Trauma scoring systems for evaluating trauma center triage criteria in older adults: a retrospective cohort study.
- 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Emergency Medical Services, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Michałowskiego St. 12, 31-126, Krakow, Poland. [email protected].
- 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Emergency Medical Services, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Michałowskiego St. 12, 31-126, Krakow, Poland.
- 3Faculty of Health Sciences, Clinic of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Abstract
Background
Standardized trauma assessment is essential for early clinical decision-making; however, it remains challenging in older adults because age-related physiological changes may obscure injury severity. Accurate triage is critical to ensure timely access to trauma centers (TCs). While triage decisions must rely on immediately available clinical findings, advanced trauma scoring systems are typically based on diagnostic data obtained later in the course of care. Although these tools are not suitable for real-time triage, they are established predictors of mortality and may provide an objective basis for evaluating TC qualification criteria. Because current national TC qualification criteria do not adequately account for age-specific factors, they may contribute to undertriage in older patients. This study aimed to retrospectively identify the trauma scoring system most suitable for evaluating TC qualification criteria in geriatric trauma patients.Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the emergency department of a single clinical hospital with a TC between 2017 and 2020. Among 155,320 ED admissions, 6,541 trauma patients aged ≥ 65 years were identified. Injury severity and physiological status were assessed using the coded Revised Trauma Score (RTSc), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). A predefined subgroup of patients meeting national TC qualification criteria (TC group 65+) was analyzed separately. Predictive performance for in-hospital mortality was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results
TRISS showed the highest discrimination for in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.888), followed by ISS (0.867) and RTSc (0.687). In the TC group 65+, the mean TRISS-predicted survival probability was 34.58%, whereas observed in-hospital survival was 48.72%. The estimated undertriage rate was 73.47%, suggesting that current national TC qualification criteria may perform inadequately in older trauma patients.Conclusion
Current national TC qualification criteria may contribute to undertriage among older patients, potentially delaying access to advanced trauma care. Among the evaluated scoring systems, TRISS demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance for in-hospital mortality and appears to be the most suitable retrospective reference standard for assessing TC qualification criteria in geriatric trauma patients.
Related
- Clinical utility and limitations of transcranial Doppler in evaluating pediatric brain death or death by neurologic criteria: a 10-year retrospective study
- The Correlation of PD-L1 Expression with Tumor Budding: Evaluating the Significance of Scoring Differences in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Prognostic value of scoring systems in geriatric patients receiving warfarin presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- Association between delayed thromboprophylaxis and the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with pelvic trauma: a retrospective cohort adjusted for severity at a level I trauma center
- National assessment of trauma care system capacity in Ecuador: Evaluating institutional resources and practitioner KAPS domains
BibTeX
@article{sulejniemiec2026trauma,
title = {{Trauma scoring systems for evaluating trauma center triage criteria in older adults: a retrospective cohort study.}},
author = {Małgorzata Sulej-Niemiec and Andrzej Kopta and Magdalena Żurowska-Wolak and Łukasz Kręglicki and Mirosław Szura},
journal = {International journal of emergency medicine},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12245-026-01315-w},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928129},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Trauma scoring systems for evaluating trauma center triage criteria in older adults: a retrospective cohort study.
AU - Małgorzata Sulej-Niemiec
AU - Andrzej Kopta
AU - Magdalena Żurowska-Wolak
AU - Łukasz Kręglicki
AU - Mirosław Szura
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/29
JO - International journal of emergency medicine
DO - 10.1186/s12245-026-01315-w
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928129
AB - Background Standardized trauma assessment is essential for early clinical decision-making; however, it remains challenging in older adults because age-related physiological changes may obscure injury severity. Accurate triage is critical to ensure timely access to trauma centers (TCs). While triage decisions must rely on immediately available clinical findings, advanced trauma scoring systems are typically based on diagnostic data obtained later in the course of care. Although these tools are not suitable for real-time triage, they are established predictors of mortality and may provide an objective basis for evaluating TC qualification criteria. Because current national TC qualification criteria do not adequately account for age-specific factors, they may contribute to undertriage in older patients. This study aimed to retrospectively identify the trauma scoring system most suitable for evaluating TC qualification criteria in geriatric trauma patients.Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the emergency department of a single clinical hospital with a TC between 2017 and 2020. Among 155,320 ED admissions, 6,541 trauma patients aged ≥ 65 years were identified. Injury severity and physiological status were assessed using the coded Revised Trauma Score (RTSc), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). A predefined subgroup of patients meeting national TC qualification criteria (TC group 65+) was analyzed separately. Predictive performance for in-hospital mortality was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results TRISS showed the highest discrimination for in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.888), followed by ISS (0.867) and RTSc (0.687). In the TC group 65+, the mean TRISS-predicted survival probability was 34.58%, whereas observed in-hospital survival was 48.72%. The estimated undertriage rate was 73.47%, suggesting that current national TC qualification criteria may perform inadequately in older trauma patients.Conclusion Current national TC qualification criteria may contribute to undertriage among older patients, potentially delaying access to advanced trauma care. Among the evaluated scoring systems, TRISS demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance for in-hospital mortality and appears to be the most suitable retrospective reference standard for assessing TC qualification criteria in geriatric trauma patients.
SN - 1865-1372
SN - 1865-1380
ER -