Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Digital intervention to reduce minority stress in sexual and gender minority populations: a pilot feasibility and usability study

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention (iACT) for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other sexually and gender diverse (LGBTQIA+) individuals, while exploring preliminary changes in minority stress and wellbeing-related outcomes. We conducted a four-week pilot study with randomized pre-post design of a self-help iACT program adapted for LGBTQIA+ individuals. Data were collected between June and September 2025. Participants ( N = 85; experimental n = 35, control n = 50) completed baseline and post-intervention assessments of depression, anxiety, stress, psychological flexibility, emotion regulation, minority stress, resilience, and usability. The program demonstrated excellent usability. Participant feedback indicated that the intervention was perceived as useful, accessible, and affirming, promoting self-acceptance, introspection, and reflection. Qualitative feedback also identified limitations, including tasks perceived as overly guided or repetitive, lengthy audio materials, and limited personalization. Exploratory analyses showed that participants in the experimental group demonstrated significant pre-post improvements in psychological distress, stress, emotional clarity, goal-directed behavior, and anticipated discrimination, which survived correction for multiple comparisons, with small-to-large effect sizes. Between-group comparisons favored the experimental group on stress, emotional clarity, and anticipated discrimination, with small-to-medium effect sizes, although these differences did not remain significant after correction. A key limitation was the high and uneven attrition rate (51.4% in the experimental group vs. 15.3% in controls), which warrants caution in interpreting exploratory outcome findings. Overall, findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a self-help iACT program tailored for LGBTQIA+ individuals and suggest preliminary changes in stress, minority stress, and emotion regulation. These results may inform future trials evaluating queer-affirmative digital interventions for individuals facing stigma, non-disclosure, or structural barriers to care.

Related

  1. Feasibility, acceptability and usability of InControl web-platform intervention for older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A mixed-methods pilot study protocol
    David Oliveira, Nelson P. Rocha, Anabela G. Silva
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClinical trials & evidence synthesisPLOS
  2. Cyberbullying, Digital Victimisation and Suicidality Among Adolescents and Sexual and Gender Minority Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Debayan Mandal, Roshan Sutar, Ashish Pakhre +2
    Annals of neurosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEurope PMC
  3. Feasibility and Usability of a Digital Perinatal Navigator for High-Risk Pregnancies: Mixed Methods Study.
    Michelle Foerstel, Kristina Killinger, Mitho Mueller +10
    Journal of medical Internet researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  4. Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Digital Cognitive Intervention for Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC) in Older Adults
    Cutter A. Lindbergh, Roger Altizer, James J. Grady +3
    The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric PsychiatryPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeurologyPMC
  5. Digital Resilience-Based Course-Game Sequential Intervention for Social Participation in Stroke Survivors: Development and Usability Study.
    Xuan Zhou, You Lv, Runlin Liu +2
    JMIR serious gamesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{bonato2026digital,
  title = {{Digital intervention to reduce minority stress in sexual and gender minority populations: a pilot feasibility and usability study}},
  author = {Marina Bonato and Paolo Meneguzzo and Martina Bonzanini and Alberto Scala and Andrea Garolla and Marina Miscioscia},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-70953-0},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-70953-0},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Digital intervention to reduce minority stress in sexual and gender minority populations: a pilot feasibility and usability study
AU  - Marina Bonato
AU  - Paolo Meneguzzo
AU  - Martina Bonzanini
AU  - Alberto Scala
AU  - Andrea Garolla
AU  - Marina Miscioscia
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-70953-0
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-70953-0
AB  - This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention (iACT) for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other sexually and gender diverse (LGBTQIA+) individuals, while exploring preliminary changes in minority stress and wellbeing-related outcomes. We conducted a four-week pilot study with randomized pre-post design of a self-help iACT program adapted for LGBTQIA+ individuals. Data were collected between June and September 2025. Participants ( N = 85; experimental n = 35, control n = 50) completed baseline and post-intervention assessments of depression, anxiety, stress, psychological flexibility, emotion regulation, minority stress, resilience, and usability. The program demonstrated excellent usability. Participant feedback indicated that the intervention was perceived as useful, accessible, and affirming, promoting self-acceptance, introspection, and reflection. Qualitative feedback also identified limitations, including tasks perceived as overly guided or repetitive, lengthy audio materials, and limited personalization. Exploratory analyses showed that participants in the experimental group demonstrated significant pre-post improvements in psychological distress, stress, emotional clarity, goal-directed behavior, and anticipated discrimination, which survived correction for multiple comparisons, with small-to-large effect sizes. Between-group comparisons favored the experimental group on stress, emotional clarity, and anticipated discrimination, with small-to-medium effect sizes, although these differences did not remain significant after correction. A key limitation was the high and uneven attrition rate (51.4% in the experimental group vs. 15.3% in controls), which warrants caution in interpreting exploratory outcome findings. Overall, findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a self-help iACT program tailored for LGBTQIA+ individuals and suggest preliminary changes in stress, minority stress, and emotion regulation. These results may inform future trials evaluating queer-affirmative digital interventions for individuals facing stigma, non-disclosure, or structural barriers to care.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -