Evaluation of Cross-slice Imputation for Spatial Proteomics
- 1University of California, Santa Cruz
Abstract
Spatial single-cell protein profiling is at the forefront of translational medicine research efforts that try to decipher tissue heterogeneity. However, existing experimental approaches are limited in the number of biomarkers that they measure. This has motivated extensive research into the problem of protein imputation, where proteins or biomarkers not directly measured in a given slice of biopsy tissue are learned from those measured. In this work, we focus on the specific problem of cross-slice protein imputation (CSPI). In the CSPI problem, two sets of biomarker expressions at the single-cell level are known for physically adjacent slices of tissue. Each slice has its own known set of biomarkers, which overlaps with but does not subsume that of the adjacent. For each slice, we wish to learn the expressions of the proteins unique to the adjacent. Existing literature for protein imputation methodologies can be grouped in two categories: learning-based and alignment-based approaches. Learning-based approaches do not account for spatial and structural similarities between the training and the target sets. Alignment based approaches aim to determine an association between cells in adjacent slices, but without the explicit goal of using this alignment for imputation. In this work, we evaluate several methods from both categories and their adaptability to the cross-slice protein imputation problem. We provide a statistical analysis of all methods' performance under varying conditions of implementation. We find that learning-based methods significantly outperform alignment-based methods at the task of cross-slice protein imputation, with the latter more suited to the task of inter-slice interpolation or 3D tissue reconstruction. Moreover, inter-patient imputation is far less accurate than intra-patient imputation for all methods evaluated.
Related
- DeSPA uncovers genes with cross-state spatial pattern remodeling and coordinated spatial programs across multi-slice spatial transcriptomics atlases
- A Unified Framework for Batch Correction and Imputation in Modern Mass Spectrometry Proteomics
- Rank-Preserving Alignment Enables Cross-platform Learning and Phenotyping for Single-Cell and Spatial Proteomics
- Spatial organization and mitigation of autofluorescence in multiplexed spatial proteomics of aged fresh-frozen human brain
- Subcellular spatial proteomics of the close animal relative, Capsaspora owczarzaki
BibTeX
@misc{bondar2026evaluation,
title = {{Evaluation of Cross-slice Imputation for Spatial Proteomics}},
author = {G. A. Bondar and B. Bozorgui and A. Korkut and A. Halder},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.27.762306},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762306v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Evaluation of Cross-slice Imputation for Spatial Proteomics
AU - G. A. Bondar
AU - B. Bozorgui
AU - A. Korkut
AU - A. Halder
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.27.762306
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762306v1
AB - Spatial single-cell protein profiling is at the forefront of translational medicine research efforts that try to decipher tissue heterogeneity. However, existing experimental approaches are limited in the number of biomarkers that they measure. This has motivated extensive research into the problem of protein imputation, where proteins or biomarkers not directly measured in a given slice of biopsy tissue are learned from those measured. In this work, we focus on the specific problem of cross-slice protein imputation (CSPI). In the CSPI problem, two sets of biomarker expressions at the single-cell level are known for physically adjacent slices of tissue. Each slice has its own known set of biomarkers, which overlaps with but does not subsume that of the adjacent. For each slice, we wish to learn the expressions of the proteins unique to the adjacent. Existing literature for protein imputation methodologies can be grouped in two categories: learning-based and alignment-based approaches. Learning-based approaches do not account for spatial and structural similarities between the training and the target sets. Alignment based approaches aim to determine an association between cells in adjacent slices, but without the explicit goal of using this alignment for imputation. In this work, we evaluate several methods from both categories and their adaptability to the cross-slice protein imputation problem. We provide a statistical analysis of all methods' performance under varying conditions of implementation. We find that learning-based methods significantly outperform alignment-based methods at the task of cross-slice protein imputation, with the latter more suited to the task of inter-slice interpolation or 3D tissue reconstruction. Moreover, inter-patient imputation is far less accurate than intra-patient imputation for all methods evaluated.
ER -