Implementation barriers in Singapore’s community-based falls prevention programmes: a root cause analysis
4 affiliations
- 1Centre for Ageing Research & Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 2Programme in Health Services Research & Population Health (HSRPH), Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 3Department of Medicine (General Internal Medicine), Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- 4Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
Abstract
Introduction: Falls are a critical public health challenge for ageing populations. Despite robust evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of multi-component falls prevention programmes (FPPs), a pronounced implementation gap exists in community settings. This study investigates systemic barriers to delivering FPPs in Singapore, focusing on resource constraints, operational capacities, and scaling risks.
Methods: This qualitative study employed a structured Facilitated Process Improvement workshop grounded in the Theory of Constraints. Fourteen management representatives from seven diverse Integrated Community Care Providers participated in the half-day workshop. The workshop featured three core activities: (i) capacity mapping of current and projected FPPs delivery capabilities, identification of (ii) challenges in falls risk screening processes and (iii) barriers in programme monitoring and evaluation. Workshop discussions were moderated through probing and clarifying using Categories of Legitimate Reservation, a logical framework to ensure all identified challenges were clearly defined and the causal linkages proposed were logically sound. Workshop insights were systematically analysed through the construction of a Current Reality Tree to map fundamental constraints.
Results: The core undesirable effect was the continued prevalence of avoidable injurious falls. Root causes identified included: (1) no systematic effort to inform older adults about falls and falls prevention, (2) community provider lack of training resources, (3) community provider insufficient funding, (4) a lack of both formal and informal data on demand for FPPs, and (5) high manpower cost for vendors to conduct FPPs. Findings from the CRT analysis are organised into three themes: (a) older adult perception and awareness, (b) provider operational capacities, and (c) inconsistent vendor supply. Findings reveal three systemic gaps: an information gap obscuring need, a resource/capacity gap crippling delivery, and an economic gap making programmes unsustainable.
Implications: Effective scaling requires moving beyond funding discrete programmes to investing in the foundational pillars of the preventive health ecosystem in Singapore. Addressing information gaps, resource, and economic gaps identified in this study is a necessary step towards making falls prevention a scalable and sustained reality.
Related
- Pre-implementation barriers and facilitators to implementing a physical activity guideline for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a qualitative stakeholder study
- A preliminary qualitative exploration of perceived barriers and facilitators prior to implementation of a pressure injury prevention program in home care: perspectives of care managers in Japan.
- The Views of Clients and Healthcare Professionals on the Perceived Effectiveness of HIV Prevention Programmes in Selected O. R. Tambo District Municipality Clinics
- Food Preferences and Acceptability of Molded Pureed Foods in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Singapore
- Developing and piloting a discrete choice experiment to assess stakeholder preferences for community-based exercise programmes after stroke
BibTeX
@article{lim2026implementation,
title = {{Implementation barriers in Singapore’s community-based falls prevention programmes: a root cause analysis}},
author = {Catherine Wen Huey Lim and Vanessa Koh and Jing Wen Goh and Lakkhina Troeung and Atiqah Lee and Malcolm Ravindran and David B. Matchar and Reshma Merchant and Angelique W. M. Chan},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1913505},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1913505},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Implementation barriers in Singapore’s community-based falls prevention programmes: a root cause analysis
AU - Catherine Wen Huey Lim
AU - Vanessa Koh
AU - Jing Wen Goh
AU - Lakkhina Troeung
AU - Atiqah Lee
AU - Malcolm Ravindran
AU - David B. Matchar
AU - Reshma Merchant
AU - Angelique W. M. Chan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1913505
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1913505
AB - Introduction: Falls are a critical public health challenge for ageing populations. Despite robust evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of multi-component falls prevention programmes (FPPs), a pronounced implementation gap exists in community settings. This study investigates systemic barriers to delivering FPPs in Singapore, focusing on resource constraints, operational capacities, and scaling risks. Methods: This qualitative study employed a structured Facilitated Process Improvement workshop grounded in the Theory of Constraints. Fourteen management representatives from seven diverse Integrated Community Care Providers participated in the half-day workshop. The workshop featured three core activities: (i) capacity mapping of current and projected FPPs delivery capabilities, identification of (ii) challenges in falls risk screening processes and (iii) barriers in programme monitoring and evaluation. Workshop discussions were moderated through probing and clarifying using Categories of Legitimate Reservation, a logical framework to ensure all identified challenges were clearly defined and the causal linkages proposed were logically sound. Workshop insights were systematically analysed through the construction of a Current Reality Tree to map fundamental constraints. Results: The core undesirable effect was the continued prevalence of avoidable injurious falls. Root causes identified included: (1) no systematic effort to inform older adults about falls and falls prevention, (2) community provider lack of training resources, (3) community provider insufficient funding, (4) a lack of both formal and informal data on demand for FPPs, and (5) high manpower cost for vendors to conduct FPPs. Findings from the CRT analysis are organised into three themes: (a) older adult perception and awareness, (b) provider operational capacities, and (c) inconsistent vendor supply. Findings reveal three systemic gaps: an information gap obscuring need, a resource/capacity gap crippling delivery, and an economic gap making programmes unsustainable. Implications: Effective scaling requires moving beyond funding discrete programmes to investing in the foundational pillars of the preventive health ecosystem in Singapore. Addressing information gaps, resource, and economic gaps identified in this study is a necessary step towards making falls prevention a scalable and sustained reality.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -