Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Integrative Cancer Therapies

Acupuncture and Related Therapies for Breast Cancer-Related Symptoms: An Evidence Map

  1. 1Korean Medicine Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  2. 2Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy among women worldwide. Despite advances in medical treatment, many survivors experience distressing symptoms and therapy-related side effects that impair quality of life. Acupuncture-related therapies are increasingly employed as supportive care strategies, yet their evidence base remains fragmented.

Objective: To construct an evidence map of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses evaluating acupuncture and related therapies for breast cancer-related symptoms.

Methods: Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Research Information Service System (RISS), Oriental Medicine Advanced Search Integrated System (OASIS), and Korean Studies Information Services System (KISS) from inception to April 24, 2025. Eligible SRs included breast cancer populations, any acupuncture-related intervention, and reported outcomes relevant to symptom management or treatment side effects. Data extraction included bibliographic details, intervention type, outcomes, number of studies, sample size, effect direction, and methodological quality (AMSTAR-2). Evidence was synthesized descriptively and presented using heatmaps.

Results: A total of 47 SRs with meta-analysis were included, covering 11 distinct symptom domains and 6 categories of interventions. The most frequently studied outcomes were hot flashes (n=9), general supportive care during chemotherapy (n=9), lymphedema (n=7), general side effect management (n=6), and aromatase inhibitor-associated arthralgia (n=4). The most common interventions were acupuncture (n=17), acupuncture combination therapies (n=16), and acupoint injection (n=9). Across the included SRs, 20 reported positive effects, 23 were mixed, and 4 reported no clear evidence of benefit. Only 8 of 47 SRs achieved moderate confidence, and none were rated high, indicating widespread methodological limitations across the evidence base (29 low, 10 critically low).

Conclusion: Acupuncture and related therapies are widely studied as supportive care strategies for breast cancer-related symptoms with promising evidence. However, the majority of SRs are of low methodological quality. High-quality trials and rigorously conducted systematic reviews are needed to strengthen the evidence base, reduce redundancy, and guide integrative oncology practice.

Related

  1. Acupuncture-related therapies as an adjunct to opioid agonist therapy during active dose reduction in adults with opioid use disorder: protocol for a scoping review
    Chen Chen, Xiao-Juan Li, Baochao Fan +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0General medicineCrossref
  2. Acupuncture-related brain network findings across clinical stages of the Alzheimer’s disease continuum: a critical review of functional MRI evidence
    Xue Bai, Yahong Ji, Hengyu Ruan +5
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Assessment of Cancer‐Related Cognitive Impairments Across Anti‐Cancer Therapies in a Predominantly Breast Cancer Cohort
    Qiqi Lei, Martina E. Schmidt, Philipp Zimmer +3
    International Journal of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  4. Current Evidence on the Use of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide-Targeting Therapies in Children and Adolescents.
    Lauren Shin, Ryan Moon, Amy Gelfand
    Current pain and headache reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  5. Depressive and Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Their Associations with Health-Related Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Secondary Analysis.
    Anastasia Karagiannaki, Vasiliki Michou, Evangelia Antoniou +2
    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ang2026acupuncture,
  title = {{Acupuncture and Related Therapies for Breast Cancer-Related Symptoms: An Evidence Map}},
  author = {Lin Ang and Ji Hee Jun and Changsop Yang and Myeong Soo Lee and Tae-Young Choi},
  journal = {Integrative Cancer Therapies},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1177/15347354261490583},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354261490583},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Acupuncture and Related Therapies for Breast Cancer-Related Symptoms: An Evidence Map
AU  - Lin Ang
AU  - Ji Hee Jun
AU  - Changsop Yang
AU  - Myeong Soo Lee
AU  - Tae-Young Choi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Integrative Cancer Therapies
DO  - 10.1177/15347354261490583
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354261490583
AB  - Background: Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy among women worldwide. Despite advances in medical treatment, many survivors experience distressing symptoms and therapy-related side effects that impair quality of life. Acupuncture-related therapies are increasingly employed as supportive care strategies, yet their evidence base remains fragmented.  Objective: To construct an evidence map of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses evaluating acupuncture and related therapies for breast cancer-related symptoms.  Methods: Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Research Information Service System (RISS), Oriental Medicine Advanced Search Integrated System (OASIS), and Korean Studies Information Services System (KISS) from inception to April 24, 2025. Eligible SRs included breast cancer populations, any acupuncture-related intervention, and reported outcomes relevant to symptom management or treatment side effects. Data extraction included bibliographic details, intervention type, outcomes, number of studies, sample size, effect direction, and methodological quality (AMSTAR-2). Evidence was synthesized descriptively and presented using heatmaps.  Results: A total of 47 SRs with meta-analysis were included, covering 11 distinct symptom domains and 6 categories of interventions. The most frequently studied outcomes were hot flashes (n=9), general supportive care during chemotherapy (n=9), lymphedema (n=7), general side effect management (n=6), and aromatase inhibitor-associated arthralgia (n=4). The most common interventions were acupuncture (n=17), acupuncture combination therapies (n=16), and acupoint injection (n=9). Across the included SRs, 20 reported positive effects, 23 were mixed, and 4 reported no clear evidence of benefit. Only 8 of 47 SRs achieved moderate confidence, and none were rated high, indicating widespread methodological limitations across the evidence base (29 low, 10 critically low).  Conclusion: Acupuncture and related therapies are widely studied as supportive care strategies for breast cancer-related symptoms with promising evidence. However, the majority of SRs are of low methodological quality. High-quality trials and rigorously conducted systematic reviews are needed to strengthen the evidence base, reduce redundancy, and guide integrative oncology practice.
SN  - 1534-7354
SN  - 1552-695X
ER  -