Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Cancer

Patterns of failure in metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC treated with crizotinib: implications for consolidative stereotactic body radiotherapy

  1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
  2. 2Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China

Abstract

Background: Acquired resistance limits durable control with crizotinib in metastatic ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We characterized residual disease and initial progression patterns and identified predictors of candidates for consolidative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Methods: Patients with stage IV ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with crizotinib (2017–2024) were retrospectively reviewed. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1. Initial progression was classified as original-site failure (OF), new-site failure (NF), or combined OF and NF (ONF). SBRT eligibility at maximal response was determined using NRG-BR001 criteria and predefined cranial stereotactic radiotherapy criteria. Predictors of eligibility were evaluated using penalized selection followed by logistic regression.

Results: Sixty patients were analyzed. Median time to maximal response was 3.5 months; 15 (25.0%) met SBRT eligibility criteria. Progression occurred in 83.3% (median time to progression, 14.1 months), and oligoprogression occurred in 56%. Lung (50%) and brain (35.7%) were the most common progression sites; initial failure occurred as OF in 34%, NF in 40%, and ONF in 26%. Notably, among SBRT-eligible patients, 66.7% progressed—most often in the brain (50%) and lung (33.3%)—with failures skewed toward NF (50%) rather than OF (30%) or ONF (20%). Independent predictors of SBRT eligibility were female sex, N0–2 disease, absence of baseline bone metastases, and involvement of < 2 metastatic organs.

Conclusions: Progression on crizotinib is frequently oligoprogressive and commonly involves intrathoracic disease, with substantial contributions from both baseline-lesion progression and new-site failure. Consolidative SBRT appears feasible in a subset at maximal response. The identified predictors of SBRT eligibility should be considered exploratory and require external validation in larger prospective cohorts.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16600-3.

Related

  1. Estimating Individualized Survival Benefit of Consolidative Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy Following Chemoimmunotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Exclusive Distant Metastasis.
    Xuguang Wang, Shuwei Chen, Xing Zhang +11
    MedCommPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Spontaneous Pneumothorax During Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Metastasis From Osteosarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Vikash Kumar, Praveen K Bansal, Arun Pandey +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Before Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma : A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial
    Raquibul Hannan, Lin Lin, Ryan Assadi +13
    JAMA oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. 473 Effect of nivolumab with or without relatlimab after stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer
    Chen Hu, Valsamo Anagnostou, Gavin Pereira +11
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYImmunologyOncologyDOAJ
  5. Effect of Risedronate on Rib Cortical Thickness After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Peripheral Lung Tumors: Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial
    Ryan T. Hughes, Paul J. Black, India R. Wood +10
    JTO clinical and research reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{wang2026patterns,
  title = {{Patterns of failure in metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC treated with crizotinib: implications for consolidative stereotactic body radiotherapy}},
  author = {Zhili Wang and Zexi Xu and Lulu Wang and Mao Sun and Jueling Tan and Wei Zhou and Yongzhong Wu and Dan Tao},
  journal = {BMC Cancer},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12885-026-16600-3},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16600-3},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Patterns of failure in metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC treated with crizotinib: implications for consolidative stereotactic body radiotherapy
AU  - Zhili Wang
AU  - Zexi Xu
AU  - Lulu Wang
AU  - Mao Sun
AU  - Jueling Tan
AU  - Wei Zhou
AU  - Yongzhong Wu
AU  - Dan Tao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/07
JO  - BMC Cancer
DO  - 10.1186/s12885-026-16600-3
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16600-3
AB  - Background: Acquired resistance limits durable control with crizotinib in metastatic ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We characterized residual disease and initial progression patterns and identified predictors of candidates for consolidative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).  Methods: Patients with stage IV ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with crizotinib (2017–2024) were retrospectively reviewed. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1. Initial progression was classified as original-site failure (OF), new-site failure (NF), or combined OF and NF (ONF). SBRT eligibility at maximal response was determined using NRG-BR001 criteria and predefined cranial stereotactic radiotherapy criteria. Predictors of eligibility were evaluated using penalized selection followed by logistic regression.  Results: Sixty patients were analyzed. Median time to maximal response was 3.5 months; 15 (25.0%) met SBRT eligibility criteria. Progression occurred in 83.3% (median time to progression, 14.1 months), and oligoprogression occurred in 56%. Lung (50%) and brain (35.7%) were the most common progression sites; initial failure occurred as OF in 34%, NF in 40%, and ONF in 26%. Notably, among SBRT-eligible patients, 66.7% progressed—most often in the brain (50%) and lung (33.3%)—with failures skewed toward NF (50%) rather than OF (30%) or ONF (20%). Independent predictors of SBRT eligibility were female sex, N0–2 disease, absence of baseline bone metastases, and involvement of < 2 metastatic organs.  Conclusions: Progression on crizotinib is frequently oligoprogressive and commonly involves intrathoracic disease, with substantial contributions from both baseline-lesion progression and new-site failure. Consolidative SBRT appears feasible in a subset at maximal response. The identified predictors of SBRT eligibility should be considered exploratory and require external validation in larger prospective cohorts.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16600-3.
SN  - 1471-2407
ER  -