Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

From Closed-Set Annotation to In-Context Discovery: Biologically Grounded LLMs for Cellular Profiling

  1. 1InstaDeep

Abstract

Tumour heterogeneity reflects both cellular identity (lineage) and state (active transcriptional programs), yet computational methods generally analyse these axes separately. We introduce CellScribe, a generative framework that conditions a pretrained language model on frozen single cell foundation model embeddings through AdaLN adapters, enabling one shared model to generate an ontology- grounded cell type or a quantified meta-program profile. Supervised multitask fine- tuning produces fine grained typing across hundreds of cell types and outperforms generative and retrieval baselines on meta-program identification under study-holdout evaluation. We further train the model with reinforcement learning, scoring its generations against cell ontology distance and meta-program agreement, so that they align with biological knowledge rather than token agreement. To identify new cell types not present in the supervised training data, we post-train the model to read several labelled example cells in a single context, each conditioning its own text span, and infer the type of a query cell through in-context learning. CellScribe thus unifies cell identity and state in one generative interface, grounds both in biological structure, and identifies cell types outside the supervised vocabulary.

Related

  1. Biologically grounded cell profiling across microscopy modalities
    E. Ye, X. Wu, R. Peng +9
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  2. Biologically grounded locality priors close the data gap for vision transformers in neural prediction
    M. Farina, p. zamberlan, A. Onken +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Reconstruction of Cellular Trajectories with Biologically Interpretable States
    Y. Wang, M. Rattray, D. Barber
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. Integrating multi-omics with machine learning: from genomic variant functional annotation to pharmacogenomics and biomarker discovery
    Jing Lv, Jinjin Guo, Yangyang Wang +3
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. A low-annotation-budget PubMedBERT classifier for chondrogenesis regulator discovery via active learning
    A.-M. Anhel, M. J. Peffers, D. Young +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{gelard2026from,
  title = {{From Closed-Set Annotation to In-Context Discovery: Biologically Grounded LLMs for Cellular Profiling}},
  author = {M. Gelard and H. Benkirane and T. Pierrot and P.-H. Cournede and B. P. de Almeida},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.07.757352},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757352v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - From Closed-Set Annotation to In-Context Discovery: Biologically Grounded LLMs for Cellular Profiling
AU  - M. Gelard
AU  - H. Benkirane
AU  - T. Pierrot
AU  - P.-H. Cournede
AU  - B. P. de Almeida
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.07.757352
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757352v1
AB  - Tumour heterogeneity reflects both cellular identity (lineage) and state (active transcriptional programs), yet computational methods generally analyse these axes separately. We introduce CellScribe, a generative framework that conditions a pretrained language model on frozen single cell foundation model embeddings through AdaLN adapters, enabling one shared model to generate an ontology- grounded cell type or a quantified meta-program profile. Supervised multitask fine- tuning produces fine grained typing across hundreds of cell types and outperforms generative and retrieval baselines on meta-program identification under study-holdout evaluation. We further train the model with reinforcement learning, scoring its generations against cell ontology distance and meta-program agreement, so that they align with biological knowledge rather than token agreement. To identify new cell types not present in the supervised training data, we post-train the model to read several labelled example cells in a single context, each conditioning its own text span, and infer the type of a query cell through in-context learning. CellScribe thus unifies cell identity and state in one generative interface, grounds both in biological structure, and identifies cell types outside the supervised vocabulary.
ER  -