Remote supervised exercise- and physical activity-based rehabilitation for post-stroke depression, anxiety, and quality of life: a systematic review, evidence map, and exploratory quantitative synthesis
- 1College of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University
- 2School of Physical Education, Sichuan Minzu College
Abstract
Background: Depression, anxiety, and reduced quality of life are common after stroke and may interfere with rehabilitation engagement and long-term recovery. Remote supervision can support home-based exercise or physical activity, but the available programs are complex packages that may also include coaching, caregiver involvement, education, and psychological support. We aimed to synthesize randomized evidence on depression, anxiety, and quality of life after remotely supervised exercise- or physical activity-based stroke rehabilitation, accounting for comparator type and co-interventions.
Methods: This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261394314) and reported according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to 1 March 2026. Randomized studies of remotely supervised exercise- or physical activity-based rehabilitation after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were eligible if depression, anxiety, or quality-of-life outcomes were extractable. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, certainty was evaluated using GRADE, and a co-intervention sensitivity analysis examined the evidence remaining after exclusion of interventions with explicit psychological support.
Results: Six randomized studies involving 483 participants were included. Interventions, comparators, outcome instruments, and study designs were heterogeneous, precluding a primary pooled meta-analysis. The only directly analyzable depression effect against standard care came from Sun et al., a 12-week multidisciplinary telerehabilitation program that included online psychological counseling; the aligned Hedges g was 0.93 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.22), conventionally large, but certainty was very low. After this trial was excluded, no directly analyzable depression effect against standard care remained. Active-vs-active depression or distress findings did not establish superiority. Quality-of-life signals varied across instruments and comparators; no separable patient anxiety effect was available.
Conclusion: The included evidence concerns complex remote rehabilitation packages rather than exercise alone. A possible depression benefit is supported principally by one trial with a psychological-support co-intervention and is therefore fragile. Remote programs should not be regarded as stand-alone treatments for post-stroke depression or anxiety. Confirmatory trials should recruit or stratify participants by baseline psychiatric symptoms, prespecify psychiatric outcomes, and separate exercise from psychological and implementation components.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261394314 , identifier CRD420261394314.
Related
- Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Hemorrhagic Presentation in Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Systematic Review With Exploratory Quantitative Synthesis
- Predictive roles of inflammatory indicators (NLR, PLR, LMR and SII) in poststroke depression rehabilitation: a systematic review.
- Retinal and Choroidal Microvascular Changes Across the Migraine Attack Cycle: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Quantitative Synthesis
- Quantitative Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion in Multiparametric Prostate MRI: An Exploratory Intra-Patient Study Differentiating Malignant Lesions from Normal Tissue
- Quantitative Whole-Leg Radiographic Assessment of Coronal Knee–Ankle Alignment: Associations with Talar Inclination and Exploratory Changes After Knee Osteotomy
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026remote,
title = {{Remote supervised exercise- and physical activity-based rehabilitation for post-stroke depression, anxiety, and quality of life: a systematic review, evidence map, and exploratory quantitative synthesis}},
author = {Cheng Zhang and Zhou Zhou and Jie Cai and Yuanyuan Li},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1888180},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1888180/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Remote supervised exercise- and physical activity-based rehabilitation for post-stroke depression, anxiety, and quality of life: a systematic review, evidence map, and exploratory quantitative synthesis
AU - Cheng Zhang
AU - Zhou Zhou
AU - Jie Cai
AU - Yuanyuan Li
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1888180
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1888180/full
AB - Background: Depression, anxiety, and reduced quality of life are common after stroke and may interfere with rehabilitation engagement and long-term recovery. Remote supervision can support home-based exercise or physical activity, but the available programs are complex packages that may also include coaching, caregiver involvement, education, and psychological support. We aimed to synthesize randomized evidence on depression, anxiety, and quality of life after remotely supervised exercise- or physical activity-based stroke rehabilitation, accounting for comparator type and co-interventions. Methods: This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261394314) and reported according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to 1 March 2026. Randomized studies of remotely supervised exercise- or physical activity-based rehabilitation after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were eligible if depression, anxiety, or quality-of-life outcomes were extractable. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, certainty was evaluated using GRADE, and a co-intervention sensitivity analysis examined the evidence remaining after exclusion of interventions with explicit psychological support. Results: Six randomized studies involving 483 participants were included. Interventions, comparators, outcome instruments, and study designs were heterogeneous, precluding a primary pooled meta-analysis. The only directly analyzable depression effect against standard care came from Sun et al., a 12-week multidisciplinary telerehabilitation program that included online psychological counseling; the aligned Hedges g was 0.93 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.22), conventionally large, but certainty was very low. After this trial was excluded, no directly analyzable depression effect against standard care remained. Active-vs-active depression or distress findings did not establish superiority. Quality-of-life signals varied across instruments and comparators; no separable patient anxiety effect was available. Conclusion: The included evidence concerns complex remote rehabilitation packages rather than exercise alone. A possible depression benefit is supported principally by one trial with a psychological-support co-intervention and is therefore fragile. Remote programs should not be regarded as stand-alone treatments for post-stroke depression or anxiety. Confirmatory trials should recruit or stratify participants by baseline psychiatric symptoms, prespecify psychiatric outcomes, and separate exercise from psychological and implementation components. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261394314 , identifier CRD420261394314.
SN - 1664-0640
ER -