Beyond Reported Rates: A Critical Narrative Review of the Risk Architecture, Early Recognition, and Prevention of Complications in Gynecologic Laparoscopy.
- 1Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic "NarodniFront", 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
- 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Abstract
Reported complication rates in gynecologic laparoscopy are widely used as indicators of safety, yet they often describe fundamentally different clinical realities. Variations in definitions, severity classification, duration of follow-up, and procedural context mean that superficially similar outcomes are frequently not comparable. As a result, the literature is rich in data, but limited in interpretability. This review addresses that gap by critically examining complications not only as events but as phenomena shaped by methodological heterogeneity, procedural complexity, and the conditions under which they are recognized. A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed, with additional manual reference screening. Given the predominance of heterogeneous retrospective series, cohort studies, registries, and targeted systematic reviews, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. Across studies, the most clinically significant complications remain hemorrhage, bowel injury, and urinary tract injury, while pneumoperitoneum-related events, vaginal cuff dehiscence, port-site complications, port-site metastasis, and morcellation-related dissemination represent rarer but disproportionately consequential outcomes. Importantly, complication risk consistently clusters around identifiable domains, including prior surgery and adhesions, procedural complexity, energy use, operative duration, surgeon experience, and center-level standardization. This review shows that complications in gynecologic laparoscopy cannot be meaningfully interpreted through incidence alone. Their true clinical significance lies in the interaction between risk architecture, intraoperative decision-making, and the timeliness of postoperative recognition. The principal contribution of this work is therefore not a single summary rate but a clinically oriented framework that integrates interpretation of the literature with practical principles of prevention and early diagnosis.
Related
- Early Post-Operative Gynecologic Complications of Persistent Cloaca Reconstruction: A Single-Institution Review of 45 Cloacal Reconstructions
- Perioperative inflammation in gynecologic oncology: nursing strategies for enhanced recovery and complication prevention
- Urinary complications following Bricker urinary diversion in gynecologic cancer: A retrospective analysis of 77 cases
- Complication Prevention in Combined Abdominoplasty and Gynecologic Procedures: A Multidisciplinary Narrative Review
- Perioperative transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
BibTeX
@article{maglic2026beyond,
title = {{Beyond Reported Rates: A Critical Narrative Review of the Risk Architecture, Early Recognition, and Prevention of Complications in Gynecologic Laparoscopy.}},
author = {Rastko Maglic and Milica Ivanovic and Ksenija Lalic and Dragana Maglic and Jelena Stulic and Stefan Ivanovic},
journal = {Clinics and practice},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.3390/clinpract16100176},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930362},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Beyond Reported Rates: A Critical Narrative Review of the Risk Architecture, Early Recognition, and Prevention of Complications in Gynecologic Laparoscopy.
AU - Rastko Maglic
AU - Milica Ivanovic
AU - Ksenija Lalic
AU - Dragana Maglic
AU - Jelena Stulic
AU - Stefan Ivanovic
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/22
JO - Clinics and practice
DO - 10.3390/clinpract16100176
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930362
AB - Reported complication rates in gynecologic laparoscopy are widely used as indicators of safety, yet they often describe fundamentally different clinical realities. Variations in definitions, severity classification, duration of follow-up, and procedural context mean that superficially similar outcomes are frequently not comparable. As a result, the literature is rich in data, but limited in interpretability. This review addresses that gap by critically examining complications not only as events but as phenomena shaped by methodological heterogeneity, procedural complexity, and the conditions under which they are recognized. A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed, with additional manual reference screening. Given the predominance of heterogeneous retrospective series, cohort studies, registries, and targeted systematic reviews, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. Across studies, the most clinically significant complications remain hemorrhage, bowel injury, and urinary tract injury, while pneumoperitoneum-related events, vaginal cuff dehiscence, port-site complications, port-site metastasis, and morcellation-related dissemination represent rarer but disproportionately consequential outcomes. Importantly, complication risk consistently clusters around identifiable domains, including prior surgery and adhesions, procedural complexity, energy use, operative duration, surgeon experience, and center-level standardization. This review shows that complications in gynecologic laparoscopy cannot be meaningfully interpreted through incidence alone. Their true clinical significance lies in the interaction between risk architecture, intraoperative decision-making, and the timeliness of postoperative recognition. The principal contribution of this work is therefore not a single summary rate but a clinically oriented framework that integrates interpretation of the literature with practical principles of prevention and early diagnosis.
SN - 2039-7275
SN - 2039-7283
ER -