: Convergent Mixed Methods Study}},
author = {Selemani Ngwira and Tsung-Shu Joseph Wu and Isaach Ndemera and Alanna Denny and Hsin-yi Lee and Griphin Baxter Chirambo and Ben Chilima and Matthew Kagoli and Yu Ting Sunny Hsieh and Balwani Mbakaya and Joseph Kwong Leung Yu and John O'Donoghue},
journal = {JMIR Formative Research},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2196/83397},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2196/83397},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Prospective Acceptability and Usability of a WhatsApp Chatbot for Epidemic Response in Malawi: Convergent Mixed Methods Study
AU - Selemani Ngwira
AU - Tsung-Shu Joseph Wu
AU - Isaach Ndemera
AU - Alanna Denny
AU - Hsin-yi Lee
AU - Griphin Baxter Chirambo
AU - Ben Chilima
AU - Matthew Kagoli
AU - Yu Ting Sunny Hsieh
AU - Balwani Mbakaya
AU - Joseph Kwong Leung Yu
AU - John O'Donoghue
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - JMIR Formative Research
DO - 10.2196/83397
UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/83397
AB - Background: Digital health tools were widely adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic and helped to strengthen surveillance, risk communication, and health education. The government of Malawi launched the Malawi COVID-19 WhatsApp Chatbot on May 29, 2020. It remains unclear whether tools like this are acceptable and usable enough to warrant deployment in future epidemic responses. Objective: We assessed the prospective acceptability and usability of the Malawi COVID-19 WhatsApp Chatbot for future epidemic or pandemic preparedness and response. Methods: We used a convergent mixed methods design at a national workshop held from September 9 to 10, 2024, in Dowa District, Malawi. Thirty-nine participants (18 health workers and 21 members of the public) were purposively sampled from 10 districts. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using the technology acceptance model (TAM) and Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) tools. Qualitative data from facilitated group discussions were analyzed with thematic analysis, using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach. We compared TAM scores (nonnormally distributed; Wilcoxon rank-sum test) and MARS scores (approximately normally distributed; independent-samples 1-tailed t test) between health workers and the public. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated at the interpretation stage. Results: Thirty-nine participants completed the TAM survey, and 37 completed the MARS survey. The mean overall TAM score was 4.33 (SD 0.82) out of 5, and the mean overall MARS score was 3.84 (SD 0.74) out of 5, both above each tool’s acceptability threshold of 3. Health workers scored the chatbot significantly higher than the public in the TAM (median difference 1.50, 95% CI 1.00‐2.00; P<.001) and MARS surveys (mean 4.03, SD 0.38 vs mean 3.71, SD 0.53; P=.04); no individual MARS subdomain showed a significant between-group difference. Among the participants, 80% said that they would use the chatbot again. Four themes emerged: accessibility and availability; awareness and acceptance; usage; and areas for improvement. Integration of the 2 strands suggested that the quantitative acceptance gap between groups was driven substantially by unequal prior awareness and exposure. Conclusions: Among this purposively selected group, the chatbot was viewed as prospectively acceptable and usable for future epidemic response. These findings indicate prospective support among engaged stakeholders and suggest that future investment should prioritize multilingual design and broader public awareness of digital tools.
SN - 2561-326X
ER -