Navigating through the high species diversity of wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) requires more than identification keys
Abstract
In the context of pollinator decline and species-focused conservation measures, the need for data on wild bees continues to grow, and identifying them at a species level has become a crucial issue. This challenge is linked to a lack of naturalist skills, to the difficulty of the group, but also to a lack of tools to train people in this expertise, such as accessible, comprehensive, and up-to-date identification keys. Online multi-access keys are designed to facilitate identification, better illustrate criteria, and enable more fluid updates. These keys require a higher initial investment than dichotomous keys, but they should enable correct identification if they contain at least the information found in the corresponding traditional keys. In this study, we tested whether multi-access keys could help identify wild bees in France. We created three multi-access keys for the three most diverse genera of bees and tested them against dichotomous keys. These tests were carried out by 101 participants each having 15 min per specimen. The resulting 1320 identifications show that the multi-access format returns significantly less correct identifications from the 10 specialists (−19.4%), for longer identification time (+ 156 s). There were no significant differences between the keys for the less-experienced participants. Our results also highlight a high misidentification rate, 23–80% for specialists and 74–100% for beginners, stressing that species identification of wild bees in 15 min using only an identification key is ill-advised. This study suggests that morphological identification keys alone are not enough for fast and accurate species identifications of wild bees.
Related
- Pantoea ananatis- triggered systemic resistance requires root sensing through the LORE receptor kinase in Arabidopsis
- Parasite hideouts: Preserving native cavity-nesting Hymenoptera through pollinator hotel management
- Molecular identification and diversity assessment of Tyrrhenian Romulea species (Iridaceae)
- Orchid Diversity and Conservation through Agro-Ecotourism in Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya
- 793 PD1 expression in LAG3+ exhausted T cells restrains memory recall responses through a mechanism involving TCR repertoire diversity and non CD8+ T cell populations
BibTeX
@article{chabot2026navigating,
title = {{Navigating through the high species diversity of wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) requires more than identification keys}},
author = {Noé Barbier Chabot and Vincent Carlier and Adrien Perrard},
journal = {Apidologie},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1007/s13592-026-01299-9},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05748391v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Navigating through the high species diversity of wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) requires more than identification keys
AU - Noé Barbier Chabot
AU - Vincent Carlier
AU - Adrien Perrard
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/14
JO - Apidologie
DO - 10.1007/s13592-026-01299-9
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05748391v1
AB - In the context of pollinator decline and species-focused conservation measures, the need for data on wild bees continues to grow, and identifying them at a species level has become a crucial issue. This challenge is linked to a lack of naturalist skills, to the difficulty of the group, but also to a lack of tools to train people in this expertise, such as accessible, comprehensive, and up-to-date identification keys. Online multi-access keys are designed to facilitate identification, better illustrate criteria, and enable more fluid updates. These keys require a higher initial investment than dichotomous keys, but they should enable correct identification if they contain at least the information found in the corresponding traditional keys. In this study, we tested whether multi-access keys could help identify wild bees in France. We created three multi-access keys for the three most diverse genera of bees and tested them against dichotomous keys. These tests were carried out by 101 participants each having 15 min per specimen. The resulting 1320 identifications show that the multi-access format returns significantly less correct identifications from the 10 specialists (−19.4%), for longer identification time (+ 156 s). There were no significant differences between the keys for the less-experienced participants. Our results also highlight a high misidentification rate, 23–80% for specialists and 74–100% for beginners, stressing that species identification of wild bees in 15 min using only an identification key is ill-advised. This study suggests that morphological identification keys alone are not enough for fast and accurate species identifications of wild bees.
SN - 0044-8435
SN - 1297-9678
ER -