Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Bayesian deep learning integration of geophysical and drilling data for 3D prediction of copper mineralization and drill targeting: a case study from the Kogodai prospect, Rudny Altai

Abstract

Exploration drill targeting in structurally complex terranes is hindered by sparse sampling, heterogeneous datasets, and the ambiguity of geophysical inversions. Here, we present an uncertainty-aware 3D workflow for the acceleration of time-to-discovery in brownfield explorations and apply it to the Kogodai prospect in the Rudny Altai metallogenic province. We jointly analyse existing drilling and geophysical data in a comprehensive approach, revealing hidden patterns in already available data. Drillholes and trenches were desurveyed to a common 3D reference frame, and assays were composited to a consistent spatial support to facilitate joint modelling with geophysical inputs. We develop Bayesian deep-learning models to predict 3D fields of Cu grade together with chargeability and apparent resistivity while quantifying epistemic uncertainty via Monte Carlo sampling. The original contribution of this work is to treat the problem not as pointwise regression between co-located observations, but as joint learning of spatially continuous 3D fields from sparse, heterogeneous exploration evidence. The resulting 3D predictions delineate a principal mineralized trend and several localized candidate zones that coincide with elevated induced polarization (IP) responses, while uncertainty mapping highlights where predictions are robust versus where additional drilling would be most informative. The continuous Cu-grade field can also be thresholded to produce binary prospectivity maps, allowing the sensitivity of target delineation to the chosen cutoff to be evaluated. The outputs are intended for qualitative interpretation and risk-aware drill targeting rather than resource estimation, and we discuss key limitations arising from incomplete provenance metadata for geophysical products and heterogeneity of historical sampling.

Related

  1. Bayesian Geophysical Inversion using Stein Mixture Variational Inference for Multimodal or Complex Solutions
    Xuebin Zhao, Andrew Curtis
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyarXiv
  2. Reconciliation Through Integration: A Source-Level Bayesian Framework for Developing Measurement-Integrated Methane Inventories
    Abdulahi Raji, Caitlin Barndt, Joshua Blaine +2
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textClimate scienceChemRxiv
  3. Input-data perturbation in groundwater level prediction: a controlled experiment on accuracy–reliability trade-offs among data augmentation and Bayesian-type uncertainty estimation methods
    Naser Shiri, Razi Sheikholeslami, Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  4. Time Series Fuzzy Bayesian Logistic Regression for Wildfire Event Prediction
    Georgios Charizanos, Haydar Demirhan, Duygu Icen
    Earth and Space SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
  5. Enhancing Tropical Cyclone Prediction Through AI Weather Model Ensemble Forecasts and Multi‐Source Data Integration
    Shijin Yuan, Guansong Wang, Bin Mu +3
    Earth and Space SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossrefDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{veshchezerova2026bayesian,
  title = {{Bayesian deep learning integration of geophysical and drilling data for 3D prediction of copper mineralization and drill targeting: a case study from the Kogodai prospect, Rudny Altai}},
  author = {Margarita Veshchezerova and Egor Barashov and Evgenii Gusev and Michael R. Perelshtein and Arlan Kasymzhan and Bolat M. Kabaziev and Nurlan Y. Askarov},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.09246},
  eprint = {2609.09246},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09246},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Bayesian deep learning integration of geophysical and drilling data for 3D prediction of copper mineralization and drill targeting: a case study from the Kogodai prospect, Rudny Altai
AU  - Margarita Veshchezerova
AU  - Egor Barashov
AU  - Evgenii Gusev
AU  - Michael R. Perelshtein
AU  - Arlan Kasymzhan
AU  - Bolat M. Kabaziev
AU  - Nurlan Y. Askarov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.09246
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09246
AB  - Exploration drill targeting in structurally complex terranes is hindered by sparse sampling, heterogeneous datasets, and the ambiguity of geophysical inversions. Here, we present an uncertainty-aware 3D workflow for the acceleration of time-to-discovery in brownfield explorations and apply it to the Kogodai prospect in the Rudny Altai metallogenic province. We jointly analyse existing drilling and geophysical data in a comprehensive approach, revealing hidden patterns in already available data. Drillholes and trenches were desurveyed to a common 3D reference frame, and assays were composited to a consistent spatial support to facilitate joint modelling with geophysical inputs. We develop Bayesian deep-learning models to predict 3D fields of Cu grade together with chargeability and apparent resistivity while quantifying epistemic uncertainty via Monte Carlo sampling. The original contribution of this work is to treat the problem not as pointwise regression between co-located observations, but as joint learning of spatially continuous 3D fields from sparse, heterogeneous exploration evidence. The resulting 3D predictions delineate a principal mineralized trend and several localized candidate zones that coincide with elevated induced polarization (IP) responses, while uncertainty mapping highlights where predictions are robust versus where additional drilling would be most informative. The continuous Cu-grade field can also be thresholded to produce binary prospectivity maps, allowing the sensitivity of target delineation to the chosen cutoff to be evaluated. The outputs are intended for qualitative interpretation and risk-aware drill targeting rather than resource estimation, and we discuss key limitations arising from incomplete provenance metadata for geophysical products and heterogeneity of historical sampling.
ER  -