Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Joint Trust-Distrust Structure Shapes Belief Propagation and Collective Dynamics

Abstract

Belief propagation in social networks depends on how trust and distrust jointly shape interpersonal influence. We develop a network model that treats trust and distrust as distinct but statistically coupled quantities. Their joint values determine the net trust and uncertainty of each relationship, and a neighbor can influence an agent only when both threshold conditions are satisfied. We show that the correlation between trust and distrust reshapes the transition between consensus and fragmentation by changing the availability of influential neighbors. Network connectivity also affects this transition, whereas degree heterogeneity has a more limited effect when networks have comparable mean degree. Moreover, the availability of influential neighbors alone does not determine the final consensus: correlations between relational properties and network degree can select agents with different degree compositions, altering the direction and magnitude of collective belief. Finally, we introduce a comfort index that quantifies the expected availability of influential neighbors and analytically links the joint trust-distrust structure to collective dynamics. Our results establish a mechanistic connection between relational structure, effective social influence, and emergent collective belief states.

Related

  1. The life and death of football team runs: survival of collective modes shapes Lévy-like transport
    Guillermo Herrera Sánchez, Daniel Gradeci, Daniele Ramsay +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Microscopic description of the fission process including intrinsic excitations. Part III: 240Pu fission dynamics along 1D asymmetric paths within the Schrodinger Collective Intrinsic Model
    P Carpentier, N Pillet, R Bernard +5
    HALPreprintLicence not statedNuclear physicsHAL
  3. Collective Excitonic Structure Governs Anomalously Weak Thermal Optical Dephasing in Conjugated Polymers
    Henry J. Kantrow, Elizabeth Gutiérrez-Meza, Eric R. Bittner +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Low-energy collective structure of 92,94Zr and 94Mo from (e,e′) and (p,p′) scattering I. Experimental results
    C. Walz, O. Burda, L. M. Donaldson +10
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNuclear physicsarXiv
  5. High-intensity wave vortices in the beamoptics domain: 3D spatial structure, singleplane models, and their propagation properties
    I. Mokhun, O. Angelsky, A. Bekshaev +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptics & photonicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{khanjanianpak2026joint,
  title = {{Joint Trust-Distrust Structure Shapes Belief Propagation and Collective Dynamics}},
  author = {Mozhgan Khanjanianpak and Yu-Ru Lin},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.14565},
  eprint = {2610.14565},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14565},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Joint Trust-Distrust Structure Shapes Belief Propagation and Collective Dynamics
AU  - Mozhgan Khanjanianpak
AU  - Yu-Ru Lin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.14565
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14565
AB  - Belief propagation in social networks depends on how trust and distrust jointly shape interpersonal influence. We develop a network model that treats trust and distrust as distinct but statistically coupled quantities. Their joint values determine the net trust and uncertainty of each relationship, and a neighbor can influence an agent only when both threshold conditions are satisfied. We show that the correlation between trust and distrust reshapes the transition between consensus and fragmentation by changing the availability of influential neighbors. Network connectivity also affects this transition, whereas degree heterogeneity has a more limited effect when networks have comparable mean degree. Moreover, the availability of influential neighbors alone does not determine the final consensus: correlations between relational properties and network degree can select agents with different degree compositions, altering the direction and magnitude of collective belief. Finally, we introduce a comfort index that quantifies the expected availability of influential neighbors and analytically links the joint trust-distrust structure to collective dynamics. Our results establish a mechanistic connection between relational structure, effective social influence, and emergent collective belief states.
ER  -