Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAJournal of global infectious diseases

Need-based Compared to Guidelines-based Fluid Administration in Dengue Patients with Warning Signs: An Open-label Randomized Study.

  1. 1Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  2. 2Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Abstract

Introduction

Fluid therapy is fundamental in dengue management. We evaluated an individualized, hemodynamic parameter-guided fluid strategy compared with standard World Health Organization (WHO) guideline-based care in dengue patients with warning signs.Methods

In this open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi (December 2019-October 2023), 80 adult dengue patients with warning signs were randomized (1:1) to receive either WHO guideline-based fluid therapy (control) or need-based therapy guided by noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) (intervention). The primary outcome was hemodynamic stability assessed by systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse pressure (PP), and mean arterial pressure over 48 h. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, progression to severe dengue, and mortality.Results

Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. The intervention arm demonstrated higher mean PP at 8 h (45.2 ± 11.6 mmHg vs. 39.8 ± 8.7 mmHg), 12 h (45 ± 11.3 mmHg vs. 38.9 ± 8.1 mmHg), and 24 h (44.1 ± 9.6 mmHg vs. 39.1 ± 6.6 mmHg) (P < 0.05). SBP was higher at 8 h (P = 0.02). However, progression to severe dengue (17.5% in both groups), hospital stay (5.4 vs. 5.5 days; P = 0.87), and mortality (none) were similar.Conclusion

Although NICOM/POCUS-guided fluid therapy improved selected hemodynamic parameters, it did not translate into measurable improvements in clinical outcomes compared with WHO guideline-based care. Larger, multicenter studies powered for clinical endpoints in high-risk subgroups are warranted.

Related

  1. Efficacy and safety of FXI antibody cenvacibart compared with aspirin for venous thromboprophylaxis in patients after total knee arthroplasty (ROXI-ASPEN): study protocol for a phase 3, double-blinded, randomized trial
    Aaron P. Kithcart, Margaret Onisko, Wanxue Zou +6
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  2. PC6 injection enhanced the preventive effect against postoperative nausea of granisetron compared with intravenous injection in gynecological laparoscopic patients: a randomized controlled study
    Jianying Song, Jia Tang, Juan Gu +2
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Timing of Insulin Glargine Administration During Intermittent Ramadan Fasting in patients With Type1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (GLARIF).
    Reem Alamoudi, Ali Alqarni, Maram Alsubaiee +7
    Journal of diabetes science and technologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  4. Effects of multiple low-dose intranasal dexmedetomidine administration on postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer: a single-center randomized controlled trial
    Bing Li, Yao Liu, Xinmin Liu +5
    Frontiers in pharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCCrossref
  5. RESULT-Hip. The impact of restrictive compared with liberal transfusion strategy on cardiac injury and death in patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture : protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial of two blood transfusion strategies.
    RESULT Hip Study Group, Rhona C F Sinclair, Gayle Beveridge +23
    Bone & joint openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{soneja2026needbased,
  title = {{Need-based Compared to Guidelines-based Fluid Administration in Dengue Patients with Warning Signs: An Open-label Randomized Study.}},
  author = {Manish Soneja and Paras Singla and Chaitanya and Ayush Agarwal and Adil Rashid Khan and Neeraj Nischal and Upendra Baitha and Pankaj Jorwal and Animesh Ray and Ashutosh Biswas and Naveet Wig},
  journal = {Journal of global infectious diseases},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.4103/jgid.jgid_202_25},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42899050},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Need-based Compared to Guidelines-based Fluid Administration in Dengue Patients with Warning Signs: An Open-label Randomized Study.
AU  - Manish Soneja
AU  - Paras Singla
AU  - Chaitanya
AU  - Ayush Agarwal
AU  - Adil Rashid Khan
AU  - Neeraj Nischal
AU  - Upendra Baitha
AU  - Pankaj Jorwal
AU  - Animesh Ray
AU  - Ashutosh Biswas
AU  - Naveet Wig
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Journal of global infectious diseases
DO  - 10.4103/jgid.jgid_202_25
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42899050
AB  - Introduction  Fluid therapy is fundamental in dengue management. We evaluated an individualized, hemodynamic parameter-guided fluid strategy compared with standard World Health Organization (WHO) guideline-based care in dengue patients with warning signs.Methods  In this open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi (December 2019-October 2023), 80 adult dengue patients with warning signs were randomized (1:1) to receive either WHO guideline-based fluid therapy (control) or need-based therapy guided by noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) (intervention). The primary outcome was hemodynamic stability assessed by systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse pressure (PP), and mean arterial pressure over 48 h. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, progression to severe dengue, and mortality.Results  Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. The intervention arm demonstrated higher mean PP at 8 h (45.2 ± 11.6 mmHg vs. 39.8 ± 8.7 mmHg), 12 h (45 ± 11.3 mmHg vs. 38.9 ± 8.1 mmHg), and 24 h (44.1 ± 9.6 mmHg vs. 39.1 ± 6.6 mmHg) (P < 0.05). SBP was higher at 8 h (P = 0.02). However, progression to severe dengue (17.5% in both groups), hospital stay (5.4 vs. 5.5 days; P = 0.87), and mortality (none) were similar.Conclusion  Although NICOM/POCUS-guided fluid therapy improved selected hemodynamic parameters, it did not translate into measurable improvements in clinical outcomes compared with WHO guideline-based care. Larger, multicenter studies powered for clinical endpoints in high-risk subgroups are warranted.
SN  - 0974-777X
SN  - 0974-8245
ER  -