Considerations for cervical medial branch nerve radiofrequency at spinal motion segments adjacent to cervical fusion constructs: a technical note
Abstract
Background: Cervical fusion alters regional biomechanics and increases load transmission through adjacent facet joints, which may produce facet-mediated pain. Cervical medial branch blocks (MBBs) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remain highly useful diagnostic and therapeutic interventions; however, surgical approaches used in cervical fusion frequently disrupt the cervical medial branch nerves (MBNs) at treated levels. Identifying which MBNs remain anatomically intact is essential for accurate diagnostic and therapeutic targeting of relevant nerves (and sensate facet joints) and for avoiding unnecessary procedure levels or procedures altogether.
Objective: To present an approach to determining which cervical medial branches require management after fusion, drawing upon the surgical approach, anatomic landmarks, implant trajectory, and cross-sectional imaging.
Design: Technical note.
Setting: Cervical RFA following spinal fusion surgery.
Conclusions: A systematic, anatomy-based method improves diagnostic precision, reduces unnecessary procedures, and helps identify patients most likely to benefit from interventions. Posterior cervical fusion using modern screw-and-rod instrumentation will essentially always result in denervation of the MBN at the operated level(s). Anterior surgical approaches reliably preserve the MBNs, making them viable targets for cervical RFA.
Related
- A novel and simple Inflation-deflation method with inflated targeted segments for confirming the intersegmental border under video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a technical note.
- Surgical explantation following early transcatheter aortic valve failure: Technical considerations for complex situations.
- Arthroscopic Circumferential Labral Repair and Biceps Tenodesis in Elite Throwing Athletes: Technical Considerations
- Preservation of Non-nidal Medial Veins During Microsurgical Resection of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Technical Considerations and Early Clinical Outcomes
- Technical considerations in endovascular thrombectomy for distal vessel occlusions
BibTeX
@article{truumees2026considerations,
title = {{Considerations for cervical medial branch nerve radiofrequency at spinal motion segments adjacent to cervical fusion constructs: a technical note}},
author = {Heili Truumees and Robert M Amick and Joel Turtle and Nicholas T Spina and Robert W Hurley and Zachary L McCormick and Brian A Karamian},
journal = {Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1093/pm/pnag079},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnag079},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Considerations for cervical medial branch nerve radiofrequency at spinal motion segments adjacent to cervical fusion constructs: a technical note
AU - Heili Truumees
AU - Robert M Amick
AU - Joel Turtle
AU - Nicholas T Spina
AU - Robert W Hurley
AU - Zachary L McCormick
AU - Brian A Karamian
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/25
JO - Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine
DO - 10.1093/pm/pnag079
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnag079
AB - Background: Cervical fusion alters regional biomechanics and increases load transmission through adjacent facet joints, which may produce facet-mediated pain. Cervical medial branch blocks (MBBs) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remain highly useful diagnostic and therapeutic interventions; however, surgical approaches used in cervical fusion frequently disrupt the cervical medial branch nerves (MBNs) at treated levels. Identifying which MBNs remain anatomically intact is essential for accurate diagnostic and therapeutic targeting of relevant nerves (and sensate facet joints) and for avoiding unnecessary procedure levels or procedures altogether. Objective: To present an approach to determining which cervical medial branches require management after fusion, drawing upon the surgical approach, anatomic landmarks, implant trajectory, and cross-sectional imaging. Design: Technical note. Setting: Cervical RFA following spinal fusion surgery. Conclusions: A systematic, anatomy-based method improves diagnostic precision, reduces unnecessary procedures, and helps identify patients most likely to benefit from interventions. Posterior cervical fusion using modern screw-and-rod instrumentation will essentially always result in denervation of the MBN at the operated level(s). Anterior surgical approaches reliably preserve the MBNs, making them viable targets for cervical RFA.
SN - 1526-2375
SN - 1526-4637
ER -