Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Constructing expert models of adolescent vaping behaviour: A mental models study

  1. 1University of Stavanger: Universitetet i Stavanger

Abstract

Research on vaping prevention messages has predominantly examined adolescents perceptions of and responses and the research exploring how experts perspectives is limited. Expert knowledge is crucial for conceptualising the risk phenomenon and its key causal mechanisms, uncertainties, and issues that are relevant to address in evidence-based communication strategies. This study therefore explored how professionals and experts conceptualise and understand adolescent vaping behaviour, including its perceived causes and drivers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 12 experts from medical research, addiction science, public health prevention, and adolescent-oriented practice in Norway. Data collection and analysis were informed by the mental models approach to risk communication. The analysis identified an expert-derived mental model/influence diagram of adolescent vaping behaviour. Across expert domains, vaping was understood as a multifactorial phenomenon emerging from interacting biological, psychological, and social factors operating across multiple system levels. The first theme describes vaping initiation as a socially embedded and often intermittent practice shaped by identity development, peer belonging, and low perceived harm. The second theme captures how vaping is enabled, sustained, and legitimised through interacting drivers operating across social, structural, commercial, and regulatory contexts. The third theme focuses on reinforcement processes, whereby nicotine dependence and emotional coping mechanisms contribute to more sustained use. According to these expert accounts, adolescent vaping is sustained and legitimised through broader processes of normalisation operating across multiple societal levels. The expert perspectives identified in this study suggest that comparative risk framings of e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes, and the social functions of vaping within adolescent peer cultures, may be important considerations in the development of risk communication targeting adolescents.

Related

  1. Three decades of sexual and reproductive health literacy and information behaviour research on adolescent and young adult males: a scoping review
    Ebenezer Martin-Yeboah, Anabel Quan-Haase
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Immigrant-origin adolescent mental and sexual health disparities in the USA: a scoping review protocol.
    Rebecca Maria Finkelstein, Stephanie Nicole Komasinski, Shandey D Malcolm +1
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Association of low parental mental health literacy with adolescent depression and anxiety: a large-scale cross-sectional study in Guangdong, China
    Xing Wang, Qing Wan, Yanbin Liu +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  4. AI-enabled and comparator digital interventions for adolescent mental health (2020–2025): early detection, human–AI collaboration, and ethical governance—a PRISMA-ScR scoping review
    Noorayisahbe Mohd Yaacob, Mohamed Doheir, Ali Algumaei +4
    Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  5. An expert-informed framework of school conditions potentially supporting adolescent physical activity habits: a three-stage consultation in China
    Shaojuan Hu, Yi Su, Dong Han +5
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{berg2026constructing,
  title = {{Constructing expert models of adolescent vaping behaviour: A mental models study}},
  author = {S. H. Berg and K. Stifjell and K. B. Borch and T. H. Nost and J. Roislien and T. M. Sandanger},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.26.26366558},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.26.26366558v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Constructing expert models of adolescent vaping behaviour: A mental models study
AU  - S. H. Berg
AU  - K. Stifjell
AU  - K. B. Borch
AU  - T. H. Nost
AU  - J. Roislien
AU  - T. M. Sandanger
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.26.26366558
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.26.26366558v1
AB  - Research on vaping prevention messages has predominantly examined adolescents perceptions of and responses and the research exploring how experts perspectives is limited. Expert knowledge is crucial for conceptualising the risk phenomenon and its key causal mechanisms, uncertainties, and issues that are relevant to address in evidence-based communication strategies. This study therefore explored how professionals and experts conceptualise and understand adolescent vaping behaviour, including its perceived causes and drivers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 12 experts from medical research, addiction science, public health prevention, and adolescent-oriented practice in Norway. Data collection and analysis were informed by the mental models approach to risk communication. The analysis identified an expert-derived mental model/influence diagram of adolescent vaping behaviour. Across expert domains, vaping was understood as a multifactorial phenomenon emerging from interacting biological, psychological, and social factors operating across multiple system levels. The first theme describes vaping initiation as a socially embedded and often intermittent practice shaped by identity development, peer belonging, and low perceived harm. The second theme captures how vaping is enabled, sustained, and legitimised through interacting drivers operating across social, structural, commercial, and regulatory contexts. The third theme focuses on reinforcement processes, whereby nicotine dependence and emotional coping mechanisms contribute to more sustained use. According to these expert accounts, adolescent vaping is sustained and legitimised through broader processes of normalisation operating across multiple societal levels. The expert perspectives identified in this study suggest that comparative risk framings of e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes, and the social functions of vaping within adolescent peer cultures, may be important considerations in the development of risk communication targeting adolescents.
ER  -