Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Mineralium Deposita

Genetic model for fluorite mineralization at the AGS deposit, St. Lawrence, Newfoundland, Canada: REY patterns, fluid inclusion analysis, Nd-Sm dating, and C, O and S isotopes

  1. 1Geological Survey of Newfoundland and Labrador, 50 Elizabeth Ave., St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 1W4 Canada
  2. 2Harquail School of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6 Canada
  3. 3University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave., Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3 Canada

Abstract

Fluorite mineralization in the AGS deposit occurred in an epithermal setting from fluids exsolved from the associated St. Lawrence Granite and mixed with meteoric water. Veins of the deposit cut Cambrian sedimentary rocks, and sills and a massive variant of the granite. The mineralization is characterized by banded, colloform and breccia textures, and is divided into three stages: Early, Main and Late. The magmatic origin of the fluorite is supported by the Nd-Sm age of ~ 361 Ma, ƐNd values (1.7 to 2.9), strong negative Eu anomalies and REY contents (~ 5 to 1000 times chondrite values) of the fluorite, all comparable to the associated granite. Interaction of a vapour-rich magmatic fluid with oxidized surface-derived fluids formed an acidic fluid that led to greisenization and fracturing of the overlying rocks prior to fluorite precipitation. Fluorite precipitated between ~ 130 and 180 °C from H2O-NaCl-CaCl2±FeCl2±MgCl2 fluids with salinities of 9.7–27.5 eq. wt% NaCl. Carbon isotope data (δ13C between − 6.5 and − 5.6‰) on calcite intergrown with fluorite indicate a magmatic carbon source and δ18O (8.6 to 19.3‰) indicate mixing of magmatic fluids with meteoric water. Main-stage sphalerite returned δ³⁴S values of ~ − 32‰, consistent with biogenic sulfur from the host sedimentary rocks or oxidized magmatic sulfur, whereas Late-stage sphalerite returned δ³⁴S ≈ − 1‰, indicating a dominantly magmatic source. Increasing circulation of fluids in the enveloping sedimentary rocks in the Main and Late stages resulted in smaller negative Eu anomalies in the fluorite, more reducing conditions reflected in the disappearance of hematite and appearance of sulfides, and change in the fluid chemistry (addition of FeCl2 and/or MgCl2).

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-026-01457-0.

Related

  1. Mineral systems, evolutionary patterns, and spatial mineral prospecting methods for rare-metal mineralization
    WANG Rucheng
    Dizhi lixue xuebaoPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeophysics & seismologyDOAJ
  2. Contamination Profile and Health Status of Mya arenaria in the Saguenay–St-Lawrence Marine Park
    Francois Gagne, Chantale André, Samuel Turgeon +1
    Journal of xenobioticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  3. Shipping noise may trigger valve closure responses in exploited scallop beds of the Gulf of St. Lawrence
    Pierre Poitevin, Florian Aulanier, Frédéric Olivier +4
    Marine Pollution BulletinPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionOceanography & cryosphereHAL
  4. Mantle Wedge Metasomatism During Subduction Initiation: Mineral Transformations and Fluid Fluxes (BOIC Ophiolite, Newfoundland)
    Louise Mérit, Philippe Agard, Loïc Labrousse +9
    Geochemistry, Geophysics, GeosystemsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyHAL
  5. Regional fidelity vs dispersal of capelin (Mallotus villosus) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, inferred from otolith chemistry
    Romaric Jac, Elisabeth Van Beveren, Olivier Le Pape +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourEnvironmental science & pollutionPLOSHAL
BibTeX
@article{magyarosi2026genetic,
  title = {{Genetic model for fluorite mineralization at the AGS deposit, St. Lawrence, Newfoundland, Canada: REY patterns, fluid inclusion analysis, Nd-Sm dating, and C, O and S isotopes}},
  author = {Zsuzsanna Magyarosi and James Conliffe and Daniel J. Kontak and Robert Creaser},
  journal = {Mineralium Deposita},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.1007/s00126-026-01457-0},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-026-01457-0},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Genetic model for fluorite mineralization at the AGS deposit, St. Lawrence, Newfoundland, Canada: REY patterns, fluid inclusion analysis, Nd-Sm dating, and C, O and S isotopes
AU  - Zsuzsanna Magyarosi
AU  - James Conliffe
AU  - Daniel J. Kontak
AU  - Robert Creaser
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/29
JO  - Mineralium Deposita
DO  - 10.1007/s00126-026-01457-0
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-026-01457-0
AB  - Fluorite mineralization in the AGS deposit occurred in an epithermal setting from fluids exsolved from the associated St. Lawrence Granite and mixed with meteoric water. Veins of the deposit cut Cambrian sedimentary rocks, and sills and a massive variant of the granite. The mineralization is characterized by banded, colloform and breccia textures, and is divided into three stages: Early, Main and Late. The magmatic origin of the fluorite is supported by the Nd-Sm age of ~ 361 Ma, ƐNd values (1.7 to 2.9), strong negative Eu anomalies and REY contents (~ 5 to 1000 times chondrite values) of the fluorite, all comparable to the associated granite. Interaction of a vapour-rich magmatic fluid with oxidized surface-derived fluids formed an acidic fluid that led to greisenization and fracturing of the overlying rocks prior to fluorite precipitation. Fluorite precipitated between ~ 130 and 180 °C from H2O-NaCl-CaCl2±FeCl2±MgCl2 fluids with salinities of 9.7–27.5 eq. wt% NaCl. Carbon isotope data (δ13C between − 6.5 and − 5.6‰) on calcite intergrown with fluorite indicate a magmatic carbon source and δ18O (8.6 to 19.3‰) indicate mixing of magmatic fluids with meteoric water. Main-stage sphalerite returned δ³⁴S values of ~ − 32‰, consistent with biogenic sulfur from the host sedimentary rocks or oxidized magmatic sulfur, whereas Late-stage sphalerite returned δ³⁴S ≈ − 1‰, indicating a dominantly magmatic source. Increasing circulation of fluids in the enveloping sedimentary rocks in the Main and Late stages resulted in smaller negative Eu anomalies in the fluorite, more reducing conditions reflected in the disappearance of hematite and appearance of sulfides, and change in the fluid chemistry (addition of FeCl2 and/or MgCl2).  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-026-01457-0.
SN  - 0026-4598
SN  - 1432-1866
ER  -