United States Prosperity and the Limits of Inclusive Belonging: A Five Objective Comparison with Europe North America and Asia
Abstract
This paper examines the United States through the Economics of Belonging, assessing five objectives: growth, stability, distribution, human capabilities, and social and institutional belonging. Drawing on an audited 55-country database, it compares the American profile with Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Sweden, Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and China.
The United States combines high income, extensive schooling, and strong perceived neighbor care with substantial inequality, shorter life expectancy than many advanced-economy comparators, comparatively weak perceived governmental care, and high reported discrimination.
A central contribution distinguishes reported discrimination from statistical scores adjusted for relative income and freedom of expression. Across 53 countries with available observations, the American reported value of 50.52% corresponds to a jointly adjusted score of 45.08 at common reference conditions. Substantial differences remain relative to the selected European countries, Canada, Mexico, Japan, and South Korea. The US–China comparison is sensitive to model specification: the gap narrows under the linear adjustment and reverses under a bounded nonlinear alternative.
These adjustments are descriptive diagnostics, not estimates of the true incidence of discrimination or causal effects. The paper develops a comparative research agenda connecting economic resources to effective participation, institutional access, human capabilities, and social recognition while preserving individual initiative and freedom of expression.
The main data used in this study are available in the replication package accompanying The Economics of Belonging: Measuring Economic and Social Achievement across Nations (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23603825). A supplementary archive, United_States_Belonging_Replication.zip (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23674517), provides the analysis files and code needed to reproduce the calculations reported in this article.
Related
- Mexico's Development Paradox: Economic Integration without Inclusive Belonging
- An Objective Assessment for Plank Performance in Active Adults With and Without Low Back Pain: A Reliability and Comparison Study
- Comparison of subjective orofacial esthetic perception and objective malocclusion severity: a cross-sectional study
- Foreboding Amid Prosperity: Phantom Anxiety Theory and Abstract Pessimism
- Head-to-Head Comparison of Flortaucipir and MK6240 tau-PET to Detect Subtle Objective Cognitive Impairment in Clinically Unimpaired Individuals
BibTeX
@misc{diaz2026united,
title = {{United States Prosperity and the Limits of Inclusive Belonging: A Five Objective Comparison with Europe North America and Asia}},
author = {Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23675288},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23675288},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - United States Prosperity and the Limits of Inclusive Belonging: A Five Objective Comparison with Europe North America and Asia
AU - Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23675288
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23675288
AB - This paper examines the United States through the Economics of Belonging, assessing five objectives: growth, stability, distribution, human capabilities, and social and institutional belonging. Drawing on an audited 55-country database, it compares the American profile with Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Sweden, Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and China. The United States combines high income, extensive schooling, and strong perceived neighbor care with substantial inequality, shorter life expectancy than many advanced-economy comparators, comparatively weak perceived governmental care, and high reported discrimination. A central contribution distinguishes reported discrimination from statistical scores adjusted for relative income and freedom of expression. Across 53 countries with available observations, the American reported value of 50.52% corresponds to a jointly adjusted score of 45.08 at common reference conditions. Substantial differences remain relative to the selected European countries, Canada, Mexico, Japan, and South Korea. The US–China comparison is sensitive to model specification: the gap narrows under the linear adjustment and reverses under a bounded nonlinear alternative. These adjustments are descriptive diagnostics, not estimates of the true incidence of discrimination or causal effects. The paper develops a comparative research agenda connecting economic resources to effective participation, institutional access, human capabilities, and social recognition while preserving individual initiative and freedom of expression. The main data used in this study are available in the replication package accompanying The Economics of Belonging: Measuring Economic and Social Achievement across Nations (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23603825). A supplementary archive, United_States_Belonging_Replication.zip (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23674517), provides the analysis files and code needed to reproduce the calculations reported in this article.
ER -