Reliability of the figure-of-eight method for measuring foot and ankle edema: Prospective emergency department assessment and literature review
- 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Nevşehir State Hospital, Nevşehir, Türkiye
- 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, İzmir, Türkiye
- 3Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Trabzon Of State Hospital, Trabzon, Türkiye
Abstract
Objective:: This study aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the figure-of-eight (FoE) method for measuring foot and ankle edema when performed by emergency medicine and orthopedic residents in the emergency department (ED).
Methods:: This prospective observational study was conducted at the ED of a tertiary hospital between November 2024 and January 2025. A total of 102 adult patients with foot or ankle trauma (51 males and 51 females) were included. The mean age was 38.1 ± 13.1 years. Twenty residents (10 orthopedic and 10 emergency medicine residents) performed FoE measurements. Each patient underwent eight measurements, with two repeated measurements by two raters from each specialty. The primary outcome measures were inter- and intra-rater reliability, assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals, as well as the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC).
Results: : A total of 102 patients were analyzed. Intra-rater reliability was excellent for both emergency medicine residents (ICC = 0.987, 95% CI: 0.980–0.991, P < 0.001) and orthopedic residents (ICC = 0.984, 95% CI: 0.977–0.990, P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was also excellent for emergency medicine residents (ICC = 0.968, 95% CI: 0.953–0.978, P < 0.001), orthopedic residents (ICC = 0.960, 95% CI: 0.941–0.973, P < 0.001), and between both specialty groups (ICC = 0.951, 95% CI: 0.928–0.967, P < 0.001). SEM ranged from 0.57 to 1.12 cm, while MDC ranged from 1.57 to 1.75 cm for intra-rater reliability and from 2.46 to 3.10 cm for inter-rater reliability.
Conclusion: : The FoE method demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability for bedside assessment of foot and ankle edema in the emergency department. These findings support its use as a simple, inexpensive, and standardized tool for reproducible clinical assessment by both orthopedic and emergency medicine residents. The method may facilitate consistent serial evaluation of patients with acute foot and ankle trauma in routine emergency practice. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its criterion validity and responsiveness.
Level of Evidence:: Level II, Diagnostic Study.
Related
- Rater Dependence in Emergency Department Catheter-Appropriateness Audits: A Prospective Three-Rater Study of Item-Level Reliability
- Poor reliability in measuring habituation: Implications for clinical and translational research on exposure and extinction
- Emergency Department Pediatric Early Warning System for Identifying Resuscitation-Defined Critical Illness in Children: A Prospective Diagnostic Classification Study in Vietnam
- Sociodemographic and Clinical Profile of Homeless Patients Attending the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Centre in Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India: A Prospective Observational Study
- A simple maximum intensity projection method for measuring proximal femoral anteversion: An observer reliability study.
BibTeX
@article{altan2026reliability,
title = {{Reliability of the figure-of-eight method for measuring foot and ankle edema: Prospective emergency department assessment and literature review}},
author = {Seyit Mehmet Altan and Murat Yeşilaras and Necmiye Yalçın Ocak and Oğulcan Parlar},
journal = {Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.5152/j.aott.2026.26962},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2026.26962},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Reliability of the figure-of-eight method for measuring foot and ankle edema: Prospective emergency department assessment and literature review
AU - Seyit Mehmet Altan
AU - Murat Yeşilaras
AU - Necmiye Yalçın Ocak
AU - Oğulcan Parlar
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/04
JO - Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
DO - 10.5152/j.aott.2026.26962
UR - https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2026.26962
AB - Objective:: This study aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the figure-of-eight (FoE) method for measuring foot and ankle edema when performed by emergency medicine and orthopedic residents in the emergency department (ED). Methods:: This prospective observational study was conducted at the ED of a tertiary hospital between November 2024 and January 2025. A total of 102 adult patients with foot or ankle trauma (51 males and 51 females) were included. The mean age was 38.1 ± 13.1 years. Twenty residents (10 orthopedic and 10 emergency medicine residents) performed FoE measurements. Each patient underwent eight measurements, with two repeated measurements by two raters from each specialty. The primary outcome measures were inter- and intra-rater reliability, assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals, as well as the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results: : A total of 102 patients were analyzed. Intra-rater reliability was excellent for both emergency medicine residents (ICC = 0.987, 95% CI: 0.980–0.991, P < 0.001) and orthopedic residents (ICC = 0.984, 95% CI: 0.977–0.990, P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was also excellent for emergency medicine residents (ICC = 0.968, 95% CI: 0.953–0.978, P < 0.001), orthopedic residents (ICC = 0.960, 95% CI: 0.941–0.973, P < 0.001), and between both specialty groups (ICC = 0.951, 95% CI: 0.928–0.967, P < 0.001). SEM ranged from 0.57 to 1.12 cm, while MDC ranged from 1.57 to 1.75 cm for intra-rater reliability and from 2.46 to 3.10 cm for inter-rater reliability. Conclusion: : The FoE method demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability for bedside assessment of foot and ankle edema in the emergency department. These findings support its use as a simple, inexpensive, and standardized tool for reproducible clinical assessment by both orthopedic and emergency medicine residents. The method may facilitate consistent serial evaluation of patients with acute foot and ankle trauma in routine emergency practice. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its criterion validity and responsiveness. Level of Evidence:: Level II, Diagnostic Study.
SN - 1017-995X
SN - 2589-1294
ER -