JWST Excludes Exomoons Down to 0.1 Earth Radii Around a Rocky, Temperate Exoplanet
Abstract
To date, even with JWST, it has not been possible to test for exomoons as small as the Moon. Only two reported searches for exomoons around bound planets have been attempted with JWST, both of which relied on a single JWST transit. We suggest that the below expectation sensitivity to date is, in part, a product of the considerable intrinsic flexibility of the planet+moon transit model when confronted with a single event, and the presence of unanticipated systematic noise. To test this, we present a search around the rocky, temperate-zone exoplanet LP 890-9c using twelve JWST transits. We find no evidence for an exomoon but exclude 0.1R⊕ moons to 95% confidence across the entire Hill region, representing by far the most sensitive search to date. Our limits exclude analogs to many real Solar System moons, such as Europa, Rhea and Umbriel. However, we emphasize that the close-in orbit of LP 890-9c (0.04au) would make any moons larger than ∼0.1R⊕ unlikely to survive for many Gyr due to tides. Regardless, our study firmly establishes that JWST can indeed probe down to remarkably small moons. Further, we find that even a single transit can deliver impressive limits, with the exception of one epoch that is contaminated by red noise. However, by pairing it with just one cleaner epoch, the sensitivity recovers to a level indistinguishable from any other pairing, which bodes well for a potential second JWST transit of Kepler-167e.
Related
- A Formation-Stage Bottleneck for Exomoons around Close-in Rocky Planets
- A Formation-stage Bottleneck for Exomoons around Close-in Rocky Planets
- Exomoonlight Sonata: On the Fate of Exomoons Around Migrating White Dwarf Planets
- Astrometric planet search around southern ultracool dwarfs. V. Discovery of the exoplanet candidate PALTA-1 b
- Molecular mapping of an exoplanet with JWST: NH3 detection in the temperate super-Jupiter Epsilon Indi Ab
BibTeX
@misc{kipping2026jwst,
title = {{JWST Excludes Exomoons Down to 0.1 Earth Radii Around a Rocky, Temperate Exoplanet}},
author = {David Kipping},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.05301},
eprint = {2609.05301},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05301},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - JWST Excludes Exomoons Down to 0.1 Earth Radii Around a Rocky, Temperate Exoplanet
AU - David Kipping
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/04
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.05301
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05301
AB - To date, even with JWST, it has not been possible to test for exomoons as small as the Moon. Only two reported searches for exomoons around bound planets have been attempted with JWST, both of which relied on a single JWST transit. We suggest that the below expectation sensitivity to date is, in part, a product of the considerable intrinsic flexibility of the planet+moon transit model when confronted with a single event, and the presence of unanticipated systematic noise. To test this, we present a search around the rocky, temperate-zone exoplanet LP 890-9c using twelve JWST transits. We find no evidence for an exomoon but exclude 0.1R_⊕ moons to 95% confidence across the entire Hill region, representing by far the most sensitive search to date. Our limits exclude analogs to many real Solar System moons, such as Europa, Rhea and Umbriel. However, we emphasize that the close-in orbit of LP 890-9c (0.04au) would make any moons larger than ∼0.1R_⊕ unlikely to survive for many Gyr due to tides. Regardless, our study firmly establishes that JWST can indeed probe down to remarkably small moons. Further, we find that even a single transit can deliver impressive limits, with the exception of one epoch that is contaminated by red noise. However, by pairing it with just one cleaner epoch, the sensitivity recovers to a level indistinguishable from any other pairing, which bodes well for a potential second JWST transit of Kepler-167e.
ER -