Neural competition and probabilistic representations
- 1ICREA and Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Abstract
Perception and action show tight links to the statistical structure of physical stimuli and likely rewards, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. A simple, biologically plausible network model shows that probabilistic behavior emerges naturally in diverse scenarios, and arises from sampling of competing responses. Notably, it also provides a principled computational rationale for the prevalent finding of balanced excitation and inhibition in the brain. Recurrent connections within a population of excitatory neurons embed multiple attractor states, and coupling to a pool of inhibitory neurons enforces mutual exclusivity among the states. Upon concurrent stimulation, competing attractors alternate in activity. These global state transitions are caused by local, uncorrelated spiking noise and yet convey, over time, the relative strengths of attractors support. The simplest probabilistic competitive recurrent networks (PCRNs) allow for closed-form analysis, shedding light on the neural basis of choice behavior under uncertainty. More complex systems of laterally connected PCRNs can collectively resolve the myriad local ambiguities pervasive in sensory stimuli, rapidly settling into globally-consistent configurations that match perceptual reports. Alternations are crucial in all cases, and occur only if a PCRNs inhibitory pool is strong enough to prevent attractors activity from reaching saturation. A balance between excitation and inhibition is thus both a prerequisite and a hallmark of probabilistic sampling in cortical networks.
Related
- Frustration reduces interpersonal competition through dynamic interpersonal neural synchronization in dyads
- Space versus Context: Competition for limited neural resources determines engram cell allocation in the hippocampus
- Shifts in neural representations, not gaze, track how people reinterpret ambiguous social scenes
- Intracranial electrophysiology reveals distinct neural representations of nociception and salience in the human brain
- Shared neural geometries for bilingual semantic representations in human hippocampal neurons
BibTeX
@misc{lobo2026neural,
title = {{Neural competition and probabilistic representations}},
author = {J. Lobo and N. Rubin},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.31.748371},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.748371v1},
note = {CC BY-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Neural competition and probabilistic representations
AU - J. Lobo
AU - N. Rubin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/31
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.31.748371
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.748371v1
AB - Perception and action show tight links to the statistical structure of physical stimuli and likely rewards, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. A simple, biologically plausible network model shows that probabilistic behavior emerges naturally in diverse scenarios, and arises from sampling of competing responses. Notably, it also provides a principled computational rationale for the prevalent finding of balanced excitation and inhibition in the brain. Recurrent connections within a population of excitatory neurons embed multiple attractor states, and coupling to a pool of inhibitory neurons enforces mutual exclusivity among the states. Upon concurrent stimulation, competing attractors alternate in activity. These global state transitions are caused by local, uncorrelated spiking noise and yet convey, over time, the relative strengths of attractors support. The simplest probabilistic competitive recurrent networks (PCRNs) allow for closed-form analysis, shedding light on the neural basis of choice behavior under uncertainty. More complex systems of laterally connected PCRNs can collectively resolve the myriad local ambiguities pervasive in sensory stimuli, rapidly settling into globally-consistent configurations that match perceptual reports. Alternations are crucial in all cases, and occur only if a PCRNs inhibitory pool is strong enough to prevent attractors activity from reaching saturation. A balance between excitation and inhibition is thus both a prerequisite and a hallmark of probabilistic sampling in cortical networks.
ER -